Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: madras area Sorted by: recent Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 16,934 results (0.115 seconds)

Sep 25 1998 (HC)

Harnek Singh Vs. the State of Punjab [Overruled]

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1999CriLJ635

..... provides that any officer in charge of a police station may, without the order of a magistrate, investigate any cognizable case which a court having jurisdiction over the local area within the limits of such station would have power to inquire into or try under the provisions of chapter xiii and that sub-section (2) further provides that no proceeding of a police officer in any such case shall at ..... weights and measures act, 1976 came to be considered by a learned single judge of this court who found that the complaint could be filed by director metrology in writing to the judicial magistrate ist class having jurisdiction in the area at moga and district food and supplies controller, could move the director metrology and not the police in this regard. ..... 17 of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 that under clause (a) an inspector of delhi police in the case of the delhi special police establishment; under clause (b) in the metropolitan areas of bombay, calcutta, madras and ahmedabad and in any other metropolitan area notified as such under sub-sec. (1) of s. ..... persons authorised to investigate - notwithstanding anything contained in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), no police officer below the rank - (a) in the case of the delhi special police establishment, of an inspector of police; (b) in the metropolitan area of bombay, calcutta, madras and ahmedabad and in any other metropolitan area notified as such under sub-sec. (1) of s. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 1993 (HC)

Bharat Electronics Ltd. Vs. the State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1994)106PLR262

..... bharat electronics limited is a government company having its registered office at bangalore and regional offices at calcutta, madras and hyderabad. ..... its factory unit is situated in the industrial area, panchkula, haryana. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 1989 (HC)

Mohan Lal and Etc. Vs. the State and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1989CriLJ1976

..... 7569-m of 1988, who, were working as marketing and regional managers, respectively, of m/s tropical agro-systems private limited, madras, and, sh. ..... hanuman sharma, marketing manager of m/s agro chemicals, vishwakarma industrial area, jaipur, respondent no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 1970 (HC)

The State of Punjab Vs. Union of India

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1971]80ITR248(P& H)

..... thus a state government can tax agricultural land and may adopt as the basis for calculating or determining the amount of tax :(a) the area of the land, (b) the market value of the land, (c) the annual rental value of the land , or (d) the capital value of the land. ..... ' what the entries in the lists purport to do is to confer legislative powers on the respective legislatures in respect of areas or fields covered by the said entries; and it is an elementary rule of construction that wildest possible construction must be put upon their words. ......'17. ..... : [1970]75itr603(sc) , under madras urban land tax act the state legislature of madras imposed a tax on non-agricultural land in urban areas at a percentage of the market value. ..... as regards entry 49 of list ii, it empowers the state legislatures to tax directly lands and buildings, and for determining the basis of the tax the state legislature may either the area, annual rental value, market value, or the capital value. ..... it is not possible to give to the words 'to the exclusion of any other court' a limited meaning whereby only the original jurisdiction of the three presidency courts, namely madras, bombay, and calcutta was intended to be excluded. ..... this was negatived both by the madras high court and by the supreme court. ..... of urban land tax , madras v. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 24 1965 (HC)

Pritam Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1967P& H198; 1967CriLJ254

..... prepared in respect of him under section 32-d :provided that nothing herein shall affect--(a) the lauds of such landowner or tenant which have been exempted under section 32-k; or(b) the right of such person to any compensation in respect of such surplus area to which he may be entitled under this act: provided further that no such order shall be made without giving the person concerned an opportunity of being heard.it may be mentioned that sections 32-bb and 32-ff were inserted by the ..... the market value of such building, structure, tube-well or crop, as the case may be, and which shall be determined,--(a) in the case of crop, by the collector; and(b) in oilier cases, by the pepsu land commission or, in respect of the surplus area declared under sub-section (12) of section 32-k by the board referred to in sub-section (6) of that section :provided that an option in writing may be given by the collector to the owner to remove such building, structure, tube-well or crop ..... have the same meaning as that expression or its local equivalent has in the existing law relating to land tenures in force in that area and shall also include--(i) any jagir, inam or muafi or other similar grant and in the states of madras and kerala, any janmam right;(ii) any land held under ryotwari settlement;(iii) any land held or let for purposes of agriculture or for purposes ancillary thereto, including waste land, forest land, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 1954 (HC)

Sathir Singh and ors. Vs. Rajbir Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1954P& H274

..... .there is, however, no clause in the letters patent of the lahore high court expressly conferring any powers of the ordinary original civil jurisdiction such as occurs in the letters patent of the high court of calcutta, bombay and madras in which ordinary original civil jurisdiction is conferred on those courts regarding the areas of the cities in which they are situated, and there is only 01. ..... appointment as guardian of person or property of a minor except in those cases where the high court specifically enjoys ordinary original civil jurisdiction, which for all practical purposes is confined to the high courts of calcutta, bombay and madras with regard to their cities.it is worthy of note that in the letters patent of those high courts there is both clause (12) which empowers them to 'receive', try and determine suits arising within the local limits of their .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 2013 (HC)

C.W.P.No.21862 of 2012 Vs. Union Bank of India and Others …responden ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... mr.singh has further argued that e-auction may be relevant where the intending bidders are the corporate and educated citizens, but where the property to be sold is located in the remote rural areas without any computer facility or computer knowing personnel or when the intending bidders are not computer literate, the process of e-auction will actually frustrate the intention of obtaining maximum price for the property to be sold. ..... the supreme court in chairman and managing director, sipcot, madras case (supra) has held in the matter of sale of public property, the dominant consideration is to secure the best price for the property to be sold and this can be achieved only when c.w.p.no.21862 o 4. ..... the debt recovery tribunals are, therefore, directed to adopt the process of e- auction in the case of properties, which are being sold in municipal areas, where the computer knowing personnel would be available to participate in the process. ..... in m/s raman and raman ltd.versus the state of madras & others air 195.sc 694.the supreme court while examining section 43-a of the motor vehicles act, 1939 held that the power with the government to dispose of cases in a particular way, would be destructive of c.w.p.no.21862 o 6. ..... in support of the argument, learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon the judgment of hon ble supreme court in chairman and managing director, sipcot, madras & others versus contromix pvt.ltd.by its director (finance) seetharaman, madras & another air 199.sc 1632. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 27 2012 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Faridabad Vs. M/S Hemla Embroidery Mills (P ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... year 2001-02 by relying upon the judgment of the hon'ble madras high court in the case of cit vs. ..... area-ii, faridabad for the asstt. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 18 2010 (HC)

Keshav Kaushik Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Haryana and ors. Etc. Etc.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... bar councils act, 1926 (38 of 1926), immediately before the appointed day 3*[including persons, being citizens of india, who before the 15th day of august, 1947, were enrolled as advocates under the said act in any area which before the said date was comprised within india as defined in the government of india act, 1935, and who at any time, express an intention in the prescribed manner to practise within the jurisdiction of the bar ..... air 1961 mad 450 where the division bench had held, ' the duties of the government pleader, madras are duties of a public nature. ..... pleader high court, madras and anr. ..... ' referring to the observations of a division bench of a madras high court in a. ..... the hon'ble supreme court observed 'we do recognize its importance in an era of infiltration of politicking even in forbidden areas. ..... (2) the central government may appoint one or more public prosecutors for the purpose of conducting any case or class of cases in any district, or local area. ..... the complexity of the judicial functions imposes an onerous duty upon the courts in administration of justice, be it violation of fundamental rights, civil rights, disputes relating to property, matrimonial and host of other areas. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 04 2006 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax-i Vs. Abhishek Industries Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2006)205CTR(P& H)304; [2006]286ITR1(P& H)

..... relied upon by learned counsel for the assessee , is extracted below:4-a (1) notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision of these rules, and subject to the provisions of sub-rule (i) group of industries which are set up in `a' category area on or after the first day of october, 1992 and the goods produced by them shall be exempt from the payment of sales tax for a period of ten years commencing from the date of production for the ..... years from the date of production and the quantum is fixed at 300 per cent of the fixed capital investment as far as group of industries set up in `a' category, whereas for the industries set up in `b' category area, the over-all quantum of exemption is limited to 150 per cent of the fixed capital investment to be availed within 7 years ..... [1996]220itr626(mad) , madras high court held that the subsidy received by the assessee in respect of revenue expenditure incurred in modernisation of its plant in its industrial unit, established in a backward area from sipcot, was revenue ..... of income-tax : [1999]238itr939(mad) , while dealing with a similar proposition, madras high court held as under:the amount so lent, according to the assessee, came ..... be given refund of sales tax on purchase of machinery as well as on raw materials to enable the assessee to acquire new plant and machinery for further expansion of its manufacturing capacity in a backward area, the entire subsidy must be held to be a capital receipt in the hands of the assessee .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //