Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: madras area Court: punjab and haryana Page 93 of about 16,880 results (0.126 seconds)

Present: Mr. R.K.Chopra Sr. Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

cwp no.1163 of 2014 1 in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh 107 cwp no.1163 of 2014 date of decision: 25.4.2014 punjab jal sarot mulazim union punjab through its president ......petitioner versus state of punjab and another .......respondents coram: hon'ble mrs.justice sabina present: mr.r.k.chopra, sr.advocate, with ms.maninder kaur, advocate, for the petitioner. **** sabina, j. this petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking quashing of notification dated 27.2.2013 (annexure p-4) and orders dated 21.3.2013 (annexure p-5) and 25.9.2013 (annexure p-6).learned senior counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is a union of operational staff of class iii and iv employees employed with punjab water resources and management and development corporation limited, chandigarh. case of the petitioner, in brief, is that the service conditions of the employees were governed by punjab civil service rules (the rules for short).respondent-corporation, by ignoring the amended rule 3.26 of the rules, has issued instructions dated 25.9.2013 and has thereby, denied the benefit of extension in service to its employees in terms of amendment in the rules. devi anita the controvers.involved in the present case is no longer 2014.04.26 11:05 i am approving this document chandigarh cwp no.1163 of 2014 2 res integra. this court, while disposing of cwp no.11994 of 2013 and other connected matters.has upheld similar instructions, whereby the board had declined to .....

Ram Sarup and Another Vs. DIn Dayal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1997P& H1

..... practice as a lawyer or as a registered practitioner within the meaning of that expression as used in the punjab medical registration act, 1916, or for the residence of his son who is married if-(a) his son as aforesaid is not occupying in the urban area concerned any other building for use as office, consulting room or residence, as the case may be; and (b)his son as aforesaid has not vacated such a building without sufficient cause after the commencement of this act ..... purposes of thissub-clause 'family' means such relations ofthe landlord as ordinarily live with him andare dependent upon him;(b) in the case of rented land, if he requires it for his own use, is not occupying in the-urban area concerned for the purpose of his business any other rented land and has not vacated such rented land and without sufficient cause after the commencement of the 1949 act;(c)in the case of 'any ..... , 1916, the punjab ayurvedic and unani practitioners act, 1963, or the punjab homoeopathic practitioners act, 1965, or for the residence of his son who is married:provided that such son is not occupying in the urban area concerned any other building for use as office, consulting room or residence, as the case may be, and has not vacated it without sufficient cause after the commencement of the 1949 act;(v) he is a member of the armed forces ..... associated publishers (madras) ltd. .....

Bishan Lal Gupta Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1977P& H7

m.r. sharma, j. 1. in exercise of the powers under article 234 of the constitution of india, the governor of har-yana was pleased to appoint the appellant shri bishan lal gupta to the har-yana civil service (judicial branch) with effect from december 8, 1966. while he was on probation, his services were terminated by an order passed under sub-rule (2) of rule 7 appearing in part 'd' of the haryana civil services (judicial branch) rules, 1951, issued in the name of the governor of haryana on september 11, 1969. 2. the appellant challenged the termination of his services in a suit filed before the learned subordinate judge, 1st class chandigarh, which was dismissed on august 26, 1970. he filed an appeal in this court which came up before me while sitting in chambers. 3. it was argued that the impugned action had been taken against the appellant on the basis of allegations of misconduct which cast an indelible stigma against his character and the order terminating his services, though innocuously worded, was hit by article 311 of the constitution of india. it was also submitted that the impugned order could not be deemed to have been passed by the competent authority inasmuch as there was no conclusive evidence on the record to show that the chief minister of haryana had passed the relevant order on the official file. since the questions involved were of importance and likely to arise in a large number of cases. i requested my lord the chief justice to constitute a larger bench .....

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Adviser to the Administration, Union Terri ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1996P& H69

..... it is significant that earlier the categorisation was made exclusively on the total plot area and the plot area of both these plot is 3312.5 sq. ..... 10 and 11, sector 7, chandigarh are identical in terms of the area of the plot, constructed area, and also that h. no. .....

The State of Punjab Vs. Smt. Harcharan Kaur

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1975P& H66

..... , to be served on the following persons, anmely:-- (a) the applicant; (b) all persons interested in the objection, except such (if any) of them as have consented without protest to receive payment of the compensation awarded; and, (c) if the objection is in regard to the area of the land or to the amount of the compensation, the collector. 31. ..... a similar matter was canvassed before a learned single judge of the madras high court in mrs. s. ..... the collector of madras, air 1958 mad 186 (187). ..... states union land acquisition act, 1953, wherein it was stated that the land mentioned in the notification was likely to be required to be taken by government at public expense for a public purpose, namely, for construction of roads in notified area no. .....

Sumer Chand Vs. the Haryana Khadi and Village Industries Board and Ano ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1991P& H106

..... tamil nadu small industries development corporation, air 1981 madras 318, cited in support of his submission that the insertion of section 32-a in the principal act by act no. .....

Miss. Chetna Sharma and Others Vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh and Ano ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1992P& H109; (1992)101PLR291

..... commissioner and secretary to government of tamil nadu, health department, madras (1987) 4 serv lr 598 : (air 1987 sc 2074). ..... course, is pre-eminence in sports, and not academic excellence,' approved the division bench judgment of madras high court in p. .....

Shri Amar Singh, Clerk of Court, Office of the Senior Sub-judge, Amrit ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1976P& H215

..... consequently the field of promotion of these functionaries is entirely and exclusively within the area of the high court's control and any intrusion therein would be unwarranted in view of the provisions of the constitution. ..... it is well settled that even if the rules have been made by the state legislature executive instructions can be issued to cover the area which is not covered by the rules made by the legislature. ..... that these posts are filled by appointment or recruitment by the high court as a delegate of the state government and that the state government is, therefore, empowered to make rules in respect of these appointments or to issue instructions covering the area regarding which there are no rules. ..... on behalf of the petitioner it is, thus conceded that the high court would have the power to issue instructions of this nature within its area of authority.24. .....

Deputy Inspector General of Police, Ambala Range Ambala and anr. Vs. S ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1977P& H196

..... the area of judicial scrutiny in such matters is extremely limited, because the rule-making authority is presumed to know its own requirements and if on a proper examination or scrutiny, the rule appears to be reasonable, it is not the function of the courts to strike it .....

Manmohan Singh Tandon Vs. Manmohan Singh Gujral and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1969P& H331

..... thereupon the area comprised in the said union territory ceased to form part of the then existing state of punjab. .....