Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: metro railways amendment act 2009 section 12 amendment of section 23 Court: jharkhand Page 10 of about 642 results (2.569 seconds)

Jan 09 2017 (HC)

Naresh Baskey Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... found case under section 3 (x)(xiv) of the scheduled caste and scheduled tribe (prevention of atrocities) act, so he has not preferred an appeal under section 14-a of the scheduled caste and scheduled tribe (prevention of atrocities) amendment act, rather he has preferred anticipatory bail application. so, the defect as pointed out by the office is ..... passed interim order in favour of the petitioner. let this case go out of my list to be placed before another bench after taking necessary permission from hon'ble the acting chief justice. till then, interim order granted earlier shall continue. (anant bijay singh, j.) sunil/ in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a.b.a. ..... passed interim order in favour of the petitioner. let this case go out of my list to be placed before another bench after taking necessary permission from hon'ble the acting chief justice. till then, interim order granted earlier shall continue. (anant bijay singh, j.) sunil/ in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a.b.a. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 2005 (HC)

Fatik Chandra Dutta Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2005(1)BLJR298; [2005(105)FLR200]; [2005(1)JCR411(Jhr)]

..... a) he has completed his sixteenth year;'for proper appreciation, it is also relevant to quote the post- amended, section 40 of the mines act, 1952 :'40. employment of persons below eighteen years of age.-(1) after the commencement of the mines (amendment) act, 1983, no person below eighteen years of age shall be allowed to work in any mine or par ..... thereof.'13. the petitioner was appointed on 20th, october, 1962 i.e. 22 years prior to amendment of section 40 of the mines act. therefore, the respondents can not presume that he was appointed at the age of 18 years and thereby they can not push back his date of ..... the petitioners of those cases were appointed below the age of 18 years, which was alleged to be not permissible according to the mines act, 1952. having noticed that the amendment of section 40 of the mines act, came into force much later and that the petitioner were appointed prior to the same, division bench held that after lapse of a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 18 2003 (HC)

Cambridge Trust of India Vs. Ranchi University and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2003(3)JCR203(Jhr)]

..... state.11. in this respect, one may notice the rule framed under section 16 of the 'bihar state engineering & pharmacy educational institution (regulation and control) act, 1982' as amended by resolution dated 24th november, 1990. in proforma i, the 'the department of science and technology' has been mentioned who is to call for applications ..... was framed by the governor of bihar, under clause (3) of article 166 of the constitution of india, now adopted by the government of jharkhand with amendment, the power to deal with matters of technical education college, including technical, vocational education and training, has been delegated with the department of science and technology. ..... and technology of the state is the competent department to determine the question of approval of affiliation of an engineering college under section 21 of the universities act, 1976 and the department of human resources of the state has no roll to play.12. the approval of affiliation of the institute, in question, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 17 2004 (HC)

Chittaranjan Sahay and ors. Vs. Ashutosh and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2004(4)JCR313(Jhr)]

..... to sc/st category of direct recruit outsiders , to rectify the aforesaid anomaly the roster of direct recruit 'outsider general' as well as 'outsider sc/st' were amended by the. govt. of india by excluding the name of shri s.b. gayakwad from the roster of 'outsider general' and including it in the 'outsider sc/ ..... (contesting respondents), on the other hand. submitted that this court in its jurisdiction vested under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india has to act in furtherance of interest of justice and not in order to thwart it. learned counsel submitted that the review application was not based on any new cause ..... which they competed in the examinations for selection to the indian forest service conducted by the union public service commission. after coming into force of bihar reorganisation act 2000. and the resultant bifurcation of the cadre of the indian forest service of the erstwhile bihar between the two successor states, these petitioners were allocated jharkhand .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 03 2008 (HC)

Randhir Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2008(3)JCR636(Jhr)]

..... of the association in the same name and style is violative of section 12(a), 12(b) of the bihar amendment in societies registration act, as also sections 21 and 23 of the bihar amendment societies registration act. the petitioner protested against such illegal registration of the respondent but till date no order has been passed by the ..... jharkhand state cricket association. the application was accepted on 23.3.2005. it has been further stated that all the relevant provisions of the society registration act and rules have been properly followed and there is no infirmity and illegality in registration of the society. the registration has been done in the light of ..... society was already registered. the subsequent registration in the same name and style is contrary to the provisions of section 12(b) of the societies registration act. it has been stated that objection to the registration also has not been entertained and the order has been arbitrarily passed ignoring the said legal provisions.5 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 10 2015 (HC)

Ajay Rastogi Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Secretary Department of Mi ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... a legislative function and such legislative function cannot be delegated. it is further submitted that, neither the jharkhand minor mineral 5 concession rules, 2014 (as amended upto 2014) nor any other law, creates a disqualification to an intending tenderer who fails to submit no objection certificate and thus, clause 16 of ..... learned counsel referred to section 4 of the panchayat (extension of schedule area) act, 1996 to submit that, it is an enabling provision, in terms thereof rule 11 of the jharkhand minor mineral concession rules, 2004 has been amended however, the said provision also does not prescribe production of no objection certificate as ..... a condition precedent for participating in the auction.7. there is no dispute that panchayat (extension to schedule area) act, 1996 is a central legislation and jharkhand minor mineral .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 10 2015 (HC)

Dev Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Secretary Department of Mines ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... a legislative function and such legislative function cannot be delegated. it is further submitted that, neither the jharkhand minor mineral 5 concession rules, 2014 (as amended upto 2014) nor any other law, creates a disqualification to an intending tenderer who fails to submit no objection certificate and thus, clause 16 of ..... learned counsel referred to section 4 of the panchayat (extension of schedule area) act, 1996 to submit that, it is an enabling provision, in terms thereof rule 11 of the jharkhand minor mineral concession rules, 2004 has been amended however, the said provision also does not prescribe production of no objection certificate as ..... a condition precedent for participating in the auction.7. there is no dispute that panchayat (extension to schedule area) act, 1996 is a central legislation and jharkhand minor mineral .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 2016 (HC)

Jago Foundation Through Its Secretary Baidyanath Mahto Vs. Union of In ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... and after consulting the state governments and the union territories administrations, the central government repealed the 1929 act and enacted the prohibition of child marriage act, 2006.4. rule 4 of the jharkhand child marriage prohibition rules ..... recommended that, (i) the punishment provided under the act should be more stringent; (ii) marriages performed in contravention of the act should be made void; and (iii) the offences under the act should be made cognizable. the national human rights commission also undertook a comprehensive review of the existing act and made recommendations for comprehensive amendment in its annual report 2001-02. accepting the recommendations .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2017 (HC)

K K Trading Company Through One of Its Partners Namely Narendra Kumar ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... of environment, forest and climate change, a notification dated 04.01.2017 has been issued by the ministry of mines under section 24(1) of mmdr amendment act, 2015 wherein the state governments have been enabled to grant the lease without necessitating environmental clearance at this stage, provided that environmental clearance is obtained prior ..... for grant of lease of minerals covered under part-c of schedule-i in respect of which approval in terms of section 5(1) of the unamended act of mmdr act, 1957 have been granted by the central government earlier. the individual petitioners, however, relate to different minerals under part-c of schedule-i. petitioner ..... in consultation with the departments/organizations in respect of cases, which are pending for grant of mining lease under section 10(a)(2)(c) of the mmdr act, 2015. counsel for the petitioner submits that the competent authority under the respondent-state may, therefore, consider the application of the petitioners in accordance with .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2017 (HC)

Omiyo Ranjan Jaiswal Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Its Principal ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... of environment, forest and climate change, a notification dated 04.01.2017 has been issued by the ministry of mines under section 24(1) of mmdr amendment act, 2015 wherein the state governments have been enabled to grant the lease without necessitating environmental clearance at this stage, provided that environmental clearance is obtained prior ..... for grant of lease of minerals covered under part-c of schedule-i in respect of which approval in terms of section 5(1) of the unamended act of mmdr act, 1957 have been granted by the central government earlier. the individual petitioners, however, relate to different minerals under part-c of schedule-i. petitioner ..... in consultation with the departments/organizations in respect of cases, which are pending for grant of mining lease under section 10(a)(2)(c) of the mmdr act, 2015. counsel for the petitioner submits that the competent authority under the respondent-state may, therefore, consider the application of the petitioners in accordance with .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //