Malnad Area Development Board Act 1991 Section 11 - Judgment Search Results

N.G. Puttaswamy and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2)KCCR1201; 2009(2)KLJ521; 2009(3)AIRKarR65

..... under the karnataka municipalities act 1964 or the hyderabad karnataka areas development board constituted under the hyderabad karnataka area development board act 1993 or malnad area development board constituted under the malnad area development board act 1991 or the bayaluseeme development board constituted under the bayaluseeme development board act 1994 i in case .....

Oberoi Constructions Private Limited a Company Registered Under the Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR546; 2008(3)BomCR408; (2008)110BOMLR951

users such as industrial commercial residential etc and only two areas not covered by the said notices notification as forest reserve and the development plan proposal and user indicated therein the development plan reservation proposal designation and permissible users qua several lands oppressive again and again said viscount simonds l c this board has insisted that in construing enacted words we are not mulund notification under section 35 1 of the indian forest act has also been issued i say that since the mutation development plan of 1967 and the revised development plan of 1991 reliance is also placed on d c regulations 1991 whereunder reply filed on behalf of the state to contend that sections 35 1 and 35 3 are independent and exclusive of the same was dismissed 141 the application was filed on 11th march 1991 before the sub divisional officer deputy collector panvel

Jyoti Pratapsingh Chadel and Others Vs. Collector, Nanded and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

the governor may having regard to the size of tile area and the municipal services being provided or proposed to be ii the authority constituted under the maharashtra housing and area development act 1976 iii the nagpur improvement trust constituted under the ncp is duly registered political party with election commission of india and election commission of maharashtra and that district president of a panchayat samiti has become subject to disqualification under this act the question shall be referred i in the case of act the same quite eloquently surfaces from the text of section 7 of the mlamd act which reads thus 7 if the full bench of this court in writ petition no 11278 of 2012 and other connected matters in paragraph no 47a

In Re: Europlast India Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under Companies Act ...

Court : Mumbai

jagdish khandelwal s o gauri shaijic 1 33 safdarjung development area new delhi 110 016 06 06 92 16 08 96 he joined service of k company as a research and development chemist and thereafter was transferred to lab scales chemicals and expected under the order of the court instead the then board of directors of the e company passed resolution on 28th exercising jurisdiction under section 391 and 392 of the companies act held parliament has in its wisdom conferred a power of sub section 1 provides that nothing in the said sub section shall affect any law for the time being in force o m l arorah 130 mohan garden uttam nagar newdelhi 110 059 30 09 04 3 mr harshmani pant s o

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

a modern liberalized economy and corresponding state retreat in key areas of economic activities the prevalent laws governing concentration of market specified aera also has to determine the amount of the development fees in respect of major airports determine the amount of for failure to furnish information return or report to the board section 15a inserted with retrospective effect from 25 01 1995 had to decide whether the enactment of the administrative tribunals act 1985 and the divestment of all jurisdiction of all courts with competition issues in the wake of economic reforms since 1991 it was felt that this act had become obsolete in 2005 6 scc321 the other allied aspect with respect to section 27 b is that it provides no guidance or guidelines counsel dealt with the provisions of the sebi act section 11 delineating the regulatory functions of sebi section 15a to 15ja

Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai Vs. Property Owners Associatio ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

plant room xv water treatment plant room 3 the carpet area of any of the following items shall not be reckoned proportion to the higher floor space index or transfer of development right proposed to be utilized and approved under the building corporation of the powers duties assets and liabilities of the board of trustees for the improvement of the city of bombay 1b of section 154 of the mumbai municipal corporation act act no bom iii of 1888 and of all other powers of the powers conferred by clause e s of sub section 1a and sub section 1b of section 154 of the learned senior advocate appeared for certain entities in ia nos 110990 of 2019 163118 of 2019 and 160953 of 2019 and

M/S. Shreeram Construction and Another Vs. Maharashtra State Electrici ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1997Bom167

the board that they had plans for developing the huge area of 5 acres by constucting more buildings and they would board in these circumstances if the respondent had undertaken any development for supply of electricity at its own cost it would nov 1985 and the consequential demand made by the respondent board mainly on the following four grounds i the impugned public the respondent is also a licensee under the indian electricity act 1910 and are bound by the scheme of the schedule entitled to the old charges at the date of registration section 31 4 since repealed tarun chatterjee h l dattu jj

Arvind V. Aswal and Others Arihant Realtors and Others

Court : National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

carried out on the plot which is declared as slum area under the provisions of maharashtra slum areas improvement clearance and ltd residential cum commercial project under the slum rehabilitation authoritys development scheme the housing project was to be undertaken on plot consent for establishment shall be obtained from maharashtra pollution control board under air and water act and a copy shall be the provisions of maharashtra slum areas improvement clearance and redevelopment act 1971 and the project property is declared as slum on 5 of the limitation act read with proviso appended to section 16 of the national green tribunal act 2010 7 before 2013 and in marathi vernacular newspaper of 31st may 2013 11 we have perused the affidavit filed on behalf of the

Lakshmi Dutt Vs. Gopal Dutt

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1974All316

area to which the notification relates hereinafter called the notified area namely a all rights title and interest of hissedars in that in this second appeal we must notice a new development which arose in consequence of the enforcement of the kumaun the idol s property relying upon the dictum of the board in 1875 2 ind app 145 21 skinner v kunwar be examined in the new act i e the limitation act 1963 it has been defined in section 2 i the right to sue to recover the emoluments i think that section 28 of the limitation act will operate to extinguish not may hold the latter the board s order no 704 11 18 of the 29th april 1886 laid it down that

Sri Govind B. Ron, S/O Sri Bhima Rao Ron Vs. State of Karnataka Rep. b ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2009KAR3805; 2010(1)KarLJ319:2009(6)AIRKarR454(D.B)

1986 for 20 years for moulding sand mineral over an area of 25 in kuruvathi vg hadagali taluk bellary district on of m l will be taken under the mines minerals development regulation act 1957 and mineral concession rules 1960 yours faithfullysd fee government of karnatakavi clearance from karnataka state pollution control boardyou are hereby directed to furnish above documents clearances within 30 moef government of india for environmental clearance of the proposed activity 9 therefore unless the application made by the petitioner is at such commencement provided further that nothing in this sub section shall apply to any prospecting operations undertaken by the geological rule 24 a 6 has to be given effect to 11 in the result except to direct the respondents to consider