Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: merchant shipping amendment act 2007 section 4 amendment of section 31 Sorted by: recent Court: rajasthan jodhpur Page 1 of about 53 results (0.168 seconds)

Nov 17 2015 (HC)

M/S Perfect Thread Mills Ltd Vs. Competent Authority Cum Sdo Girwa an ...

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... concurrent list, of the viith schedule read with article 254 of the constitution empowers the state legislature to amend the indian stamp act, 1899. in exercise thereof all the state legislatures including the legislature of a.p. amended the act and enacted section 47-a empowering the registering officer to levy stamp duty on instruments of conveyance, etc., ..... the high court, it is not correct law. as we have already noted, section 47-a being local amendment, made by each state legislature did not find any such statutory basis. like a.p. act,tamil nadu act is also referable to transactions intra vivos and not as general guidelines. if they are based on evidence ..... rise to injustice and thus leading to interference by the higher authorities under the land acquisition act was gone into. that case turned on the provisions of section 23 of the land acquisition act as amended by the united provinces town improvement act, 1919. in that case lord macmillan, lord wright, lord du 44 parcq, martin l .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 2015 (HC)

Raja Ram and Ors Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... special officer, water resources and chief engineer, water resources (north).hanumangarh and further a prayer has been made that the respondents be restrained from altering and amending the outlets of chak 1md to 6md.tehsil anoopgarh, district sriganganagar. the petitioners in the present writ petitions are agriculturists, most of them allottees of agriculture land ..... position regarding the right of the agriculturists to receive water, only in accordance with what has been sanctioned to them and as the provisions of the act and the rules does not arm the petitioners to determine as to how the supply of water should be regulated by the respondents despite admittedly petitioners drawing ..... this, in this respect, shall lie against the government, and that persons violating this rule shall be liable to punishment under section 55(9) of the act. it is in this sequence, that sub-rule (2) contemplates that no material change shall be made in an established system of canal distribution except under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 2015 (HC)

Sukhmandar Singh Vs. State of Raj. and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... special officer, water resources and chief engineer, water resources (north).hanumangarh and further a prayer has been made that the respondents be restrained from altering and amending the outlets of chak 1md to 6md.tehsil anoopgarh, district sriganganagar. the petitioners in the present writ petitions are agriculturists, most of them allottees of agriculture land ..... position regarding the right of the agriculturists to receive water, only in accordance with what has been sanctioned to them and as the provisions of the act and the rules does not arm the petitioners to determine as to how the supply of water should be regulated by the respondents despite admittedly petitioners drawing ..... this, in this respect, shall lie against the government, and that persons violating this rule shall be liable to punishment under section 55(9) of the act. it is in this sequence, that sub-rule (2) contemplates that no material change shall be made in an established system of canal distribution except under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 2015 (HC)

Nikhil Soni Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... in state of gujarat v/s mirzapur moti kureshi kassab jamat and ors. ((2005) 8 scc 534), a constitution bench considering the bombay animal preservation (gujarat amendment) act, 1994 restricting the bulls and bullocks below the age of 16 years could not be slaughtered, repelled the challenge on the ground that slaughtering of cows on bakri ..... , approval must be sought from the high court by filing a petition under article 226 of the constitution of india. the high court in such case acts as parens patriae. the matter should be decided by atleast two judges. the bench will constitute a committee of three reputed doctors after consulting such medical authorities ..... body). it leads to the inward path of nirvriti from pravriti by complete detachment form the sensory system. santhara is an exercise for self-purification. this religious act known as sallekhna-santhara has remained very popular through out the history of jainism. it is mostly known for a voluntary vow meditation till the person lives: .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 2015 (HC)

Dinesh Bothra Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... competent authority., that in compliance of the order dated 27.02.2012 the state government under section 15 of the mmdr act issued notification dated 19.06.2012 and made necessary amendment in the rules of 1986 while incorporating all the recommendations of the moef of march 2010 and also model guidelines of ..... enforced inter-alia, under the provisions of the water (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1974, the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981, the environment (protection) act, 1986 and the public liability insurance act, 1991 along with their amendments and rules made there under and also any other orders passed by the hon'ble ..... and ultra vires the notification issued by the central government under the environment (protection) act, 1986, and the environment (protection) rules, 1986. 2 the petitioner has also prayed for declaring all the actions taken in pursuance to the amended rules vide notification dated 19.6.2012 as well as advertisements dated 26.10.2012 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2015 (HC)

Rockwood Hotels and Resorts Ltd Vs. State of Raj. and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... of the land as it was recorded in its name in the record of rights. the report also pointed out that so far as araji no.10 is concerned, the amendment was erroneously made, and it should have been made in arazi nos.9 & 10, jointly, and not in arazi no.10 alone. learned single judge was carried away ..... of law.24. we do not find any lack of authority nor any prohibition in {17} dbsaw nos.715/2013, 714/2013 & 739/2013 the land revenue act or uit act which may prohibit or any statutory provision which may have restrained the state government to constitute a committee of senior officers, who had already submitted its report, confirming the ..... be passed by the authority concerned, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, in conformity with the provisions of section 91-a and 92-b of the act of 1959. he further held that the court cannot sit in appeal over the administrative decisions taken by the competent authorities for removing encroachments upon the government land and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2015 (HC)

Hilton Granite Ltd Vs. State of Raj. and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... of the land as it was recorded in its name in the record of rights. the report also pointed out that so far as araji no.10 is concerned, the amendment was erroneously made, and it should have been made in arazi nos.9 & 10, jointly, and not in arazi no.10 alone. learned single judge was carried away ..... of law.24. we do not find any lack of authority nor any prohibition in {17} dbsaw nos.715/2013, 714/2013 & 739/2013 the land revenue act or uit act which may prohibit or any statutory provision which may have restrained the state government to constitute a committee of senior officers, who had already submitted its report, confirming the ..... be passed by the authority concerned, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, in conformity with the provisions of section 91-a and 92-b of the act of 1959. he further held that the court cannot sit in appeal over the administrative decisions taken by the competent authorities for removing encroachments upon the government land and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2015 (HC)

Rockwood Hotels and Resorts Ltd Vs. State and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... of the land as it was recorded in its name in the record of rights. the report also pointed out that so far as araji no.10 is concerned, the amendment was erroneously made, and it should have been made in arazi nos.9 & 10, jointly, and not in arazi no.10 alone. learned single judge was carried away ..... of law.24. we do not find any lack of authority nor any prohibition in {17} dbsaw nos.715/2013, 714/2013 & 739/2013 the land revenue act or uit act which may prohibit or any statutory provision which may have restrained the state government to constitute a committee of senior officers, who had already submitted its report, confirming the ..... be passed by the authority concerned, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, in conformity with the provisions of section 91-a and 92-b of the act of 1959. he further held that the court cannot sit in appeal over the administrative decisions taken by the competent authorities for removing encroachments upon the government land and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 2015 (HC)

Vikas Verma @ Vicky and Ors Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... the crime. . we fully endorse the above view once again.34. it is relevant to point out that section 364-a had been introduced in the ipc by virtue of amendment act 42 of 1993. the statement of objects and reasons is as follows:- 1. kidnappings by terrorists for ransom, for creating panic amongst the people and for securing release of ..... of the captured ship. . 19.therefore, ransom is money or any consideration which is demanded or paid for the release of a captive, prisoner or a detenue. even if an individual is kidnapped ..... ransom . as under: 1341. nature of the contract of ransom. - ransom is a contract entered into between the captors and the commander of a captured ship, by which the captors permit the captured ship to proceed under safe conduct in consideration of a sum of money paid or promised by the commander in his own name and that of the owners .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 2015 (HC)

Mahendra Singh @ Happy Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... the crime. . we fully endorse the above view once again.34. it is relevant to point out that section 364-a had been introduced in the ipc by virtue of amendment act 42 of 1993. the statement of objects and reasons is as follows:- 1. kidnappings by terrorists for ransom, for creating panic amongst the people and for securing release of ..... of the captured ship. . 19.therefore, ransom is money or any consideration which is demanded or paid for the release of a captive, prisoner or a detenue. even if an individual is kidnapped ..... ransom . as under: 1341. nature of the contract of ransom. - ransom is a contract entered into between the captors and the commander of a captured ship, by which the captors permit the captured ship to proceed under safe conduct in consideration of a sum of money paid or promised by the commander in his own name and that of the owners .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //