Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: merchant shipping amendment act 2007 section 4 amendment of section 31 Court: kolkata Page 10 of about 690 results (0.148 seconds)

Feb 06 2009 (HC)

Secretary, Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India Vs. the Co ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : LC2009(2)323

..... the underlying object of amendment was expressed in the following words: 'under the existing article 226 of the ..... 16. after noticing the two principal cases that led to the amendment of article 226 - judgments that the fifth respondent has cited here - the supreme court quoted the object of the amendment at paragraph 16 of the report:16. it may be stated that by the constitution (forty-second amendment) act, 1976, clause (1-a) was renumbered as clause (2). ..... patentee on 20.11.2006 and the annexure submitted on 11.06.2007, it is not clear what is the purpose of filing those amendments as stipulated in section 57(2) of patents act. equity demands that the annexure filed on 11.06.2007 should have been endorsed to the opponents by the patentee. it is not a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 1899 (PC)

In Re: the Matter of Purna Chunder Pal Mukhtar

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1900)ILR27Cal1023

..... which may extend to six months or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees or with both.'6. in 1896, the legislature thought it proper to amend the act. by act xi of that year, they, among some other matters, rescinded section 36 and incorporated in section 13 the several cases of misconduct in a pleader or mukhtar, ..... 13(2) whether in the circumstances of the case, purna chunder pal should either he dismissed or suspended.3. section 13 of the legal practitioners' act, as it originally stood before certain amendments were made in 1896 which i shall presently notice was as follows (omitting the last portion which is not material in the present case): 'the ..... position to contradict the facts upon which the order of the magistrate was based.16. we have, on the other hand, the fact that since his passing the mukhtar-ship examination, purna chunder pal has been practising for about six years as a mukhtar, apparently without any fault; and the learned vakil who appeared before us, read to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 13 1883 (PC)

Moothora Kant Shaw and ors. Vs. the India General Steam Navigation Co.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1884)ILR10Cal166

..... also have their costs of this reference.mitter, j.33. this was a suit for the recovery of rs. 296, being the value of 72 drums of jute shipped by the plaintiffs on board the defendants' flat delta at kaligunge for being carried to calcutta. there is no question that the defendants are common carriers under the indian ..... to deal with all or any of the subjects above referred to, and to add them as a new chapter to the act. with this view, leave has already been asked to introduce a bill to amend and consolidate the law relating to carriers, and it would no doubt be desirable that the law of master and servant should at ..... . in introducing the bill which subsequently became the indian contract act, 1872, mr. fitzjames stephen said: 'we have omitted all reference to special branches of the law of contract which at present are regulated either by express legislation or recognised custom, e.g., the law of shipping, of bills of exchange, insurance, master and servant, carriers, etc. this omission .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 23 2009 (HC)

Promising Exports Limited and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2009(168)LC253(Calcutta),2009(243)ELT3(Cal)

..... within [six months] from the date of the order, with a view to rectifying any mistake apparent from the record, amend any order passed by it under sub-section (1) and shall make such amendments if the mistake is brought to its notice by the [commissioner of central excise] or the other party to the appeal: ..... wherever the remaining two customs cases are concerned, the said provisions 35c(2a) and 35f should be read as sections 129b(2a) and 129e of the customs act respectively.6. the issues which fall for consideration are i) whether the appellate tribunal was justified in passing orders dismissing the appeals for non-compliance of its ..... of india and ors. were moved challenging the orders passed in appeals by the appellate tribunal directing predeposit under section 35f or under section 129e of the customs act upon notice to the respondents including the appellate tribunal. during the pendency of the writ petitions, appeals were dismissed by the appellate tribunal for non-compliance of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 2011 (HC)

Jai Mica Supply Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, West Ben ...

Court : Kolkata

..... the exported goods and merchandise are found to be of the nature of the processed minerals as indicated in twelfth schedule of the amended act, those should get the benefit of deduction. 12. the aforesaid amended provision has been given effect to not retrospectively but prospectively from the next assessment year. thus, from the next assessment year, the ..... substantial questions of law: 1) whether on a true and proper interpretation of clause (b) of sub section (2) of section 80hhc of the it act, 1961 prior to its amendment with effect from april 01, 1991, the export of fabricated mica products, namely, fabricated mica electronic components was not eligible for deduction under section 80hhc and ..... export out of india of such goods and merchandise and the value of such goods or merchandise declared in the shipping bill or bill of export as referred to in sub-section (1) of section 50 of the customs act, 1962 (52 of 1962), shall, for the purpose of this section, be deemed to be the sale .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 1917 (PC)

Kali Das Chaudhuri and ors. Vs. Srimati Danpadi Sundari Dassee

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 43Ind.Cas.893

..... of one of the partners. consequently, at the trial, the plaintiff found himself in a position of considerable embarrassment and so he asked for and obtained leave to amend the plaint by the insertion of two paragraphs. one of these paragraphs recited that the suit was saved from the bar no limitation by reason of the acknowledgment contained ..... the partnership business, because it says in the first paragraph that the defendants (setting oat the names) and the plaintiff agreed to carry on business in calcutta in copartner ship: 'and that it was agreed that on the death of any of the saba chowdhury partners the heir or heirs of such deceased partner will take his place and ..... bring an action within the time specified in the schedule; whereas if we were not to grant the amendment, his suit might be barred by the limitation act. for these reasons i do not think it right and just to allow the amendment to be made.17. with regard to the question of knowledgment, that depends upon section 19 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 2010 (HC)

Akshat Commercial Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Kalpana Chakraborty and ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... was then said by the applicant that under section 8 every application pending before the revenue officer after the commencement of section 7 of the west bengal land reforms act, 1972 (amendment act) stood transferred to and was to be disposed of by the munsif having jurisdiction in relation to the area in which the land is situated and on such ..... be dealt with from the stage at which it was so transferred and shall be disposed of in accordance with the provisions of the wblra, as amended by the west bengal land reforms (amendment) act, 1972. it was submitted that it is clear therefore that the application before the munsif is nothing but the same application or nature of application ..... . after the decision of the supreme court in the case of mardia chemicals ltd. (supra), the language of section 17 of the sarfaesi act was amended and instead of appeal the word 'application' was introduced in the section, although, the marginal note was not changed.17. in the subsequent decision of the supreme .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 08 1880 (PC)

Toponidhee Dhirj Gir GosaIn Vs. Sreeputty Sahanee

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1880)ILR5Cal832

..... relating to the competency of the court in which the former suit is heard remain the same in the new code, and the amending act has made no alteration in this respect.27. the doctrine laid down by peacock, c.j., was not referred to in any ..... on behalf of the appellant. but as regards the residue of the estate, the appellant argues: 1st that under act x of 1877 (the civil procedure code), as amended by act xii of 1879, the question of the heirship of the appellant was not directly in issue in the suit in ..... is, that the munsif's court was not a court of competent jurisdiction within the meaning of section 13 of the code as amended. it is argued that, as the munsif was not competent to try a suit for the recovery of the whole estate of the ..... his finding to the chelaship of the plaintiff, yet i think it must be treated as a finding against the plaintiff's heir-ship as well. the judge, in commencing his examination of the plaintiff's evidence, expressly states that he is dealing with the issue .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 2011 (HC)

Ms. Bhura Exports Ltd. Vs. the Income Tax Officer (Tds) Ward 57 (2) Ko ...

Court : Kolkata

..... the concept of change of opinion stands obliterated with effect from 1-4-1989 i.e. after substitution of section 147 of the income tax act, 1961 by the direct tax laws (amendment) act, 1987. in answering the above question, the bench observed as follows: on going through the changes, quoted above, made to section 147 of ..... the act, we find that, prior to the direct tax laws (amendment) act, 1987, reopening could be done under the above two conditions and fulfilment of the said conditions alone conferred jurisdiction on the assessing officer to ..... from the common rule, qui facit per alium facit per se. therefore, in applying the provisions contained in section 201 of the act where the previous bar of limitation was lifted by amendment and there was no period of limitation fixed for exercising such power at the relevant point of time, no question of invoking a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 2011 (HC)

Duncans Industries Limited Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, W.B.

Court : Kolkata

..... /- in respect of the garden tea business? 4. therefore, the only question that falls for determination in this appeal is whether in view of the amended provision of sub-section (3) of section 80hhc of the act, the appellant is entitled to the benefit of calculation on the basis of separate computation as was accepted in respect of earlier year under the ..... the deduction under section 80hhc having regard to the provisions of sub-section (3) as in force during that year and in view of the amendment in sub-section (3) of the 80hhc by the finance act, 1990 with effect from april 1, 1991, the tribunal declined to grant relief to the assessee for the assessment year 1991-92. 3. being dissatisfied .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //