Majority Shareholder - Judgment Search Results

In Re: Larsen and Toubro Limited

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [2004]121CompCas523(Bom); (2004)3CompLJ304(Bom); [2004]54SCL461(Bom)

..... majority shareholders financial institutions competent authorities have taken note of all these aspects and granted no objection ..... shareholders or where the shareholders have unanimously approved of the scheme of amalgamation i see no reason why the court at the instance of the regional director of the company law board should examine the question of fairness or unfairness of valuation the main .....

Miheer H. Mafatlal Vs. Mafatlal Industries Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996VIIAD(SC)260; AIR1997SC506; [1996]87CompCas792(SC); JT1996(8)SC205; 1996(6)SCALE595; (1997)1SCC579; [1996]Supp6SCR1

..... that which exchange ratio is better is in the realm of commercial decision of well informed equity shareholders 40 of the majority shareholders were financial institutions who were supposed to be well versed on the aspect of valuation ..... pressed before us are already dealt with by us while considering the main points for determination in the earlier part of this judgment and therefore it is not .....

Core Healthcare Limited Vs. Nirma Limited

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [2007]138CompCas204(Guj); [2007]79SCL47(Guj)

..... realm of commercial decision of well informed equity shareholders 40 of the majority shareholders were financial institutions who were supposed to be well versed on the aspect of valuation ..... that a policy decision should be least interfered in judicial review because the policy decision or the final verdict in the meeting would reflect the general consensus 48 3 this judgement of the supreme .....

Maharashtra Power Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Dabhol Power Co. an ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR2004Bom38; (2004)1BOMLR833; [2003]117CompCas506(Bom)

..... by members who complain of the oppression even if they do not form the minority shareholders or the oppressors are not the majority shareholders v although ebrahimi was a partner nazar had made it perfectly clear that he did ..... quorum or summoning the general meeting of the company but for no other purpose the main purpose of regulation 75 is to ensure that the board does not become non functional .....

Kalinga Tubes Ltd. and ors. Vs. Shanti Prasad JaIn and ors.

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR1963Ori189

..... the value of the good will or know how of the company and the minority shareholder who urged by the majority shareholder s oppression petitions for a winding up order may in effect play his opponent s ..... judgment under appeal the learned judge had knocked down the allotment of 39 000 shares mainly on the ground of insufficiency and invalidity of the notice it is desirable to deal .....

Sri Ramdas Motor Transport Ltd. and ors. Vs. Karedla Suryanarayana and ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [2002]110CompCas193(AP)

..... orders under section 402 of the act if the acts of mismanagement alleged against the majority shareholders creates an apprehension in the minds of the minority shareholders even if they fail to establish the allegations levelled against them in the main petition as well as in c keeping the above principles in mind if one looks .....

Shanti Prasad JaIn Vs. Kalinga Tubes Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1965SC1535; [1965]35CompCas351(SC); (1965)1CompLJ193(SC); [1965]2SCR720

..... not defined it is possible by way of illustration to figure a situation in which majority shareholders by an abuse of their predominant voting power are treating the company and its affairs ..... groups held shares of the value of rs 21 lakhs in the company and the main provision of the agreement is that the share capital would be increased and the appellant .....

Enercon GmbH, Germany Vs. Wind World (India) Limited, Daman and Others ...

Court: Mumbai

..... shares the eg thereafter as a majority shareholder stopped the supplies to eil there was no prior intimation of stoppage of supplies the stoppage of supplies was ordered by dr wobben as a main shareholder of eil which is clear from ..... would take some time to go through the written submissions and then arrive at the verdict this process takes some time if one has to assimilate what is narrated in the .....

Westfort Hi-tech Hospital Ltd. and anr. Vs. V.S. Krishnan and ors.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: (2007)2CompLJ143(Ker); [2007]76SCL185(Ker)

..... their appointment was declared subsequently as invalid mainly this protection is for the outsiders but a shareholder also cannot be taken aback by setting aside a decision of the board done in good faith ..... appointment was declared subsequently as invalid mainly this protection is for the outsiders but a shareholder also cannot be taken aback by setting aside a decision of the board done in good .....

Jer Rutton Kavasmaneck @ Jer Jawahar Thadani and Another Vs. Gharda Ch ...

Court: Mumbai

..... be inconsistent with the provisions of companies act 1956 action taken by 1st respondent and majority shareholders in passing a resolution to delete article 57 was a simple corporate democracy and is ..... judge in the order dated 14th november 2008 88 mr bobde then submits that the main issue is about freetransferability of shares that issue for being answered must necessarily require a .....