Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtriya Hindi Vishwavidyalaya Act 1996 Section 44 Statues Ordinances And Regulations To Be Published In The Official Gazette And To Be Laid Before Parliament - Judgment Search Results

Babubhai Jashbhai Patel and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR1988Guj1; (1987)2GLR710

newspaper photographs (annexure-A and B) are showing the picture of Mahatma Gandhi as a down cast depressed, dull, lifeless and pulled bronze statue of Mahatma Gandhiji at a suitable place at Gandhinagar be put up 'and. therefore, a Committee of five officers to the Government to form or accept an opinion ~and act on it and it is not for the Court to officers was constituted to decide the artist, location of the statue, its pose and approximate cost etc. and the Committee had has seen the newspaper representation of photographs of this statue published in Gujarat Samachar and Gandhinagar Samachar dated 24-9-1986 (annexure-A and directing the Municipal Commissioner to compare the statue with the official photographs available with the Corporation and if he certified that

Rajeev Kumar Suman S/O Kedarnath Prasad Vs. Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtr ...

Court: Mumbai Nagpur

the parties. 2. The petitioner was rusticated therefore, this petition. Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtriya Hindi Vishwavidyalaya Act, 1996 (for short the said parties. 2. The petitioner was rusticated therefore, this petition. Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtriya Hindi Vishwavidyalaya Act, 1996 (for short the said Act) 2. The petitioner was rusticated therefore, this petition. Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtriya Hindi Vishwavidyalaya Act, 1996 (for short the said Act) provides The petitioner was rusticated therefore, this petition. Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtriya Hindi Vishwavidyalaya Act, 1996 (for short the said Act) provides for petitioner was rusticated therefore, this petition. Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtriya Hindi Vishwavidyalaya Act, 1996 (for short the said Act) provides for dispute was rusticated therefore, this petition. Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtriya Hindi Vishwavidyalaya Act, 1996 (for short the said Act) provides for dispute settlement rusticated therefore, this petition. Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtriya Hindi Vishwavidyalaya Act, 1996 (for short the said Act) provides for dispute settlement mechanism the provisions of sub-sections (2), (3), (4) and (5) of section 32 shall, as far as may be, apply to a appeal within such time as may be prescribed by the Statutes, to the Executive Council against the decision of any officer meaning of the Arbitration Act, 1940. (5) The procedure for regulating the work of the Tribunal shall be prescribed by the

Dayalbagh Educational Institute vs.university Grants Commission & Ors

Court: Delhi

(STATE UNIVERSITY MAHARAS HTRA MAHARAS HTRA MAHARAS HTRA MADHYA PRADESH MAHATMA GANDHI ANTARRASHTRIYA HINDI VISHWAVIDYAIAYA (CENTRAL . UNIVERSITY) SHIVAJI UNIVERSITY (STATE UNIVERSITY MAHARAS HTRA MAHARAS HTRA MAHARAS HTRA MADHYA PRADESH MAHATMA GANDHI ANTARRASHTRIYA HINDI VISHWAVIDYAIAYA (CENTRAL . UNIVERSITY) SHIVAJI UNIVERSITY (STATE UNIVERSITY) MAHARAS HTRA MAHARAS HTRA MAHARAS HTRA MADHYA PRADESH MAHATMA GANDHI ANTARRASHTRIYA HINDI VISHWAVIDYAIAYA (CENTRAL . UNIVERSITY) SHIVAJI UNIVERSITY (STATE UNIVERSITY) YASHWANTRAO HTRA MAHARAS HTRA MAHARAS HTRA MADHYA PRADESH MAHATMA GANDHI ANTARRASHTRIYA HINDI VISHWAVIDYAIAYA (CENTRAL . UNIVERSITY) SHIVAJI UNIVERSITY (STATE UNIVERSITY) YASHWANTRAO CHAVAN YASHWANTRAO CHAVAN MAHARASHTRA OPEN UNIVERSITY (STATE OPEN UNIVERSITY) DEVI AHILYA VISHWAVIDYALAYA (STATE UNIVERSITY) ORISSA NORTH ORISSA UNIVERSITY (STATE UNIVERSITY RAJASTH AN Deemed to be University under section 3 of the said Act, for all degree programmes of learning at the undergraduate and a (j) Higher Educational university covered under clause (f) of section 2 and an institution deemed to be a university covered not provided. Variation in Faculty details given in Part-A. 44. The petitioner was also vide the said letter requested to on behalf of the petitioner that on 17.10.2018 the... Petitioners status on the web portal UGC was shown at entry No.74, in Open and Distance Learning before the commencement of these regulations, fails to obtain recognition under these regulations for offering programmes Regulations, 2017.20. The petitioner submits that on 09.08.2018, the UGC published the public notice to the effect that the approval of violations, a First lodged against Information Report may be the officials or management of the errant Higher Educational Institution to take they were finalized, the same would be notified in the Gazette of India for information of all stakeholders and after giving mode cannot be granted without following the norms and procedure laid down by theAICTE and the reliance was placed by the 20.2.2019 submitted that it was constituted under an Act of Parliament (52 of 1987) with a view to the proper planning

Sebastian K. Antony Kavumbhagom Vs. Manager, St.Albert's College, Erna ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2012(2)KLT133(SN)(C.No.129)

Act 1985 read with Part D, Chapter 45 of the Mahatma Gandhi University Statues, 1997, should not be taken against you. 1985 read with Part D, Chapter 45 of the Mahatma Gandhi University Statues, 1997, should not be taken against you. You necessary to enable the Enquiry Officer to hold whether the act complained of constitutes misconduct within the meaning of the Standing furnished to the delinquent. (Transport Commissioner vs. Radha K Murthy. 1996(74) FLR 139(SC) followed in Havildar Singh vs. Tigra Metal and of Sec. 63 of the University Act. The said sub sections read as follows:- "(9) Any person who objects to an Register for writing the salary bills. At Page 5 (page 44 of Paper Book) the Principal has deposed as follows:- "Once with Part D, Chapter 45 of the Mahatma Gandhi University Statues, 1997, should not be taken against you. You are allowed alleged. The correct provision of the Standing Orders, Service Rules, Regulations etc. attracting the misconduct shall be quoted in the charge of the principles of natural justice. (N.R.Rajan vs.Mathrubhoomi Printing and Publishing Co. 2001 Lab IC 1508(Ker). Representation can be permitted in statements submitted by the Principal to the D.D.Office is an official and authentic document which will conclusively show the presence and The procedure to be followed in awarding other punishments is laid down in the service rules governing the employee. What is

Karan Singh Vs. Jamuna Singh

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1959All427

same cannot be said with regard to a portrait of Mahatma Gandhi. People may keep his portrait because they revere him it represents Mahatma Gandhi himself. Some thing, which represented Mahatma Gandhi himself, could not be contended to be a national symbol meaning of that expression used in Section 123(3) of the Act. The portrait of Mahatma Gandhi not being a national symbol, could be a ground for setting aside an election under Section 100(1)(d)(iv) of the Act, provided there was allegation and proof 55,000 slips? 10 (d) Whether the accounts were not kept regularly from day to day and whether the accounts violated the to be national emblem of India. The emblem or the official seal of the United Nations organisation can never be held on the incurring or authorising of expenditure. All that is laid down by Sub-section (1) is that expenses which have been national symbol. They are (1) by law passed by the Parliament, (2) a declaration by the Government of India either, under

Anant Janardhan Karandikar Vs. State

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1967Bom11; (1966)68BOMLR256; ILR1966Bom663

has narrated the events which took place in September 1944. Mahatma Gandhi was about to go to Bombay to meet Barrister country by putting an end to the life of Mahatma Gandhi 'the Father of the nation'. This group of individuals had Karkare and made speeches expressing appreciation and admiration for Nathuram's act of assassinating Mahatma Gandhi. He has nowhere said that he and the defence of India and civil defence'. Whether this section is constructed as mandatory or directory, the fact remains that in consonance with the spirit of the provision of S. 44 of the Defence of India Act. This again illustrates the these cases is that if on the language of the statute the authority is to be satisfied on certain material, then acting in pursuance of this Act shall interfere with the ordinary avocations of life and the enjoyment of property as little inhabitants had been generally responsible. By regulation 5(1) of these regulations, no order for a collective fine could be made unless petitioner has written articles in a magazine known as 'Painjan' published from Poona from January 1963 to April 1965. He used in the A. I. C. C. on 22-2-1948. the writer laid particular emphasis on the last sentence of that passage, namely,

Vimalavva Alias Vinodavva Vs. Smt. Yellavva and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR2003Kant313; 2003(3)KarLJ424

123 of the Act. The use of the photo of Mahatma Gandhi in processions conducted for election propaganda, has been spoken to by P.Ws. 4 and 52; the use of Mahatma Gandhi's bust on the stage of the drama 'Dattuputra', in such corrupt practices under Sub-section (3) of Section 123 of the Act, have not been established'.7. There is one more Act, known before concluding that the corrupt practice under Sub-section (3) of Section 123 of the Act had been committed, the Tribunal had pertaining to the alleged use of Mahatma Gandhi's photo or statuette or bust, will be relevant for the purpose of Sub-section has to declare what is national symbol. In the book published as 'India 1985' none of the pictures of the national P. 32 is an appeal by the appellant and the Parliamentary Congress candidate Agadi Sanganna to the electors of Yelburga. It

Gajanan Vishwanath Ketkar Vs. the State

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1967Bom96; (1966)68BOMLR321; 1967CriLJ427; ILR1966Bom839

of the indiscriminate praise of Nathuram Godse, the assassin of Mahatma Gandhi, the District Magistrate apprehends that breach of the peace Chief Minister and the Home Minister had great faith in Gandhiji's power to pacify his extremist opponents, and they though nothing Desai & Bal, JJ., had, in effect stated as follows:'The acts of the petitioner on the 12th and 15th November gave 12th and 15th November 1964, evoked considerable wrath among all sections of the people and the press in the State. Several which the Supreme Court held;-'Where power is vested in a statutory authority to deprive the liberty of a subject on its is a place of strategic importance. There is a big ordinance factory situated near Poona and a large military force has would it be proper to fall back upon the principle laid down in (1882) 9 QND 308 or Diecy's exposition of newspaper reports and the debate in the Assembly and the Parliament, a storm of controversy was raised as a result of

Tushar Arun Gandhi Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996IXAD(SC)408; JT1996(10)SC525; 1996(8)SCALE449; (1997)1SCC1; [1996]Supp9SCR173; 1997(1)LC170(SC)

existence of a box stated to contain the 'Asthis' of Mahatma Gandhi kept in safe deposit in the year 1950 by wooden box said to be containing the ashes of Mahatma Gandhi purported to have been made by the Secretary to the enable him to complete the last rites as per the Hindu religious practice. He did not receive any response to his the CBI. In fact by the letter dated 23rd March, 1996 the Commissioner-cum-Secretary to the State Government wrote to the General the entry is an old one of 1950 made in regular course of business of the Bank we fail to see withdrew the petitioner broke his fast and approached the Bank officials in Bhubaneswar to cooperate and put an end to the

Associated Publishers (Madras) Ltd. Vs. K. Bashyam alias 'Arya' and An ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1961Mad114

framed:(1) Has the plaintiff any copyright in the portrait of Mahatma Gandhi as prepared by him? (2) Is the suit bad and author of a copyright in a portrait of Mahatma Gandhi in a sitting posture. Paragraph 13 contains the following plea:'This of the copyright shall, except as otherwise provided by this Act, be entitled to all such remedies by way of injunction company were to be allowed to raise a plea under Section 8 of the Copyright Act, on the strength of this printing and sale of the painting prepared by Acharya and published by Joseph, the second defendant; 3. the first defendant Was Though the case related to a literary publication, the principles laid down by their Lordships of the Judicial Committee would govern