Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mahatma gandhi antarrashtriya hindi vishwavidyalaya act 1996 section 6 jurisdiction Court: mumbai Page 10 of about 200 results (0.149 seconds)

Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. Mr. Avinash D. Kambl ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR1; 2008(2)BomCR497; (2008)110BOMLR805; 2008(4)MhLj125; 1996(72)FLR166

R.C. Chavan, J.1. Being aggrieved by the judgment dated 29-4-2005 rendered by a learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petitions filed by the appellant-employer and partially allowing the petitions by the respondent-employees, the employer has preferred these appeals. 2. The facts, in the context of which these proceedings have arisen and about which there is not much dispute, are as under:3. Appellant M/s. Mahindra & Mahindra manufactures tractors, jeeps, auto components, etc., in its plant including one at Nagpur according to market needs. For this purpose, apart from its regular work force, it also engages a large number of temporary workmen, who are employed and re-employed by issuing orders of appointments from time to time for fixed periods. These employees claimed to have completed 240 days of such employment and, therefore, demanded regularization and permanency. They complained that they were given deliberate breaks and other temporaries were employed in their place to preve...

Dattatraya Gopal Paranjpe Vs. Rashtriya Mill Mazdoor Sangh and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1996(5)BomCR246; (1995)IILLJ913Bom

..... /- per day per room and also to outsiders on payment of rs. 10/- per day per room at higher charges. he also admitted that there is one hall known as mahatma gandhi hall, situated in mazdoor manzil, which was let out on rent for cultural activities and could accommodate 650 persons at a time. that the said trust owned staff quarters in .....

M/s. Maya Developers Vs. Neelam R. Thakkar and Others

Court : Mumbai

..... . defendant noroom noirrevocable consentplaint pg no / comment or statusdefendant no. 10678defendants no. 2, and 30781defendants no. 4 and 51184defendant no. 617not signeddefendants no. 7 to 92087(signed by predecessor, dharmendra gandhi)defendant no. 1024not signeddefendant no. 1127not signeddefendants no. 12 and 133090defendants no. 14 and 1532defendant no. 14 signed the consent (at plaint, p. 93). his brother is in occupation) defendant .....

Wainganga Bahu-uddeshiya Vikas Sanstha and ors. Vs. Anil S/O Dewaji Ga ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... the university were identical. it would be therefore apposite to reproduce one such approval letter in respect of appellant-anil gaikwad. to, the principal, wainganga bahu uddeshiya vikas sanstha, rajive gandhi mahavidyalaya, sadak-arjuni, distt. bhandara. subject : approval of the university for the appointment of lecturers in you college 1996-97 ref'nce: your letter no.rgm/sa/148/96 dated7 .....

Mr. Panchabhai Popotbhai Butani, Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through ...

Court : Mumbai

..... with these circumstances, the petitioners filed the present petition on 31st january 2009 praying that cr no. 1/369 of 2008 under section 420 read with 34 ipc registered at mahatma phule police station be quashed with an interim prayers that the proceedings in furtherance thereto be stayed. the quashing of the fir was prayed on different grounds including the one .....

Dashrath Rajaram Solanke and Others Vs. the Executive Engineer, Chief ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... ) 9 scc 434), nagar mahapalika (now municipal corpn.) v. state of u.p. (2006) 5 scc 127), municipal council, sujanpur v. surinderkumar (2006) 5 scc 173) , regional manager, sbi v. mahatma mishra (2006) 13 scc 727), haryana urban development authority v. om pal (2007) 5 scc 742), uttaranchal forest development corporation v. m.c. joshi (2007) 9 scc 353), madhya pradesh .....

Akhil Mansuklal Mehta Vs. Sheetal Deepak Karamchandani

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... the petitioner was harassed and abused by investigating officer, kasara police station, he filed an application to sessions judge at kalyan and accordingly police station is changed from kasara to mahatma phule police station, vide order dated 16.6.2012. it is further case of the petitioner that on 7.3.2012, the respondent filed second complaint to police station shirdi .....

Shailesh Gandhi Vs. State of Maharashtra,

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3896

..... the addl. commr. of police, anticorruption bureau,bmu, madhu industrial estate, 1st flor, p.b. marg, worli, mumbai 400 013date : 09/10/2006to,shri. shailesh gandhi,b2, gokul aparmant,near asha parekh hospital,poddar road, santacruz (west)mumbai 54.subject : information sought under provisions of r.t.i. act 2005.reference : your application dated ..... filed one affidavit wherein he has annexed a list of some 86 complaints and, according to him, these are the complaints wherein proper investigation is required. mr. gandhi, petitionerinperson, submits that the government should not shirk its responsibility and, in fact, a high ranking officer of the police department i.e. director general, a. ..... 's stand and it has appointed mr. b.k. agrawal, retired ias officer to look into the complaints, which have been agitated in these petitions. mr. gandhi, who has filed writ petition no. 156 of 2006, has cited 86 complaints, out of which the learned advocate general, as directed by this court, has .....

Administrator of U.T. of Dadra and Nagar Haveli and anr. Vs. R.S. Suth ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(3)BomCR724; 2007(1)MhLj579

..... the salary and pay-scale of employees of daman and diu, no such recommendation was made in respect of the employees of dadra and nagar haveli.in the case of mahatma phule f. agricultural university and ors. (supra), the question was regarding pay fixation of daily wagers in the agricultural universities in the state of maharashtra. in the said case, industrial ..... the following cases:1. randhir singh v. union of india and ors. : (1982)illj344sc , 2. purshottam lal and ors. v. union of india and anr. 1973 scc l 337, 3. mahatma phule agricultural university and ors. v. nasik zilla sheth kamgar union and ors. : (2001)iillj809sc , 4. south malabar gramin bank v. co-ordination committee of south employees' union and south .....

Star India Private Limited Vs. Leo Burnett (India) Private Limited

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003(2)BomCR655; 2003(27)PTC81(Bom)

F.I. Rebello, J.1. Plaintiffs carry on business of acquiring copyrights in cinematographic films television serials, programmes etc., and also produce and commission production of television programmes for various television channels. The programmes so acquired or produced or commissioned, according to the plaintiffs, enjoy tremendous popularity amongst television viewers in India as also abroad. The plaintiffs entered into an Agreement dated 9th April, 2000 with Balaji Telefilms Pvt. Ltd., (Balaji) in order to create, compose and produce 262 episodes of a television serial entitled 'KYUN KI SAAS BHI KABHI BAHU THI'.The terms and conditions of that serial are as set out in the Agreement. Reliance is placed on Class 6 of the Agreement, based on which it is contended that the plaintiffs are now the owners of the copyright of the episodes in the serial so far filmed. Since 9th April, 2000, Balaji has produced episodes of the serial 'KYUN KI SAAS BHI KABHI BAHU THI'. Full consideration has...