Manipulation - Year 2002 - Judgments

Jun 20 2002 (TRI)

Bpl Limited Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Jun-20-2002

..... the appellant company particularly during the period between april and may 1998 suspecting price manipulation the respondent caused an investigation based on the findings of the investigation spanning ..... shri harshad mehta by aiding abetting and instrumental in effecting transactions resulting in market manipulations he submitted that conspiracy abatement etc involve sound intend he stated that the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 20 2002 (TRI)

Videocon International Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Jun-20-2002

..... sebi conducted investigations to ascertain whether the unusual market behaviour was due to any manipulations the investigations indicated that the market behaviour relating to the appellant company s ..... buying selling or otherwise dealing in securities in a fraudulent manner prohibition against market manipulation is covered by regulation 4 regulation 5 is on prohibition of misleading statements .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 08 2002 (TRI)

Paresh M. Parekh, Yogesh B. Vs. the Chairman, Securities and

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Oct-08-2002

..... had entered into the transaction intentionally to facilitate shri gupta to indulge in market manipulation market manipulation resulting in defrauding the investors is a serious charge which has to be ..... 1996 investigations were initiated into irregularities in the public issue of mlcl and price manipulation in the scrip immediately thereafter vide chairman s order dated june 25 1998 investigations .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 22 2002 (TRI)

Sebi Vs. Sound Craft Industries Ltd.

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Aug-22-2002

..... the then prevailing trends and conditions in the stock market and cannot be termed as manipulative c the following allegations of the investigation officer are totally unsubstantiated i that a consideration ..... regulatory authorities since inception itself speaks volumes of its levels of skill and care c manipulation the so called artificial volumes as alleged by the enquiry have neither distorted the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 20 2002 (FN)

Utah Vs. Evans

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-20-2002

..... that the principle concern was that the constitution establish a standard resistant to manipulation as justice story later observed apportion ing representatives among the states according to ..... adopted the words actual enumeration to preclude the availability of methods that permit political manipulation additionally hot deck imputation is properly understood as an estimation which by definition .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 05 2002 (TRI)

Harinarayan G. Bajaj and Rahul H. Vs. the Chairman, Securities and

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Sep-05-2002

..... the respondents have chosen to proceed against the appellants the victims of market manipulation ignoring the villains who manipulated the market 17 shri t n subrahmanian learned counsel appearing for the ..... also investigated the role played by various persons intermediaries in connection with the price manipulation in the scrip of arbl and initiated further proceedings as stated in the preceding .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 25 2002 (TRI)

R.B. Khandelwal (Director of Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Sep-25-2002

..... has also proceeded against the said firm learned counsel submitted that if anand securities had manipulated the market the proceedings should have been initiated against them in the first instance and ..... be taken against him under the 1992 regulations for the alleged participation in the market manipulation he responded to the notice by making written and oral submissions before the enquiry officer .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 19 2002 (TRI)

Roopram Sharma Vs. the Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Sep-19-2002

..... of fraudulent and unfair trade practices relating to securities market regulations 1995 dealing with the manipulation in the securities came into force only in october 1995 and therefore it is not ..... two years cannot serve as a preventive measure to debilitate the appellant indulging in market manipulation 33 similarly by no stretch of imagination the said direction can be considered even remedial .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 27 2002 (TRI)

Sebi Vs. Shivalik Loha Mills Ltd.

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Jul-27-2002

..... first year of the broking activities of the member they were not aware of the manipulation activities etc especially when the member himself has been instrumental in the price rigging of ..... established that the member has failed to exercise due skill and diligence and indulged in manipulative trading member also did not adhere to the time schedule governing spot transactions provided under .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 22 2002 (TRI)

D. Suryanarayana Shastri, D. Ram Vs. Dasika Industrial Chemicals

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Decided on: May-22-2002

..... the marketing recovery of dues liaison with the government departments etc the second respondent started manipulating the accounts to enrich himself and failed to make payments to raw material suppliers ..... main acts of oppression and mismanagement relate to the illegal allotment of the impugned shares manipulation of accounts non holding of statutory meetings illegal induction of respondents 3 to 5 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Manipulation - Judgment Search Results