Court : Karnataka
- 1 - WP No.3963 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE23D DAY OF MARCH, 2023 R BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION No.3963 OF2021(L-TER) BETWEEN: THE MANAGEMENT OF R.V. EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS RASHTREEYA SIKSHANA SAMITHI TRUST R V TEACHERS COLLEGE BUILDING2D BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BENGALURU56001 REPRESENTED BY ITS HONORARY SECRETARY MR A.V.S. MURTHY ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. K.R. ANAND., ADVOCATE) AND: MR S.J.KUMAR NO.34 5TH CROSS PUTTENAHALLI J.P. NAGAR, 7TH PHASE BENGALURU56007 RESPONDENT (BY Ms. AVANI CHOKSHI, ADVOCATE OF MANTHAN LAW) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS FROM THE HONBLE THIRD ADDITIONAL LABOUR COURT, BENGALURU IN SERIAL APPLICATION No.1/2017 IN REFERENCE No.51/2015 AND ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI AND/OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER AND QUASH AND SET ASIDE - 2 - WP No.3963 of 2021 THE IMPUGNED ORDER ANNEXURE-Q DATED3008/2018 PASSED BY3D ADDIT...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... .16 back undelivered. closed/dt.07. 10.16. 8 sh. p.k. bajaj sh. ashish id issued fictitious/pseudo anonymous cit rastogi, a dated complaint still connected files (exemption), 70, gandhi 25.02.16 taken during inspection on lucknow nagar, prince reminder 29.11.2017. road dated muradabad, 11.05.16. id u.p. neither received back nor page 18 of ..... back 29.06.16 undelivered till date. closed dated 07.10.16. 8 shri pramod bajaj, cit sh. ashish rastogi, a id issued dated 25.02.16. (exemption), lucknow 70, gandhi nagar, reminder dated 11.05.16. id prince road neither received back nor muradabad, u.p. responded. closed dated 29.08.16. 9 capt. p.k. bajaj addl. smt. renu .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... but free and fair elections have been recognised as an essential feature of the democratic apparatus by the judgments of this court as well.74. in indira nehru gandhi smt v. shri raj narain and another,45 justice hr khanna held in his opinion: all the seven judges [in kesavananda bharti case]. who constituted the majority ..... earliest possible moment or else those who suffer from inequality will blow up the structure of political democracy which we have so laboriously built up.143. in indira nehru gandhi smt. v. raj narain and another 143, this court adverted to the importance of elections in a democracy as follows: 198. democracy postulates that there should be ..... the cabinet secretary or secretary to the government of india or an equivalent rank, will be appointed. the supreme court in bhagwati prashad dixit ghorewala v rajiv gandhi rejected the contention that the cec should possess qualifications similar to that of a supreme court judge, despite being placed on par with them in terms of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... state government has enacted various legislations that inter alia regulate admission process in various institutions. for instance, jawaharlal nehru krishi vishwavidyalaya adhiniyam, rajiv gandhi prodyogiki vishwavidyalaya adhiniyam, rashtriya vidhi sansathan vishwavidyalaya adhiniyam, etc. were established by the state government in exercise of power under entry 25 of the ..... to centrally funded universities such as the babasaheb bhimrao ambedkar university act, 1994, the maulana azad national urdu university act, 1996, the indira gandhi national tribal university act, 2007, etc. the central government may have the power to regulate the admission process for centrally funded institutions like iits ..... court considered, inter alia, the question as to whether the gujarat university act, 1949, which authorized the university to prescribe gujarati or hindi or both as an exclusive medium of instruction and examination in the affiliated colleges, would infringe entry 66 of list i. one of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2965 OF2022Manik Majumder and Others Appellants Versus Dipak Kumar Saha (Dead) through Lrs. & Others Respondents JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 05.04.2018 passed by the High Court of Tripura at Agarthala in Regular Second Appeal No.01/2005, by which the High Court has allowed the said appeal preferred by the original plaintiffs and has decreed the suit by quashing and setting aside the concurrent findings recorded by both the courts below, the original defendants have preferred the present appeal. 12. The facts leading to the present appeal in a nutshell are as under: That one Braja Mohan Dey was the owner and in possession of Schedule A property. He was alleged to have taken a loan of Rs. 10,000/- from his tenant, namely, Dhirendra Chandra Saha, original plaintiff No.2. The original owner, Braja Mohan Dey went to East Pakistan. I...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (C) No.59 OF2013Association of Old Settlers of Sikkim and Ors. Appellant(s) Versus Union of India and Anr. Respondent(s) WITH WRIT PETITION (C) No.1283 OF2021Rapden Lepcha and Ors. Appellant(s) Versus Union of India and Anr. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. By way of this writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, the respective writ petitioners Association of Old Settlers of Sikkim and Others have prayed for an appropriate writ, direction or order 1 striking down Section 10(26AAA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act, 1961), more particularly, the definition of Sikkimese in Section 10 (26AAA) to the extent it excludes Indians who have settled in Sikkim prior to the merger of Sikkim with India on 26.04.1975. The petitioners have also prayed for an appropriate writ, order or direction striking down the Proviso to Section 10(26AAA) of the Act, 1961, insof...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... the workmen are being ensured social and economic justice. 92. therefore, three major breakthroughs happened, the first in kharak singh, the second in satwant singh and maneka gandhi (supra) and the third in bandhua mukti morcha (supra). the first breakthrough was the opinion, though of a minority, that physical restraint was not a necessary sine ..... of personal liberty and that even a psychological restraint may amount to deprivation of personal liberty. the second breakthrough was the opinion in satwant singh and maneka gandhi that the right of locomotion and to travel abroad are part of the right to personal liberty. the third breakthrough was the opinion in bandhua mukti ..... and documents kept in any premises, including a private place where such registers, books etc., are kept. taking cue from the decision in r. rajagopal and maneka gandhi, this court held in paragraphs 55 and 56 of the decision as follows: 55. the a.p. amendment permits inspection being carried out by the collector by .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... divan lastly submits that the right to life also includes the right to live with dignity. relying on the constitution bench judgment of this court in the case of maneka gandhi v. union of india13, he submits that the right to live with dignity also includes the right to travel abroad, especially to visit the son of the petitioner/applicant in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... , the same would be unreasonable. in this connection reference may be made to e.p. royappa v. state of tamil nadu [(1974) 4 scc3:1974. scc (l&s) 165]. , maneka gandhi v. union of india [(1978) 1 scc248 , ajay hasia v. khalid mujib sehravardi [(1981) 1 scc722:1981. scc (l&s) 258]. , r.d. shetty v. international airport authority of india .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... (ii). dr. shivani mehta, department of forensic medicine (iii). dr. jeevitesh khtida, department of radio diagnosis (iv). dr. ashawani, department of anatamy and (v). dr. satvinder singh, department of indira gandhi govt. dental college jammu (iggdc). the board of doctors so constituted examined the juvenile delinquent shubam sangra on 28.02.2018 and accordingly principal gmc jammu submitted the opinion of .....
Tag this Judgment!