Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: maruti limited acquisition and transfer of undertakings act 1980 chapter vi miscellaneous Page 1 of about 132 results (0.226 seconds)

Feb 26 2014 (HC)

M/S. Shivraj Fine Art Litho Works and Others Vs. the State of Maharash ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... permissible grounds. 35. a similar enactment, which was a subject matter of challenge before this court, being maharashtra central india spinning, weaving and manufacturing company limited, the empress mills, nagpur (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act, 1986 came to be challenged before the apex court in the case of rashtriyamill mazdoor sangh, through its president vs. ..... of article 14 of the constitution. as held by the apex court in a catena of cases, acquisition of property with no compensation is not permissible in law. 46. the apex court in the case of k.t. plantation private limited and another vs. state of karnataka {(2011} 9 scc 1) has observed thus : 189) ..... would continue to be fastened on the petitioners. the net effect of it would be acquisition of the undertaking at no compensation. 50. as held by the constitution bench of the apex court in the case of k.t. plantation private limited and another vs. state of karnataka {(2011) 9 scc 1), there is a distinction .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 08 2000 (HC)

M/S. Thiru Muruga Finance Rep. by Its Partner Sri V. Thirunavukkarasu, ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2000(2)CTC609

..... bankruptcy and insolvency.entry 11-a:- administration of justice; constitution and organisation of all courts except the supreme court and the high courts.entry 42:- acquisition and requisitioning of property.entry 46:- jurisdiction and powers of all courts, except supreme court, with respect to any of the matters in this list.' ..... banking laws (amendment) act, 1983, is not violative of arts. 14 and 19 of the constitution. there is nothing demonstrably irrelevent or perverse in limiting in section 45s the number of depositors that an individual, firm or association could accept. ............... ...............the business of acceptance of deposits from the public does ..... case the government has been clothed with such authority conferring judicial power on the government and the power conferred is unguided. likewise, no time limit has been prescribed for receipt of the orders of the government by the competent authority, hence according to him such conferment of unguided power invalidates .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 05 2005 (HC)

M. Babu Rao and ors. Vs. Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies/Of ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2005(4)ALD582; 2005(4)ALT327; [2005]126CompCas708(AP); [2005]63SCL339(AP)

..... the financial assistance granted by any bank or financial institution and includes a person who becomes borrower of a securitisation company or reconstruction company consequent upon acquisition by it of nay rights or interest of any bank or financial institution in relation to such financial assistance.(i) 'debts recovery tribunal' means ..... entry being expressed in a broad designation indicating the contour of plenary power must receive a meaning conducive to the widest amplitude, subject however to limitations inherent in the federal scheme which distributes legislative power between the union and the constituent units. but the field of 'banking' cannot be extended to ..... article 246 and this position is normatively well established. the abstinence of the parliament or the legislature of a state from legislating to the full limit of its powers would not have the effect of transferring to the other legislative body the legislative power exclusively assigned to a legislature. the inherent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 07 1990 (SC)

Ashoka Marketing Ltd. and Another Vs. Punjab National Bank and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1991SC855; [1992]74CompCas482(SC); JT1990(3)SC417; 1990(2)SCALE200; (1990)4SCC406; [1990]3SCR649

..... that in r.c. cooper v. union of india : [1970]3scr530 this court, while referring to nationalised banks constituted under the provisions of the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) ordinance, 1969, has treated the nationalised banks as corporations.22. while construing the expression 'corporation' in section 2(e)(2)(ii) ..... authorities, and it is usually incorporated by a public general act of parliament. a private corporation is a corporation formed for profit e .g. a limited company, and it is usually incorporated under a statutory enactment. after the second world war there has been development of a new pattern of public corporations ..... contained in the punjab act were similar to those contained in the 1958 act. keeping in view the decision of this court in northern india caterers private limited's case (supra), parliament enacted public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) amendment act, 1968 whereby the 1958 act was amended and section 10e was introduced .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 14 2000 (HC)

Sadanand S. Varde and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2000(4)ALLMR510; 2001(1)BomCR261; [2001]247ITR609(Bom)

..... and secretarial services pvt. ltd. v. union of india, : air1988sc1708 , was pressed into service to contend that a bank constituted under the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act, 1970, though materially controlled by the central government, has a distinct personality of its own and its property cannot be said ..... , whether they be high courts exercising jurisdiction under article 226, or the supreme court under article 32, is virtually limitless except for self-imposed limitations in the interest of administration of justice and the dictates of prudence. a public interest litigation is not adversary in nature, but is intended to ..... have other objectives than mere environmental protection. that the petitioners are challenging the amalgamation of the two companies, namely, enjay estates private limited and enjay hotels private limited, and urging contravention of the order made under section 20 of the urban land ceiling act which has nothing to do with environmental .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 2011 (SC)

K.T. Plantation Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... acquired or requisitioned by the state, continues to be available in the form of an implied condition of the power of the state to legislate on acquisition or requisition of property while all the exceptions and limitations set up against and around it in article 31, 31a and 31b have disappeared. learned author opined that article 300a will require obviously, that the ..... law must be a valid law and no law of acquisition or requisitioning can be valid unless the acquisition or requisition is for a public purpose, unless there is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 1987 (HC)

Rashtriya Mill Mazdoor Sangh Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1988(1)BomCR188; 1987MhLJ955

..... 1986. it has come into force on 3rd october, 1986 when the governor of the state promulgated the central india spinning, weaving and manufacturing company limited, the empress mills, nagpur (acquisition and transfer of undertaking) ordinance, 1986 ('the ordinance').3. the scheme of the act :section 2 lists the definitions. the term 'appointed day ..... to enact a law to achieve the objects stated above, the governor of maharashtra promulgated the central india spinning, weaving and manufacturing company limited, the empress mills nagpur (acquisition and transfer of undertaking) ordinance 1986 on the 3rd october, 1986. this bill is intended to replace the ordinance by an act of ..... a. mohta, j. 1. the empress mills, nagpur---a textile undertaking has been nationalised by the central india spinning, weaving and manufacturing company limited, the empress mills, nagpur (acquisition and transfer of undertaking) act, 1986, ('the act'). constitutional validity of sections 9(2), 10(2), 12(1) and 26 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 05 1987 (SC)

Life Insurance Corporation of India and ors. Vs. S.S. Srivastava and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1987SC1527; [1987(54)FLR750]; JT1987(2)SC529; (1987)IILLJ414SC; 1987(1)SCALE975; 1988Supp(1)SCC1; [1987]3SCR180; 1987(2)LC681(SC)

..... banking companies whose services were taken over on nationalisation as regards the age of retirement arose for consideration. the scheme of section 12(2) of the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act, 1970 and the scheme of section 11(1) of the act, which is under consideration before us, were the same. in govindarajulu ..... may also refer to one decision of the madras high court and another decision of the calcutta high court which arose under the provisions of the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act, 1970 (act 5 to 1970) where again the claim of employees of the banks in question who joined their service after nationalisation ..... stand at par. in the workmen case itself, this court did not extend the benefit of superannuation at the age of 60 to all clerical staff but limited the same to that category of employees working in the refinery division, bombay. classification on the basis of reasonable differentia is a well known basis and we .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 1973 (SC)

Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and ors.Vs. State of Kerala and anr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC1461; (1973)4SCC225; [1973]SuppSCR1

..... reasonable restrictions on the individual's liberty. the exclusion of article 31(2) is to introduce the consideration of social justice in the matter of acquisition. directive principles are not limited to agrarian reforms. directive principles are necessary for the uplift and growth of industry in the country.1080. article 31(4) and 31(6) ..... do not satisfy these requirements and are, therefore, unconstitutional." (emphasis supplied) this argument was rejected in these words "in the face of the limitations on the state's power of compulsory acquisition thus incorporated in the body of the constitution, from which "estates" alone are excluded, it would, in my opinion, be contrary to elementary ..... it was observed in chiranjit lal chowdhauri v. the union of india and ors. [1950] s.c.r. 869 at p. 902 that one limitation imposed upon acquisition or taking possession of private property which is implied in the clause is that such taking must be for a public purpose. mahajan j., (later chief .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 2018 (SC)

Indian Young Lawyers Association Vs. The State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... maintenance of institutions for purposes of a religious and charitable nature; (ii) managing the affairs of the denomination in matters of religion; (iii) ownership and acquisition of immovable property; and (iv) administration of the property in accordance with law. article 26, as in the case of article 25(1), is prefaced ..... and non-protected religious beliefs or practices: the key distinction between adjudicating religious freedom claims by examining whether the restrictions are permissible under the limitation clauses and adjudicating claims through a definitional test is that the latter precludes a religious freedom claim by determining that it falls outside the ..... untouchability and is hence violative of article 17 of the constitution. the contention has been countered by the argument that article 17 is specifically limited to caste-based untouchability and cannot be expanded to include gender-based exclusion. understanding these rival positions requires the court to contemplate on the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //