Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: metro railways construction of works act 1978 chapter iii acquisition Sorted by: old Court: kerala Page 5 of about 54 results (0.069 seconds)

Jul 15 2009 (HC)

Regional Director, Esi Corporation Vs. G. Sivaprasad, Proprietor, M.S. ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (2010)ILLJ279Ker

..... or(iii) generating, transforming or transmitting power; or(iv) composing types for printing, printing by letterpress, lithography, photogravure or other similar process or book binding or(v) constructing, reconstructing, repairing, refitting, finishing or breaking up ships or vessels or(vi) preserving or storing any article in cold storage.as for establishments other than factories as contemplated ..... of march 29,operation of the mines act, 1952 1975 vide notification no.(central act 35 of 1952), or a 2287/e2/73/lbr dated march 22,railway running shed or an 1975 published in the keralaestablishment which is exclusively gazette dated march 25, 1975 asengaged in any of the sro. no. 288/75.manufacturing ..... power or is ordinarily so carried on,but does not include a mine subject to the operation of the mines act, 1952 (35 of 1952) or a railway running shed;the above definition shows that in the case of a premises where manufacturing process is carried on with the aid of power, the minimum number .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 06 2010 (HC)

The Executive Engineer Vs. the General Secretary and the Industrial Tr ...

Court : Kerala

..... of the industrial tribunal to adjudicate on the dispute. the relevant averment therein reads as follows:the english translation thereof is given below:investigation and construction of the neendakara fishing harbour is done by the harbour engineering department of the government of kerala. it is a service department of the government ..... in the project does not fall within the jurisdiction of the industrial tribunal. it was stated that local people were engaged on daily wages for the construction and other related works directly by the port engineering department, that local people were thus engaged following the rules governing engagement of daily rated workers, ..... were represented by the first respondent union.3. the appellant opposed the claim of the workers. it was contended that the investigation and the subsequent construction work of the neendakara fishing harbour was done by the port engineering department of the kerala government which is a department of the government and not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 12 2012 (HC)

Union of India Rep. by Chief Engineer, Naval Works, Kochi Vs. M/S. Bha ...

Court : Kerala

..... work are allowed without adequate safeguards, and, further challenges to the award permitted without reasonable restriction imposed. even in respect of an mes contract where the construction was within a naval base is not the applicability of the regulation of 569(k) desirable and more so necessary, is a matter that requires serious ..... to the award is circumscribed by the defence services regulations since the disputes covered by the arbitration proceedings pertained to the execution of a contract over the construction of a hangar in the naval base. we have taken note that in the defence services regulations, certain procedures are laid down for arbitration in ..... contractor to execute the work, even after its execution. while the contract work was in progress with nearly 86% of such work completed, the aed hangar constructed collapsed down on 27-03-1992. rehabilitation work was carried out by the same contractor/ respondent without entering into any fresh contract, and, later, the work .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 2012 (HC)

State of Kerala, Represented by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of K ...

Court : Kerala

..... "nonetheless, it cannot be over-emphasised that the scope and concept of mitigating factors in the area of death penalty must receive a liberal and expansive construction by the courts in accord with the sentencing policy writ large in section 354(3). judges should never be bloodthirsty. hanging of murderers has never been too ..... were to legitimately fall within that band of cases where a death sentence can be avoided by invocation of the option available under swami sradhanandha, the construction canvassed by the additional director general of prosecution and some others would lead to the perverse situation that the sessions courts without considering that question at all ..... cases in which the harshest sentence of death can be avoided by invoking the powers to impose a harsher sentence of imprisonment for life. if the construction canvassed by the additional director general of prosecution and some counsel were accepted and it were to be held that only the confirming court (the high court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 2013 (HC)

Majeed P.V Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Court : Kerala

..... can definitely throw light in this regard. the main issue considered there was, whether 'ordinary earth' used for filling or levelling purpose in the construction of embankments, roads, railways and buildings has validly been declared as "minor mineral" by the central government vide notification dated 3.2.2000 issued under section 3(e) of ..... 1957 (67 of 1957), the central government hereby declares the 'ordinary earth' used for filling or leveling purpose in construction of w.p.c. no.4415/13 & conn. cases -10- embankments, roads, railways, buildings to be a minor mineral in addition to the minerals already declared as minor minerals hereinbefore under the said clause." ..... is obstructed and hence the process of 'weathering' may continue even after using the same for building purpose and hence it is not suitable for construction activities. since river sand is produced by the natural process of erosion and sedimentation which starts from the source/rock and passes through streams and river .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 2014 (HC)

M/S. Green Track Engineers and Construction Vs. the Kerala Minerals an ...

Court : Kerala

..... authority acting reasonably and in accordance with relevant law could have reached'; (iii) whether public interest is affected. these principles were followed in tejas constructions and infrastructure private limited v. municipal council, sendhwa and another: (2012) 6 scc464and michigan rubber (india) limited v. state of karnataka and others ..... metals ltd. ( a government of kerala undertaking) mineral separation unit kovilthottam, chavara, kollam-691 583 represented by its managing director.2. tvk construction araamam, padanayarkulangara north, karunagappally, kollam district.3. deepthi transport service vadakkidam building, karithura, chavara kollam. r3 is deleted from party arrayas per the ..... against the judgment in wp(c) no.9984/2013 of high court of kerala dated0508-2013 appellant/petitioner: m/s. green track engineers and construction vii/143 a, panmana, karunagappally kollam district represented by its operation manager, pradeep.r. s/o.radhakrishnan. by advs.sri.grashious kuriakose (sr .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2014 (HC)

Planters Forum Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... study in the matter of the proposed establishment of the indian institute of space, science and technology and the land to be not used for any constructional activities. petitioners supports the notifications issued declaring different land as ecologically fragile under the ordinances and the 2003 act.34. shri k.v. viswanathan, senior ..... thus: "resources included products of farm, forest, manufacture, art, education, etc. . . . the `resources' of a country include its land, timber, coal, crops, improvements, railways, factories and everything that goes to make up its wealth or to render it desirable." 68. explaining the concept of distribution under article 39(b) the following was laid down ..... and timber from any of the seven north- eastern states to any other state of the country either by rail, road or waterways. the indian railways and the state governments are directed to take all measures necessary to ensure strict compliance of this direction. this ban will not apply to the movement .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 2014 (HC)

Jose Jacob Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... exemplify, we can refer to exhibit p11b in w.p.(c)no.3893/2014. i have already adverted to the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners that ktdfc constructed shopping complexes on the properties of the corporation on the basis of built-operate-transfer (bot). in this regard, it is worthwhile to observe the answers of the corporation to ..... the queries under right to information act from some of its former employees:1. in which places owned by ksrtc agreement was signed with ktdfc for construction of shopping complexes on bot basis? furnish the area of each plan. ans: ksrtc has not signed any agreement with ktdfc for ..... construction of shopping compled on bot basis. only the government order is available.2. whether board of directors of the corporation had accorded sanction for the above matters and if so .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 20 2015 (HC)

C.K.Joseph Vs. Kerala State Electricity Board

Court : Kerala

..... connection of cons. no. kumbalangy centre on 29.08.1998 on the ground that the service line drawn to the consumer has no clearance to a new adjacent building under construction. but the consumer was not served with a notice before disconnection. (2) there is another service connection ie. cons. no. 10632 in the same service line having the same problem ..... taking action against cons. no.3435. (3) a notice under section 79, 140a of indian electricity rule 1956 could have been served on the owner of the building under construction (sri. p.j.sunny) and he should have been asked to stop the construction until sufficient clearance is provided. but no such notice was issued to the owner of the building under ..... construction. instead actions taken against cons. no. 3435 who was not guilty in this matter. (4) sri. c.k. joseph, neither reported the matter to the superior officers nor he obtained .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 2015 (HC)

Dr.Sindhu S Vs. The Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies

Court : Kerala

..... rule of interpretation to seek the meaning of words used in an act in the definition clauses of other statutes and that it would be a new tenor in the construction of statutes if it required to limit a word to an unnatural sense because in some act which is not incorporated or referred to, such an interpretation is given to .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //