Court : Supreme Court of India
..... process was distinctly avoided by the framers of the constitution and replaced by the colourless expression procedure established by law . despite this, owing to changed circumstances, maneka gandhi (supra) in 1978, followed by a number of judgments, have read what was expressly rejected by the framers into article 21, so that by the time ..... otherwise, the shift in our understanding of the nature and location of various fundamental rights in part iii brought about by r.c. cooper and maneka gandhi has removed the foundations of m.p. sharma and kharak singh.10. petitioners submitted that decisions numbering atleast 30 beginning with mathews, j. s full- ..... his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law. if this article is expanded in accordance with the interpretative principle indicated in maneka gandhi, it will read as follows: no person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to fair, just and reasonable procedure established by .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... with appropriate definiteness is regarded as a fundamental concept in criminal law and must now be regarded as a pervading theme of our constitution since the decision in maneka gandhi. the underlying principle is that every person is entitled to be informed as to what the state commands or forbids and that the life and liberty of a ..... orientation, without discrimination. 16.1. right to live with dignity this court has expansively interpreted the terms life and personal liberty to recognise a panoply of rights 31 maneka gandhi v. union of india & anr., (1978) 1 scc248 at paragraph 48 26 under article 21 of the constitution, so as to comprehend the true scope and contours ..... say that section 377 must not be arbitrary.177. whether section 377 stands the trinity test of articles 14, 19 and 21 as propounded in the case of maneka gandhi (supra) will be ascertained and determined at a later stage of this judgment when we get into the interpretative dissection of section 377 ipc. m. doctrine of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... , competition to be judged by jury (with citizen participation), encouragement of widest participation. various domestic examples were also cited including of national war memorial and indira gandhi national center for arts - to demonstrate how an open design competition is the standard norm. 7195. the petitioners contend that consultation services nit was issued in ..... the manner as provided was observed, it would be sufficient. the contention that the publication as per the mandate of the statute needs to be in hindi though the paper itself was published in urdu was not a good ground to strike down the delegated legislation.21. in lachmi narain v. union of ..... campus jantar-mantar road 28. bahawaipur house and campus sikandararoad 29. faridkot house and campus copernicus marg 30. national stadium and campus lbz central vista 31. indira gandhi memorial safdaijung road 32. darblianga house 'and campus 7, man singh road 33. kapurthala house and campus 3, man singh road 34. j&k house and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
[pic].REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL/CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.167 OF2012SHREYA SINGHAL ... PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA ... RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.21 OF2013WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.23 OF2013WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.97 OF2013WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.199 OF2013WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.217 OF2013WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.222 OF2013WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.225 OF2013WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.758 OF2014WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.196 OF2014JUDGMENT R.F. NARIMAN, J.1. This batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India raises very important and far-reaching questions relatable primarily to the fundamental right of free speech and expression guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. The immediate cause for concern in these petitions is Section 66A of the Information Technology Act of 2000. This Section was not in the Act as originally enacted, but came into force by v...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... and other regulations providing for earning of such remission and remission of the sentence itself by imposing conditions. keeping the above factual matrix in the rajiv gandhi murder case, vis- -vis the 7 respondents therein as a sample situation, we proceed to analyze these questions arising under section 435 code of ..... of criminal procedure. after referring to the said section, learned solicitor general referred to the convictions imposed on the accused/respondents in the late rajiv gandhi murder case. learned solicitor general pointed out that though 26 accused were convicted by the special court, this court confirmed the conviction only as against ..... central act, state government gets jurisdiction which will be the appropriate government. in this context, our attention was drawn to the fact that in the rajiv gandhi murder case, respondents santhan, murugan, nalini and arivu @ perarivalan were awarded death sentence, while 3 other accused, namely, ravichandran, robert payas and jayakumar .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... 14/05/2009 /tune: 11:00:43 e-mail cleared balance: 0.00 cr. uncleared amount: 0.00statement of account central bank of india baraba_barabazar (kolkata) 178, mahatma gandhi road, barabazar branch code: 00102 devi ispat ltd. 85, netaji subhas road, ist floor, 2nd floor, kolkata - 700 001 account no. : 1103589988 product: medium ..... 2009 /tune: 10:58:05 e-mail cleared balance: 49,82,783.42 cr. uncleared amount: 0.00statement of account central bank of india baraba_barabazar (kolkata) 178, mahatma gandhi road, barabazar branch code: 00102 devi ispat ltd. 85, netaji subhas road, ist floor, 2nd floor, kolkata - 700 001 account no. : 3001640109 product: medium ..... settling their dues the "uncleared amount" has been mentioned as 0.00 (nil) which read as under:"statement of account central bank of india baraba_barabazar (kolkata) 178, mahatma gandhi road, barabazar branch code: 00102 devi ispat ltd. 85, netaji subhas road, ist floor, 2nd floor, kolkata - 700 001 account no. : 1103589988 product: medium .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... pp in the best bakery case), shri dilip trivedi (as special pp in the sardarpura case), shri rajendra darji (as special pp in the dipda darwaja case), shri piyush gandhi (pp in panchmahal district), have been questioned. (xvi) officers at grass-root level were not transferred as per state intelligence bureau s recommendation till the arrival of shri ..... the call records of mr. sanjiv bhatt for the relevant period and noted thus116: - ..shri r. b. sreekumar formerly adgp intelligence, in his interview to the star hindi news 115 pages 249-254 of original copy of the final report forming part of convenience compilation of respondent no.2 116 pages 254-255 of original copy of the ..... meeting and also about its agenda or the matters discussed in the said meeting. shri r. b. sreekumar formerly adgp intelligence, in his interview given to the star hindi news channel at 12.35 hrs on 22.04.2011 has stated that shri sanjiv bhatt, dci (security) had never informed him about having attended a meeting at cm .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.4634 OF2014VIJAY MADANLAL CHOUDHARY & ORS. ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.28394 OF2011SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.28922 OF2011SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.29273 OF2011SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.............OF2022(@ DIARY No.41063 OF2015 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.9987 OF2015SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.10018 OF2015SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.10019 OF20152 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.993 OF2016TRANSFER PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.150 OF2016TRANSFER PETITION (CRIMINAL) NOS.151-157 OF2016WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.152 OF2016SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.11839 OF2019SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.2890 OF2017SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.5487 OF2017CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1269 OF2017CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1270 OF2017CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1271-1272 O...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... |m/s. ramraj agro | | | | |m/s.ramraj agro at | |mills. ex- p-1519, | | | | |vendampalai at the rate | |pg. 263-276 of vol.| | | | |of rs.3/- per share from| |61 ca2196dd | | | | |gandhi and others | |challan dt. | | | | |(6,18,000 shares minus | |20.12.1994 | | | | |4000 shares) pw501| | | | | | |one sixth undivided |21-3-199|tmt. n. sasikala |10,87,196|ii |155 | |shares .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... concentrated solely upon the existence of enacted law. after three decades, the supreme court overruled its previous decision in a.k. gopalan and held in its landmark judgment in maneka gandhi v. union of india that the procedure contemplated by article 21 must answer the test of reasonableness. the court further held that the procedure should also be in conformity with .....
Tag this Judgment!