Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
..... of action as decided in this order.therefore with a view to protect the interest of investors and securities market from further such acts, in exercise of the powers delegated to me by the sebi board in terms of section 19 of the securities and exchange board of india act, 1992 read with section 11, 11b and 11(4)(b) thereof and section 19 of depositories act, 1996, pending enquiry and passing of final order, i hereby issue the following directions, by way of ad interim, ..... - 0601000173167 1301240000083860 (cdsl) santosh jaywant ahire, g-5, janabai mohite chawl, kirolgaon, ghatkopar (w), bombay hdfc, fort, mumbai - 0601000173287 1301240000088761 (cdsl) santosh bhimrao bansode, htmt 272, bhimanagar htmt area-5, lal bahadur shastri marg (w), ghatkopar (w), bombay hdfc, ghatkopar, mumbai - 1181000047210 1301240000089254 (cdsl) santosh mahadev prabhu, t-7, saiyyad gadakori chawl, r.b.kadam road (n), kurla, bombay hdfc, fort, mumbai - ..... . in the recent past while examining off-market transactions in the ipos of yes bank ltd('ybl') and infrastructure development finance company limited ('idfc'), it came to the notice of sebi that certain entities had cornered ipo shares reserved for retail applicants by making applications in the retail ..... above dematerialized account-holder of hdfc bank, it is seen that the voters id card produced as identity shows age as on 01-01-1991 as 81 years which means that as on the date of opening of demat account, the age of the bo was around .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
..... he expressed enthusiasm on behalf of the board for working with the indian institute in developing and applying their program and learning more about the financial markets in ..... result of the aforesaid substantial duration, extent and geographical area of use, promotion and registration of the cfa marks, the knowledge and recognition enjoyed by them in the relevant sections of the public throughout the world including india and the record of successful enforcement of their rights in the cfa marks, the cfa marks qualify as well-known marks under the trade marks act and thus entitled to be protected. 13. ..... and was published by tata mc graw hill publishing company limited was relied on by the appellant it is worth mentioning the wordings in chapter 2 under the title strategic alliance- 1. ..... not a member of the respondents board of governors till 1991. 44. ..... further submitted that if the first respondent was acting in bad faith, the appellants predecessor would be the last person to keep quite without taking any positive action against the first respondent instead of allowing the first respondent to continue its programme even after the withdrawal of their assistance in the year 1991. ..... all the above, we are of the opinion that there had been an understanding between the appellant and the first respondent since the year 1985 to 1991 when the chairman mr. ..... however, around 1991 difference arose between the appellant and the first respondent over the scope, content and nature of cfa programme .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court ..... of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of ..... . petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 ..... sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru ..... ( .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court ..... of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of ..... . petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 ..... sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru ..... ( .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court ..... of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of ..... . petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 ..... sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru ..... ( .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court ..... of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of ..... . petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 ..... sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru ..... ( .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court ..... of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of ..... . petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 ..... sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru ..... ( .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court ..... of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of ..... . petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 ..... sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru ..... ( .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court ..... of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of ..... . petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 ..... sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru ..... ( .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court ..... of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of ..... . petitioner claims to have entered into joint development agreement on 15.03.1995 with hanumanthaiah and family to develop the property bearing sy.no.37 measuring 6 acres 21 guntas which is morefully described in the petition schedule and has sought for quashing of the order dated 08.03.2017 ..... sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd ..... aged about63years nayinady, malnad grama, nemmaru ..... ( .....
Tag this Judgment!