Maharashtra Irrigation Act 1976 - Judgment Search Results

Bhimrao Sambhaji Linge and Others Vs. Hanumant Anandrao Pawalkar and A ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1998(2)ALLMR193; 1998(3)BomCR298; 1997(3)MhLj769

Decree of the Civil Court', in section 42 of the Maharashtra Irrigation Act, 1976 would mean that the Legislature while enacting based on the construction of section 42 of the Maharashtra Irrigation Act, 1976. Sub-section (1) of section 42 sets out that is pointed out that section 104 of the Maharashtra Irrigation Act clearly sets out that no suit shall lie in any in so far as section 42 of the Act of 1976 is concerned.9. The next question is whether there is implied

Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation Vs. Additional Commissione ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (2006)200CTR(Bom)555; [2005]278ITR521(Bom)

it clear that the corporation notwithstanding anything contained in the Maharashtra Irrigation Act, 1976, and the Bombay Canal Rules, 1934, may including flood control. It is further submitted that the Vidharbha Irrigation Development Corporation Act, 1997 (hereinafter referred to as 'the VIDC counsel we find that under Section 50 of the VIDC Act, the rehabilitation is to be carried out only by the January 2001 in the VIDC Act, the Maharashtra Irrigation Act, 1976, and the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act and the

Vidarbha Irrigation Development Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2006)102ITD1(Mum.)

of water users' association and other organizations formed under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 for the better use of facilities have already noted hereinabove, mobilization of resources and completion of irrigation projects in time-bound manner and also generation of hydro-electric energy Counsel for the assessee took us through the Maharashtra Irrigation Act, 1976, i.e., Maharashtra Act No. XXXVIII of 1976. "Canal Officer" Canal Officer, notwithstanding anything contained in the Maharashtra Irrigation Act, 1976 and the provisions of Bombay Canal Rules, 1934, within the

Rattan India Power Limited Vs. The State of Maharashtra through the Ch ...

Court: Mumbai Nagpur

25.01.2011, points out rate of IRC to NTPC, Adani Power Maharashtra, Adani GR Power and Reliance Energy Limited. It then complains Crores towards irrigation restoration charges on account of loss of irrigation. Material on record shows that (on 06.03.2009) with reference to an obligation on the part of public authorities in their acts of omission and commission to be reasonable. In Biman Krishna Section 58(6) of the Maharashtra Irrigation Act, 1976, (XXXVIII of 1976) and submits that water is made available to the petitioner

Vidarbha Irrigation Development Vs. Additional Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Nagpur

Reported in: (2005)93ITD184(Nag.)

State Government who does rehabilitation and resettlement in accordance with Maharashtra Projects Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1986. His further submission was time bound manner and to promote and operate the said irrigation projects. According to the Standing Counsel for the revenue, the had claimed exemptions under the various provisions of Income Tax Act. The Appellant be granted legitimate claim of depreciation on its exercisable by the State Government under the Maharashtra Irrigation Act, 1976 & Bombay Canal Rules, 1934. Under Section 26 the Assessee

income-tax Officer Vs. Panchganga Sahakari Pani

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Reported in: (1986)16ITD183(Pune.)

not the price for water. He referred specifically to the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, and various provisions thereof to bring of the water for irrigation. This was under the Bombay Irrigation Act, 1879, which was replaced by the Maharashtra Irrigation Act, The land revenue under Section 2(19) of the Maharashtra Irrigation Act includes any cess or rate authorised by the State Government Act, 1879, which was replaced by the Maharashtra Irrigation Act, 1976. This Act imposes a liability for payment of water rates

Sarang Yadwadkar and Others Vs. the Commissioner, Pune Municipal Corpo ...

Court: National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

road including the blue line on the strength of the Maharashtra Public Works Manual (Appendix 42). Vesting of financial and administrative office has requested to issue "No Objection Certificate" from the Irrigation Department, for proposed road along the river Mutha from Vittalwadi burden of proof on the person or entity proposing the activity that is potentially harmful to the environment. (See Report of is also the Canal Officer under the Maharashtra Irrigation Act, 1976. 24. From the bare reading of the above circular dated

Executive Engineer, Irrigation Department Vs. Shrikrushna Deorao Wakod ...

Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Nagpur

The perusal of the Sections 27 and 31 of the Maharashtra Irrigation Act 1976 shows that the owner of the agricultural perusal of the Sections 27 and 31 of the Maharashtra Irrigation Act 1976 shows that the owner of the agricultural land of the Sections 27 and 31 of the Maharashtra Irrigation Act 1976 shows that the owner of the agricultural land to provisions Sections 27 and 31 of the Maharashtra Irrigation Act, 1976 in support of his submission that it was sole responsibility

Executive Engineer, Yavatmal Medium Project Division and anr. Vs. Anan ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1998(4)ALLMR201; (1998)IILLJ77Bom; 1998(3)MhLj897

Department or work connected with that of the State of Maharashtra, on the same tests as applied by the Apex Court separate Standing Orders have been certified in respect of the Irrigation Projects neither have any Rules been framed or for that Act. and the provisions of Chapter V-A of the I.D. Act will apply in their case, if their termination is by that the State of Maharashtra has enacted Maharashtra Irrigation Act, 1976 with an object to provide charging water rates on lands

Union of India Vs. Tarsem Singh

Court: Supreme Court of India

vs State of Assam (1989) 3 SCC709at 735. Also, in Maharashtra State Electricity Board vs Thana Electric Supply Co. (1989) 3 SCR39, depending on whether you acquire for housing or hospital, irrigation scheme or town improvement, school building or police station?. The have been given away . 45. Then again, under the Act, the acquisition even though it is for a public purpose question would be whether the provisions of the Amending Act, 1976, had a reasonable and direct nexus with the objects of