Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mahatma gandhi antarrashtriya hindi vishwavidyalaya act 1996 section 2 definitions Court: delhi Page 20 of about 193 results (0.112 seconds)

Feb 19 2018 (HC)

Vikas vs.state

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: November 25th, 2017 Judgment pronounced on: February 19th, 2018 + CRL.A. 1151/2016 VIKAS STATE + CRL.A. 104/2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M. L. Yadav, Adv. versus Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP ..... Respondent NEERAJ@KARAN STATE ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, (DHCLSC) versus Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP ..... Respondent + CRL.A. 82/2017 SONU@MATKA STATE ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, (DHCLSC) versus Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. P. GARG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT Crl.A. Nos. 1151/2016, 104/2017 & 82/2017 Page 1 of 79 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. The appellants, before us, were convicted, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karkardooma (hereinafter referred to as the learned ASJ), vide judgment dated 16th July 2016, for offences punishable under Sections 302/34, 3and 396 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as I...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2018 (HC)

Neeraj@karan vs.state

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: November 25th, 2017 Judgment pronounced on: February 19th, 2018 + CRL.A. 1151/2016 VIKAS STATE + CRL.A. 104/2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M. L. Yadav, Adv. versus Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP ..... Respondent NEERAJ@KARAN STATE ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, (DHCLSC) versus Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP ..... Respondent + CRL.A. 82/2017 SONU@MATKA STATE ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, (DHCLSC) versus Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. P. GARG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT Crl.A. Nos. 1151/2016, 104/2017 & 82/2017 Page 1 of 79 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. The appellants, before us, were convicted, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karkardooma (hereinafter referred to as the learned ASJ), vide judgment dated 16th July 2016, for offences punishable under Sections 302/34, 3and 396 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as I...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2018 (HC)

Sonu@matka vs.state

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: November 25th, 2017 Judgment pronounced on: February 19th, 2018 + CRL.A. 1151/2016 VIKAS STATE + CRL.A. 104/2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M. L. Yadav, Adv. versus Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP ..... Respondent NEERAJ@KARAN STATE ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, (DHCLSC) versus Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP ..... Respondent + CRL.A. 82/2017 SONU@MATKA STATE ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, (DHCLSC) versus Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. P. GARG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT Crl.A. Nos. 1151/2016, 104/2017 & 82/2017 Page 1 of 79 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. The appellants, before us, were convicted, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karkardooma (hereinafter referred to as the learned ASJ), vide judgment dated 16th July 2016, for offences punishable under Sections 302/34, 3and 396 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as I...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //