Court : Delhi
Reported in : 2000IIAD(Delhi)673
..... nair.dr. (mrs.) amrit tewari & dr. (mrs.) manju dutta were appointed as scrutinizers by the council.the chair called for withdrawal, if any.dr. l.k. gandhi withdrew his candidature.as there were now three candidates for the office of vice-president of the council, the election was thereforee conducted by secret ballot.on voting secret ballot ..... not in any way materially affected the result of the election warranting the setting aside of the election at the instance of the fourth respondent dr. l.k. gandhi.25. the respondents had filed replies seeking to sustain the view taken by the inquiry officer in his report. under these circumstances, the questions that arise for ..... in : 75(1998)dlt200 (supra) submitted that the central government had no jurisdiction to deal with the representation made by the fourth respondent dr. l.k. gandhi on 13.11.1995. in other words, the learned senior counsel submitted that the election to the office of president was not amenable to the jurisdiction of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 2000IVAD(Delhi)665; 2000(54)DRJ765
ORDERA.K. Sikri, J.1. Petitioner was commissioned in the Indian Army on 9-6-1968 as Second Lieutenant in Army Service Group. He was romoted from time to time and rose up to the rank of Colonel from which post he retired on 31-5-94. During the period May,1990 to 31-10-1991 petitioner was posted as Commandant 4 Reserve Petroleum Depot,Delhi Centt. He made local purchase of Hygiene Chemical for supply to various units dependent on the aforesaid depot where petitioner was posted. On 31.10.92 petitioner was transferred to ASC Centre North Gaya, Bihar. In May,1993 after the transfer of the petitioner from 4 Reserve Petroleum Depot, Delhi Cantt. two technical inquiries were conducted into the aforesaid purchases made by the petitioner. It is the case of the petitioner that he was not called to give evidence in the said inquiries nor was found blame worthy on any account. However, on 7-5-94 a high level Staff Court of Inquiry was ordered by Western Command of Army to inquire into the alleged i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 2001IIAD(Delhi)20; AIR2001Delhi212; 89(2001)DLT705; 2001(57)DRJ456
..... child to torture and still expect him to act with understanding, peace and tolerance towards others and be a protagonist of peace and love. it was probably for this reason mahatma gandhi said that 'if we are to reach real peace in this world, and if we are to carry on a real war against war, we shall have to begin ..... a person of his life or liberty. rule 37(1)(a)(ii) and (4) requires to be tested on the touch stone of the principle laid down in maneka gandhi's case (supra). these provisions are punitive in nature. the child can be subjected to cruel punishment under the said rule without providing him an opportunity to have a say ..... in article 21 also embraces any aspect of life which makes it dignified. this view finds support from the various decisions in munnan v. illinois 94 us 113; smt. maneka gandhi v. union of india and others : [1978]2scr621 , state of maharashtra v. chander bhan, : (1983)iillj256sc ; kharak singh v. state of u.p. : 1963crilj329 ; c. masilamani mudaliar and others .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 2001IIAD(Delhi)818; 2001CriLJ1064; 89(2001)DLT572; 2001(57)DRJ523; 2001RLR144
..... in the construction of four new plants.11. the mcd shall not use the filled-up slfs for any other purpose except forestry. there are twelve such sites including rajiv gandhi smriti van. we direct the mcd to develop forests and gardens on these 12 sites. the work of a forestation shall be undertaken by the mcd with effect from april .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 91(2001)DLT291
..... the interdependence of fundamental rights, which concept was first accepted in the case commonly known as bank nationalisation case, which thinking was extended to cases attracting article 21 in maneka gandhi v. union of india, the punishment/penalty awarded has to be reasonable; and if it be unreasonable, article 14 would be violated. that article 14 gets attracted in a case .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 2002IIIAD(Delhi)905; 2002(62)DRJ12; [2002]256ITR662(Delhi)
..... was greater loss to them as compared to he amount of interest which they could have earned. as observed by the apex court in rajalakashmi narayan v. margaret kathleen gandhi and ors. : [1993]201itr681(sc) the question of grant of interest has to be decided on the facts and circumstances of a particular case, considering the equities ..... money exchange counters/bureaus since 1959. it may be noted, at this stage, that the bids were invited were for a total of 15 counters at the indira gandhi international and domestic airports. 4. the notice inviting tenders (nit) had set out the area of the counters in sq.meter as also their location and the ..... and respondent no. 3, m/s. american express bank limited (hereinafter referred to as aeb), in respect of money exchange counters to be allotted to them at indira gandhi international airport, new delhi. petitioner also seeks a writ of manda- mus, directing airports authority of india not to forcibly dis-prosses the petitioner from the counters held .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 2002IIIAD(Delhi)465; 2002(63)DRJ792
..... that it had no valid reasons to give and its action was, thereforee, arbitrary. the learned counsel relied on the decisions of this court in sukhdev singh, : (1975)illj399sc : maneka gandhi : [1978]2scr621 : international airport authority : (1979)iillj217sc and ajay hasia : (1981)illj103sc . the learned attorney general, on the other hand, contended that actions of the state or an instrumentality of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 2002CriLJ2401; 97(2002)DLT452; 2002(63)DRJ331
R.S. Sodhi, J. 1. Shri P.V. Narasimha Rao and Shri Buta Singh have filed Criminal Appeal Nos. 638 of 2000 and 621 of 2000 respectively challenging the findings of the Special Judge holding them guilty of the charges framed against them while the Rastriya Mukti Morcha has filed Criminal Revision No. 33 of 2001 challenging the acquittal of Capt. Satish Sharma, Shri V. Rajeshwar Rao, Shri H.M. Revanna, Shri Ramalinga Reddy, Shri M. Veerappa Moilu, Shri D.K. Audikesavulu, Shri M. Thimme Gowda, Shri Bhajan Lal and Shri Ajit Singh, charged and tried along with the appellants. 2. The relevant facts of the case, as noted by the trial court are: "1. That in the general election of 10th Lok Sabha in 1991, Congress (I) emerged as single largest party. It formed the government at the centre under the leadership of accused, P.V. Narasimha Rao (A-1). Monsoon Session of 10^th Lok Sabha was to commence on 26.7.93. A "No Confidence Motion" was moved against the Govt. by Shri Ajay Mukhopadhya, a C.P.I. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 2002(25)PTC262(Del)
A.K.Sikri, J.1. Sex is an inescapable part of us. It is there from the moment of birth when we are given a sexual identity - boy or girl - and it is with us until the day we die - when it goes on the death certificate.2. Ever since Adam and Eve ate forbidden apple and were transported to earth, sex has become basic human instinct. Among other creatures copulation may be only a biological act - for procreation. However, for human beings, sexual intercourse is not only procreative. It is creative as well. It has been described as 'the greatest driving force in the living world'.2. No wonder then, that much is written about it. From time immemorial. On how to enjoy it most. On how to continue to enjoy and be sexually active even at advanced stage of life. Vatsyayana's 'Kamasutra' has placed him among the immortals and no better elegy or eulogy can be written than the following lines:'So long as lips shall kiss and eyes shall see. So long lives This, and This gives life to Thee'.3. Tantra ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 2002VIIIAD(Delhi)12; AIR2002Delhi357; 98(2002)DLT738; 2002(64)DRJ204
..... by the learned single judge) the principles of natural justice would automatically come into play unless they are specifically excluded or excluded by necessary implication. (see for example smt. maneka gandhi v. union of india and another) : [1978]2scr621 , mohinder singh gill and another v. the chief election commissioner, : [1978]2scr272 , swadeshi cotton mills v. union of india, : [1981]2scr533 , liberty .....
Tag this Judgment!