Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: metro railways construction of works act 1978 chapter iii acquisition Sorted by: old Court: delhi Page 18 of about 218 results (0.164 seconds)

Oct 17 2016 (HC)

Symantec Software Solutions Pvt Ltd & Ors vs.ms. R. Modi & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... 26 solutions inc. and claimed to provide services in the field of 2d / 3d animation and computer aided designs in addition to drafting solutions to the global architecture, engineering and construction industry; (d) that in july, 2008, the plaintiffs received information through bsa of usage of huge unlicensed / pirated software programs of the plaintiffs by the defendants on their computer systems ..... , the investigator called his alleged, and fabricated, client to be exact replica of fluor daniel it is paramount to mention that the said fluor daniel company is an engineering and construction corporation. by falsely terming his company to be a replica of fluor and repeatedly using other means to entrap the defendants, the plaintiffs are trying to make out a case .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 27 2016 (HC)

The Indian Hotels Company Ltd. Vs.new Delhi Municipal Council

Court : Delhi

..... reflects that the hotel is the result of the joint venture between the parties, wherein the ndmc contributed the hotel building while ihcl contributed planning, designing, construction, equipment, commissioning and operation of the hotel . to take its case forward ihcl pleads that the collaboration agreement dated december 18, 1976 was still subsisting rfa ..... of income tax, (2006) 13 scc481shreedhar govind kamekar v. yesahwant govind kamerkar & anr., the judgment of this court reported as (2001) 91 dlt730(db) vidhi constructions pvt. ltd. vs.baljit kaur, and the judgment of house of lords reported as (1873) xx lr25(hl) robinson vs. ashton as per ihcl when any party ..... advanced by sh.harish n.salve, learned senior counsel concerning the interpretation of the clause. notwithstanding land made available by ndmc and entire money to construct the hotel building being made available by ndmc, ihcl contributed to the hotel building being rendered fit for use as a five star hotel by providing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 04 2016 (HC)

Mahender Yadav vs.central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... gravely erred in this regard. (emphasis supplied) 33. the applicants have also placed reliance on the pronouncement of the supreme court reported at (1998) 4 scc577 chetak construction ltd. v. om prakash & ors. rendered in exercise of contempt of court jurisdiction. in this case, while recusing from hearing the matter, the learned judge made ..... dinakaran v. judges inquiry committee; (2011) 14 scc770 state of punjab v. davinder pal singh bhullar; (1877) 2 qbb558(562), serjeant & ors. v. dale; (1998) 4 scc577 chetak construction ltd. v. om prakash & ors.; (1987) 4 scc611 ranjit thakur v. uoi; (2001) 2 scc330 state of punjab v. v.k. khanna & ors. and (2010) 15 ..... a disqualified adjudicator may be waived, and this may be so even where the disqualification is statutory. [wakefield local board of health v. west riding and grimsby railway co., (1865) lr1qb84 the court normally insists that the objection shall be taken as soon as the party prejudiced knows the facts which entitle him to object. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 2017 (HC)

Sushil Arora vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... circumstances mentioned above, it is presumed that ram singh was also present there. therefore, the case of ram singh can be distinguished. his mere presence cannot constructively make him liable and both the courts below have simply applied section 34 without taking into consideration whether any specific overt act is proved against the appellant ram ..... described, for convenience variously by name or as accused / appellant no.5 (a-5) was statedly arrested on basis of secret information, from outside new delhi railway station and after further investigation, another supplementary report under section 173 cr. pc (second supplementary charge-sheet) was submitted on 02.01.2010 in the court of ..... to be identical. a report in this regard was obtained from the concerned branch manager. on 09/04/09, indica car no.dl3 ax2192was found abandoned near metro station ag-1, vikas puri, delhi, which was brought at police station. it was got inspected by crime team. thereafter the said car was seized and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2017 (HC)

Virbhadra Singh & Anr. Vs.central Bureau of Investigation & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... by him to purchase lic policies in the names of shri virbhadra singh, his wife and son, in 2011-12, however, the sale proceeds were used for construction of house of shri vir bhadra singh at rampur. no documentary evidence in support of the sale proceeds of the year 2011-12 could be made available by ..... offences which are the delhi special police establishment. investigated by to be section 5. (1) the central government may by order extend to any area (including railway areas), the powers and jurisdiction of members of delhi special police establishment for the investigation of any offences or classes of offences specified in a notification under section ..... the government of the state in which such area is situated; extension of the powers and jurisdiction of members of a police force belonging to any state to railway areas outside that state. [ emphasis supplied ].157. the petition of the appellant was dismissed by this court. consequently, the appellant approached the supreme court upon .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 21 2017 (HC)

Shri Parmod Kumar Gupta & Others vs.smt Vidya Devi & Others

Court : Delhi

..... deed dated 12.10.1998 executed by cs(os) no.131/2017 page 10 defendant no.2 in favour of defendant no.1. therefore, the findings in m/s consolidated construction consortium ltd. (supra) are not applicable on the facts of this case.14. in the case gurdeep singh (supra), the petitioner had invoked the writ jurisdiction of the court ..... father which was leased out to him by dda. the findings in these cases, therefore, are of no help to the plaintiffs.13. in the case of m/s consolidated construction consortium ltd. (supra), the issue before the civil court was whether the bank, i.e., the secured creditor had committed a fraud and the proceedings were challenged on the ..... and thereafter the cs(os) no.131/2017 page 2 plaintiffs have become the owner of 50% undivided share of that plot. during the lifetime of their father, the constructions were raised on the said plot. the defendant no.2 vide a registered release deed registered as document no.65111 in additional book no.1, volume no.9108 on pages .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 03 2017 (HC)

Virbhadra Singh & Anr vs.enforcement Directorate & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... kesavananda bharati vs. state of kerala, (1973) 4 scc225 it was concluded that: 2140. it is hazardous to rely upon parliamentary debates as aids to statutory construction. different speakers have different motives and the system of party whip leaves no warrant for assuming that those who voted but did not speak were of identical persuasion. ..... . that this form of extrinsic aid to the interpretation of statutes is not admissible has been generally accepted in england, and the same rule has been observed in the construction of indian statutes" (emphasis supplied) 104. in state of mysore vs. r.v. bidap, (1974) 3 scc337 it was observed: 5. anglo-american systems, ..... a section, however, being "very broad and general indicators of the nature of the subject matter dealt with thereunder" and consequently having "a limited role to play in the construction of statutes", as held by a bench of three hon'ble judges in forage & co. (of ushala) vs. municipal corporation of greater bombay & ors., (1999) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 22 2017 (HC)

Court on Its Own Motion vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... res integra that all provisions of an enactment have to be read together to give effect to each of the provisions. it is a rule of construction that each provision has to be so read, that life can be infused in another provision of the same enactment and the other is not rendered otiose ..... entitlement of persons with disability to equal opportunity to personal mobility and casts an obligation upon the state to provide such facilities for persons with disabilities at railway stations to ensure such accessibility standards to all modes of transport as would provide a level playing field to the disabled so far as transport is ..... public in urban and rural areas.41. (1) the appropriate government shall take suitable measures to provide, (a) facilities for persons with disabilities at bus stops, railway stations and airports conforming to the accessibility standards relating to parking spaces, toilets, ticketing counters and ticketing machines; (b) access to all modes of transport that conform .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 07 2017 (HC)

Vikram Bakshi vs.state & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... in kuppuswami case, but, yet it may not be an interlocutory order pure or simple. some kinds of order may fall in between the two. by a rule of harmonious construction, we think that the bar in sub-section (2) of section 397 is not meant to be attracted to such kinds of intermediate orders. they may not be final orders ..... section 15-a of the act on the date be deemed to become tenant but it does not detract from the power of the tenant not to create licence. the construction placed by the full bench, in our opinion, would curtail the language of the section and on the basis of the high court's judgment, the amendment ceases to be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 2017 (HC)

Dtc vs.saroop Singh(through Legal Heir Ajay)

Court : Delhi

..... decisions w.p.(c) no.6322/2004 and 6687/2004 page 27 of 41 such as p.g.i. of medical education & research, chandigarh (supra), m.p. state electricity, indian railways construction co. ltd. v. ajay kumar, (2003) 4 scc579and hindustan motors limited v. tapan kumar bhattacharya, (2002) 6 scc41 m/s. hindustan tin works (supra), reinstatement with back wages, had been ..... is well settled that in construing the provisions of a welfare legislation, courts should adopt, what is described as a beneficent rule of construction. if two constructions are reasonably possible to be placed on the section, it follows that the construction which furthers the policy and object of the act and is more beneficial to the employees, has to be preferred. another principle .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //