Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:03. 09.2019 Pronounced on:01. 10.2019 $~ * % + O.M.P. (COMM) 97/2019 OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD. Through: Mr. Amitesh Mishra, Mr. Gunjan Arora, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus JOINT VENTURE OF M/S SAI RAMA ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES (SREE) & M/S MEGHA ENGINEERING & INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED (MEIL) Through: Mr. Purvesh Buttan, Mr. Fahad Imtiaz, Advocates ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.I.A. No.4451/2019 (Delay 27 days in filing) 1. This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 27 days in filing the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) challenging an Award dated 23.10.2018 of the Arbitral Tribunal adjudicating the disputes between the parties.2. When the petition was listed on 13.03.2019, the respondent had raised a preliminary objection that the petition is barred by limitation as provided under Section 34(3) of the Act. He submitted that v...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h July, 2019 Pronounced on:15. October 2019 FAO(OS) (COMM) 14/2018, CM Nos. 3178/2018 & 3180/2018 UNION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through Mr. Ruchir Mishra with Mr. Mukesh versus Kumar Tiwari, Advocates. CORAM: M/S ASSOCIATED CONSTRUCTION CO Through Dr. Amit George, Mr. Rishabh Dheer, Mr. Swaroop George & Mr. Amol Acharya, Advocates. ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.FAO(OS) (COMM) 14/2018, CM Nos. 3178/2018 & 3180/2018 1. This is an appeal under Section 13 of Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as The Commercial Courts Act) read with Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), assailing the order dated 17.08.2016 (hereinafter referred to as the impugned order) passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court, whereby th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on:20. h January, 2015 + O.M.P. No.1036/2012 IFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Saurav Aggarwal, Mr.Trinath, Mr.Mrinal OJha, Mr.Siddhanth Sharma and Mr.Bhuvan Mishra, Advs. versus INDO-RAMA SYNTHETICS LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr.Prag P. Tripathi, Sr. Adv. Mr.Joy Basu, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Aayush Agarwal, Mr.Abhimanyu Bhandari, Ms.Aanchal Mullick & Ms.Monisha Handa, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking setting aside of the Arbitral Award dated 1st August, 2012 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal of quorum comprising three arbitrators.2. Brief facts of the present case are that the petitioner is a Company duly incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and having its regi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... mauka aya hai raj kayam karan da 27.4 these were utterances made by the appellants, in public, immediately upon the assassination of india s former prime minister, mrs. indira gandhi. the appellants were, inter alia, charged under section 124 a of the ipc. 27.5 in the context of the aforesaid, the supreme court made the following observations vis- -vis .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1205/2012 Date of Decision:8. h October, 2013 ISHTIYAK Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Joginder Tuli and Mr. A.K. Sharma, Advocates. versus STATE(NCT OF DELHI) Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Dayan Krishnan, ASC for the State with ASI Om Prakash, PS Hauz Khas. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India r/w Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks issuance of writ of certiorari for quashing the impugned order of learned Additional Sessions Judge dated 10th July, 2012, vide which the charge under Section 3 of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred as MCOCA) was framed against the petitioner in FIR No.269/2011, PS Hauz Khas.2. The brief facts as they emerge from the record are that the petitioner Mohd. Ishtiyaq was apprehended during vehicle checking in the area of PS Hauz Khas, New Delhi in a car baring No.DL6 Q339...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on:08. 07.2013 % + Order delivered on:07. 11.2013 CS(OS) 290/2010 KHAWAR BUTT ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Manish Kaushik, Advocate with Mr. Vivek Singh, Advocate versus ASIF NAZIR MIR & ORS ..... Defendant Through: Ms. Manmeet Arora, Ms. Mansi Sharma and Ms. Nidhi Parashar, Advocates CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI ORDER VIPIN SANGHI, J.I.A. No.13629/2011 (U/O7rule 11(a) read with Section 151 CPC by the defendant) I.A. No.13630/2011 (U/O6Rule 16 read with Section 151 CPC by the defendant) I.A. No.14479/2011(U/O7Rule 11 and Section 151 CPC by the defendant) I.A. No.8404/2013(U/O6Rule 17 CPC read with Section 151 CPC for amendment of plaint by the plaintiff) 1. By this common order, I proceed to dispose of the aforesaid four applications.2. The plaintiff has preferred the present suit to claim damages of Rs. 1 crore and for mandatory injunction. Initially, there were two defendants in the suit defendant No.1 being Asif Naz...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Reserved on:15. th February, 2017 Pronounced on:28th March, 2017 CS (COMM) 132/2016 - IA No.2406/2016 (O.39 R. 1 & 2 CPC), IA No.9070/2016 (O.39 R. 2A CPC), IA No.4277/2016 (O. 39 R. 4 CPC) MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC AND ORS. ..... PLAINTIFFS Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Ms. Prathiba M. Singh, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Chander M. Lall, Ms. Bitika Sharma, Ms. Namrita Kochhar, Ms. Deepshikha Malhotra, Mr. Aadarsh Ramanujan and Mr. Anil Dutt, Advocates. Versus NUZIVEEDU SEEDS LIMITED & ORS. ...DEFENDANTS Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra Agarwala and Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Abhai Pandey, Ms. Manisha Singh, Ms. Swati Setia, Mr. Obhan, Mr. Abhishek Saket & Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocates for D-1 to D-3. Mr. Abhishek Saket and Ms. Vijaya Singh, Advocates for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER1 The commercial cause, registered as CS(Comm) No.132/2016, in the course of which prayer for ad interim injunction CS (Comm) 132/2016 Page 1 of 96 un...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... abc vs. state (nct of delhi), air2015sc2569 wherein the court had noted that avowedly, the mother is best suited to care for her offspring , so aptly and comprehensively conveyed in hindi by the word mamta . . she further submits that courts need to assess and respect that a mother is the primary caregiver, and even though the mother may not be financially ..... , worshipping idols of hindu gods and goddesses. she was also not allowed to go to the temple or celebrate karva chauth. their child, m was not allowed to speak in hindi at home. she could speak only in english or punjabi. thus m, inspite of living in a community of ethnically and linguistically diverse people, was being raised in and exposed .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... bank & anr. 163 (2009) dlt543(hereinafter, alfa therm ); d) nhai v. elsamex tws-snc joint venture 150 (2008) dlt215 e) stc v. jainsons clothing corporation (1994) 6 scc597 f) mahatama gandhi sahakre sakkare karkhane v. national heavy engg. coop ltd. (2007) 6 scc470 g) up coop. federation ltd. v. singh consultants and engg. (1988) 1 scc174 h) up state sugar corporation .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... vs. flowmore private limited, 1995(4) scc515 hindustan steel works construction ltd. vs. tarapore & company, 1996(5) scc34 u.p. state sugar corporation vs. sumac international ltd. 1997(1) scc568 mahatma gandhi sahakari sakhar karkhana vs. national heavy engineering coop. ltd. and anr. (2007) 6 scc470and dwarikesh sugar industries ltd. vs. prem heavy engineering works pvt. ltd. (1997) 6 scc450 11. it .....
Tag this Judgment!