Skip to content

Matrimonially - Judgment Search Results

Sep 05 2008

Bharat Matrimony Com. P. Ltd. Vs. People Interactive (i) Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-05-2008

Reported in: AIR2009Mad78; 2009(41)PTC709(Mad)

a common system to cater to the needs of the matrimonial alliance seekers. A very Common IVR system which is in


Jun 23 2006

Bharat Matrimony Com. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Service Tax

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Jun-23-2006

Reported in: (2007)6STT85

of providing matrimonial service from portals/websites. They operate and update matrimonial information on their 14 portals/websites in the name and style


Jan 07 2016

Bharat Matrimony.Com Pvt. Ltd. Vs. People Interactive (I) Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-07-2016

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.2142 OF2007BHARAT MATRIMONY.COM APPELLANT PVT. LTD. VERSUS PEOPLE...


May 30 2014

“The Matrimonial Dispute Between the Parties Had Vs. State of Punjab ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-30-2014

motion, the following order was passed by this Court:- “The matrimonial dispute between the parties had been referred to the Mediation


Jan 24 2013

Present: Mr.R.S.Dhaliwal Advocate Vs. Matrimonial Dispute.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-24-2013

objection if the present criminal litigation arising out of a matrimonial dispute is quashed. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that


Sep 30 2011

Re: in the Matter of Matrimonial Disputes Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Sep-30-2011

Reported in: 2012(3)KLT49(SN)(C.No.50)

institution of marriage, an effort be first made for reconciling matrimonial disputes by mediation before steps can be taken for prosecuting


May 02 2014

“counsel Contends That the Matrimonial Dispute Vs. State of Punjab - ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-02-2014

order was passed by this Court: “Counsel contends that the matrimonial dispute between the parties has since been settled and even


Oct 29 2012

M/S. Bharat Matrimony.Com Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by Its Director J. Murugavel ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-29-2012

(PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›




Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial