Marriage Laws Amendment Act 2001 Section 7 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: marriage laws amendment act 2001 section 7 Court: karnataka Year: 2018 Page 1 of about 254 results (3.139 seconds)Pushpalatha N V Vs. V Padma
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-25-2018
..... the marriage of the plaintiff much before commencement of 22 central amendment to section 6 of hindu succession act has ..... 01 2004 passed in o s no 16271 2001 on the file of the xxviii additional city ..... feature of ancestral property according to mitakshara law is that the sons grandsons and great grandsons ..... and others vs basavaraj and others ilr2016kar 3604 7 the learned counsel for the respondents sri .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri Malledevirappa Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-02-2018
of section 209 chapter xv of the karnataka panchyath raj act 1993 deals with that 10 the grama panchayat may acquire act 17 13 3 however taking into consideration the subsequent amendment to section 209 of the act the learned single judge the prior sanction of the taluk panchayath before initiating any action for the disposal of the property both movable and immovable canceling the bid which is contrary to the proviso to section 209 of the act 17 13 3 however taking into resolution does not cure initial illegality and therefore under the 7 provisions of section 209 of the karnataka panchayat raj act
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri B Z Zameer Ahmed Khan Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-07-2018
writ appeals are filed under section4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order dated244 2018 passed by otiose and defeat the objects and intent of the 52nd amendment of the constitution the purpose and object of the rules objects and reasons of the bill which finally became the act of 1985 whereby the schedule x was added to the for r8 and r9 these writ appeals are filed under section4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the andhra pradesh dated 28 9 2015 in w p no 7217 2015 on a question relating to the power of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP Umesh Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-09-2018
with law and provisions of section 7 4 of the act but the same has not been done therefore he would at the grass root level by virtue of seventy fourth amendment to the constitution part ix a providing for establishment of referred to in clause 1 of section 2 of the act 30 clause 4 of section 7 of the act prescribes backward classes the next census will be in the year 2001 there is no way to reserve seats for backward classes bodies municipalities corporations etc in accordance with the provisions of section 7 2 of the karnataka municipal corporations act 1976 as above it is relevant to consider the provisions of section 7 of the karnataka municipal corporations act 1976 which reads as
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Kotarki Constructions pvt.ltd. Vs. The Asst. Commissioner of Incom ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-02-2018
respondent assessing authority to invoke section 147 148 of the act for reassessment for the a y 2010 11 in the the act we find that prior to the direct tax laws amendment act 1987 reopening could be done under the above eligible for the tax benefit under section 80 ia this amendment will take retrospective effect from 1st april 2000 and will claiming deduction u s 80 ia of the income tax act 1961 in respect of works shown against each is worked sanmathi is that the explanation substituted by the finance act 2001 with retrospective effect from 01 04 2000 per se confers and we request you to allow the deduction under first section 80ia of rs 1 19 95 895 the assessee also vs the asst commissioner of income tax another 25 28 7 2 amendment made by the amending act 1989 to reintroduce
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri Jayaram Vs. Agricultural Produce Marketing
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-17-2018
required under sub section 2 of section 17 of the act was issued to the petitioner and despite receipt of said date of karnataka commencement agricultural marketing regulation and certain other laws amendment act 1991 stand transferred to the director of agricultural period of three calendar months in other words after 1965 amendment in the proviso to section 3 25 it is not 2 of the karnataka agricultural produce marketing regulations and development act 1966 act for short on the ground that petitioner had and also on the ground that clause b of sub section 1 of section 17 of the act is not attracted has also sought for dismissal of the writ petition 7 7 i have heard the arguments of sri mudith kundlia learned
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri Srinath Mangalore Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-26-2018
area the karnataka municipal corporations and certain other laws amendment act 1984 amended the karnataka municipal corporation act 1976 karnataka municipalities bangalore metropolitan area the karnataka municipal corporations and certain other laws amendment act 1984 amended the karnataka municipal corporation act 1976 metropolitan area the karnataka municipal corporations and certain other laws amendment act 1984 amended the karnataka municipal corporation act 1976 karnataka the bangalore development authority act 1976 c the karnataka municipalities act 1964 d the bangalore water supply and sewerage board act police notices have been issued to the petitioners 44 under section 161 of cr p c on 22 4 2013 asking 18 4 2013 and all further proceedings in crime no 76 2013 registered by bmtf police station in so far as
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri K L Venugopal Vs. Smt Vimala K Venugopal
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-23-2018
to pay the court fee under section 40 of the act suffers from any infirmity warranting interference dealing with the factual 24 d of the karnataka court fees and suits valuation act accordingly it was held that the court fee paid by to pay an ad valorem court fee as provided under section 7 iv c of the act 8 section 7 iv o late k l venugopal aged about49years petitioners4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 sri channaraya k v s
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Kap Chem Limited Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-08-2018
seventh schedule to the constitution of india to make appropriate laws to regulate the manufacture and sale of industrial alcohol including of declaration of the karnataka excise excise duties and fees amendment rules 2001 dated 09 02 2001 as un constitutional cannot 01 04 2007 hence your request letters dated 06 08 2001 21 01 2003 04 08 2003 16 01 2014 15 claiming the refund of such fees paid by the petitioner 7 he urged that the hon ble supreme court has not
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Smt Meenakshi Devi Avaru
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-30-2018
..... drastic amendment with effect from 01 04 1993 and the word assets defined in section 2 ea of the act ..... out from time to time for functions like marriages and other public functions from which huge income ..... permission to conduct the activity date 25 01 2001 this petition was called respondent s on for ..... can be taken vii the learned counsel for the revenue also relied upon several case laws 19 we will .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT