Court : Karnataka
..... be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court ..... of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of ..... . petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 ..... sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru ..... ( .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court ..... of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of ..... . petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 ..... sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru ..... ( .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court ..... of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of ..... . petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 ..... sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru ..... ( .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court ..... of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of ..... . petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 ..... sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru ..... ( .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court ..... of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of ..... . petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 ..... sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru ..... ( .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court ..... of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of ..... . petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 ..... sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru ..... ( .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court ..... of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of ..... . petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 ..... sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru ..... ( .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court ..... of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of ..... . petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 ..... sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru ..... ( .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court ..... of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of ..... . petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 ..... sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru ..... ( .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court ..... of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of ..... . petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 ..... sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru ..... ( .....
Tag this Judgment!