Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: These W.Ps are filed praying to hold that there exist fraud and misrepresentation on the part of Respondent-4 society because of role of middlemen, as affirmed by G.V.K. Rao committee’s report specifically concerning the Respondent-4 society as well as consolidated report concerning house building co-operative society in Bangalore. To unduly influence State machinery/Government for unlawful advantage to enable the society carry out commercial dealings in lands to the benefit of bogus members as well as business entities to the utter injury of bonafide interests of the land owners/Petitioners.) This WP is filed praying to quash Ann-A 7 B the Prly. Notification issued under Section 4(1) Land Acquisition Act published in Karnataka Gazette dt.4.1.1985 for the benefit of R4 and also the final declaration issued u/sec. 6(1) of the Land Acquisition Act in RD 197 AQB 82 dt.22.9.1986 and published in Karnataka Gazette dt.25.9.1986 respectively in so far as they relate to the sche...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... division bench of five judges, in preference to bhut nath mate v. state of west bengal 1974crilj690 decided by a division bench of two judges. again in smt. indira nehru gandhi v. raj narain [1976]2scr347 beg, j held that the constitution bench of five judges was bound by the constitution bench of thirteen judges in his holiness kesavananda bharati sripadagalavaru .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... judges, in preference to bhut nath mate vs. state of west bengal 1974 cri. l.j. 690 decided by a division bench of two judges. again in smt. indira nehru gandhi vs. raj narain (1976) 2 scr 347 beg. j held that the constitution bench of five judges was bound by the constitution bench of thirteen judges in his holiness kesavananda .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... of the act gives an overriding effect to the provisions of the act. it enacts save as otherwise expressly provided in this act (a) any text, rile or interpretation of hindi law or any custom or usage as part of that law in force immediately before the commencement of this act shall cease to have effect with respect to any matter .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF JUNE2014BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI W.P.NOS.23662-23793 OF2014[GM-SLUM]. C/W WP NO.24073/2014 AND WP NOS.25418-25535/2014, WP NOS.24075-24117/2014, 22843-22891/2014, 22184-22191/2014, 25591-25646/2014, 25590/2014 AND25674791/2014 W.P.NOS.23662-23793/2014 BETWEEN1 2.3. 4.5.6. SMT. LAKSHMIDEVI W/O SHRI V MUNIRAJ, AGED ABOUT41YEARS, HOUSE NO.151, SMT. SUBBALAKSHMI W/O SHRI BALU AGED ABOUT44YEARS HOUSE NO.152, SMT. OBALAMMA W/O SHRI VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT33YEARS HOUSE NO.155, SMT. RAMALAKSHMI W/O SHRI OBALESH, AGED ABOUT34YEARS, HOUSE NO.158, SMT. OBALAMMA W/O SHRI ANTHONY AGED ABOUT42YEARS, HOUSE NO.269, SMT. RAJAMMA W/O SHRI RAMACHANDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT50YEARS, 7.8.9. 2 HOUSE NO.344, SHRI NARAYANA V S/O SHRI VENKATRAMANNAPPA, AGED ABOUT31YEARS, HOUSE NO.415, SMT. SUKANYA W/O SHRI KESHAV MURTHY, AGED ABOUT43YEARS, HOUSE NO.480, SMT. THIMMAKKA W/O SHRI NARASHIMAPPA, AGED ABOUT41YEARS, HOUSE NO.22, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1. Petitioners in W.P.Nos.6565-6568/2013, 6651-6652/2013 and Petitioner in W.P.No.6674/2013 are Turf Clubs of Bangalore and Mysore and they have filed these writ petitions challenging the demand raised by the respective Income Tax Officers (TDS) who have issued notices to them as to why they have not deducted income tax while making payment of 'stake money' to the owners of the horses as required under the provisions of Chapter XVII/Section 194B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act' for short) and as to why they should not to be treated as defaulters. The prayers sought for by the petitioners in W.P.Nos.6565-6568/2013 and 6651-6652/2013 are as under: "(1) quash the notices dated 20.01.2012 and 07.01.2013 issued by third respondent for the years 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 (Annexures-B B1, B2, B3) as being unconstitutional and ultra vires the provisions of Income Tax Act, 1961. (2) Quash notices for the years 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R1N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE26h DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2014 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR WRIT PETITION Nos. 6565-6568/2013 And 6651-6652/2013 C/w 18696-18697/2013 & 6674/2013 (T-IT) W.P.Nos.6565-6568/2013 And 6651-6652/2013 BETWEEN: Bangalore Turf Club Limited, A company incorporated under The Companies Act, 1956 Having its registered office at: P.O.Box No.5038, Race Course Road, Bangalore-560 001 Represented by its Secretary (By Sri S.S. Naganand, Sr. Counsel a/w Sri S.Sriranga, advocate) AND: ... Petitioner Union of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Government of India, North Block, New Delhi-110 001 Through the Secretary.1. 2 Central Board of Direct Taxes, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Government of India, North Block, New Delhi-110 001 By its secretary Income Tax Officer (TDS) Ward-16(1), 4th Floor, HMT Bhavan, Bellary Road, Bangalore-560 032.2. 3.4. Mr.S.Padmanabhan 5. Mr.Z.Darashah, 6. Mr.S.Inayathulla, S/o ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Gulbarga
..... ) of the constitution. the first contention is therefore rejected." 32. the communication, dated 26.5.2014 (annexure d) containing the grounds of detention itself states that the detenu speaks kannada, hindi, telegu and english language and that he knows reading and writing in kannada and english. 33. in the kannada version the detenu is unambiguously called upon to submit the representation ..... as we have indicated and he was in constant touch with his daughter and sons and there is no evidence that these people did not know hindi or english. indeed they knew english as well as hindi. it is difficult to accept the position that in the peculiar facts of this case, the grounds were not communicated in the sense the grounds .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
..... the constitution. the first contention is therefore rejected. 22 32. the communication, dated 26.5.2014 (annexure-d) containing the grounds of detention itself states that the detenu speaks kannada, hindi, telegu and english language and that he knows reading and writing in kannada and english.33. in the kannada version the detenu is unambiguously called upon to submit the representation ..... as we have indicated and he was in constant touch with his daughter and sons and there is no evidence that these people did not know hindi or english. indeed they knew english as well as hindi. it is difficult to accept the position that in the peculiar facts of this case, the grounds were not communicated in the sense the grounds .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: This Criminal Referred Case Is Registered As Required Under Section 366 Cr.P.C. For Confirmation Of Death Sentence Awarded To Accused No.10 Syed Mohammed Ibrahim S/O Late Mohammed Ismail By The Xxxiv Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge and Presiding Oficer, Spl. Court, Central Prison Premises, Bangalore By Judgment Of Conviction Dated 21/29-11-2008 In Sc No.696 Of 2005. This Criminal Appeal Is Filed Under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C By The Advocate For The Appellant Praying To Set Aside The Judgment And Order Of Convictions Dated 21.11.2008 And Sentences Dated 29.11.2008 Passed In S.C.No.696/2005, On The File Of 34th Addl. City Civil And Session Judge And P.O Spl.Court For The Trial Of Church Bomb Blast Cases, Central Prison Premises, Bangalore.) 1. A series of bomb blasts at Churches situate at various places rocked the State of Karnataka in the year 2000 attempting to disturb the normal tranquility of the civilized society and the peace loving people of Karnataka who believe in co...
Tag this Judgment!