Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: madhya pradesh reorganisation act 2000 section 29 procedure as to appeals to supreme court Page 1 of about 361 results (0.275 seconds)

V.K. Walnekar and ors. Vs. Bilaspur Raipur Kshetriya GramIn Bank and a ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : AIR2006Chh92

..... similar points. their contention is that this high court is a successor high court of the high court of madhya pradesh as it came into existence after bifurcation as an effect of coming into force of the reorganisation act 2000. by virtue of section 25, the law in force immediately before, the appointed day with respect ..... of india. after the state reorganisation act, 1956 was applied, the erstwhile state of madhya pradesh (undivided prior to 1-11-2000) was formed by including the old states of madhya pradesh, madhya bharat, bhopal and vindhya pradesh. the courts of judicial commissioner in the state of bhopal and vindhya pradesh and the high court of madhya bharat were abolished and the ..... whether this high court is a successor high court of the high court of madhya pradesh or not? to deal with this question, various provisions of the reorganisation act are to be looked into. as referred to above, section 21 of the said act is to be considered. the said section reads as under:21. high court .....

High Court Bar Association Through its Secretary, Chhattisgarh Vs. Sta ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... (1980) 3 scc 285. 7. anandilal chourasia v. state of m. p. (air 2008 mp 257) (fb). 7. upon re-organization of state of madhya pradesh vide madhya pradesh re-organization act, 2000, state of chhattisgarh was separately carved out and separate high court was also created for the state of chhattisgarh which came into existence on the appointed day i ..... the law in force immediately before the appointed day, are exercisable in respect to that part of the state territories by the high court of madhya pradesh. section 25 of the reorganization act provides that subject to the provisions of part iv, the law in force immediately before the appointed day with respect to practise and procedure in ..... adhiniyam, 1981 (no. 29 of 1981). the validity of this, however, was challenged before the high court of madhya pradesh and a full bench of the high court vide its judgment dated 27-8-1984 declared the act of 1981 ultra vires the powers of the state legislature (reported in air 1985 mp 42). the effect was that .....

Radhelal Gupta Vs. State Bar Council of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2002MP98; 2002(2)MPHT10

..... term of the members of the state bar council came to cessation on 23-11-2000. in the meantime, as the facts have been adumbrated, the madhya pradesh state reorganisation act, 2000 (act no. 20 of 2000) [for brevity 'the reorganisation act'] came into force with effect from 1-11-2000. it is incontrovertible, whatever may be the reasons, the state bar council did not hold its ..... to refer to certain provisions of the reorganisation act. section 2(e) deals with 'existing state of madhya pradesh'. it reads as under :--'existing state of madhya pradesh means the state of madhya pradesh as existing immediately before the appointed day.'section 2(j) of the reorganisation act provides as under:--'successor state, in relation to the existing state of madhya pradesh means the state of madhya pradesh or chhattisgarh.'8. though mr. tiwari .....

M.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2006(8)SC629; 2006(9)SCALE194; (2006)10SCC736

s.b. sinha, j.1. interpretation and application of section 58 of the madhya pradesh reorganisation act, 2000 (for short 'the 2000 act') arises for consideration in these writ petitions.parliament enacted electricity (supply) act, 1948 (for short 'the 1948 act'), in terms whereof the madhya pradesh state electricity board (for short 'mpseb') was established on 1.4.1957. it was a body corporate in terms of section 12 thereof ..... . the territorial jurisdiction of the board was the entire state of madhya pradesh as notified and constituted by 'states reorganisation act, 1956' (for short 'the 1956 act').2. a new state known as state of chhattisgarh comprising of 16 districts carved out of the state of madhya pradesh was formed on 1.11.2000. distribution of assets and liabilities of the states are .....

Accheram Navarang Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2004(1)MPHT17(CG)

..... is for the central government to ensure fair and equitable treatment to all persons affected by the relevant provisions of the part viii of the m.p. reorganisation act, 2000 and the proper consideration of any representations made by such persons. under the facts and circumstances this court would like to observe that power of central ..... any representations made by such persons.72. power of central government to give directions.-the central government may, give such directions to the state government of madhya pradesh and the state government of chhattisgarh as may appear to it to be necessary for the purpose of giving effect to the foregoing provisions of this part ..... provided that the conditions of service applicable immediately before the appointed day in the case of any person deemed to have been allocated to the state of madhya pradesh or to the state of chhattisgarh under section 68 shall not be varied to his disadvantage except with the previous approval of the central government.(2) .....

The District Industries Association, Bilaspur Vs. State of Chhattisgar ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2002(1)MPHT4(CG)

..... provisions of section 59 of the madhya pradesh reorganisation act, 2000 which relates to m.p. state financial corporation established under the state financial corporations act, 1951. section 59 reads as under:--59. provisions as to madhya pradesh financial corporation.-- (1) the madhya pradesh state financial corporation established under the state financial corporations act, 1951 (63 of 1951) ..... section shall be construed as preventing the government of the state of madhya pradesh and chhattisgarh from constituting, at any time on or after the appointed day, a state financial corporation for that slate under the slate financial corporations act, 1951.in view of the aforesaid discussion, it appears to us ..... been filed with an ulterior motive. counsels for the respondents submit that keeping in mind the provisions of section 59 of the m.p. reorganisation act, 2000 and the fact that each individual unit obtained loan on its own and each unit has distinct features to its own knowledge, pursued .....

Rao Nihalkaran Vs. Ramgopal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1966SC1485; [1966]3SCR427

..... 1956 consisting of the part b state of madhya bharat, parts of the former state of madhya pradesh, the territories of the states of bhopal and vindhya pradesh and sironj sub-division of kotah in the former state ..... into this union. under the constitution, madhya bharat was formed as a part b state out of the territories of the united states of gwalior, indore & malwa and certain enclaves merged therein and the chief commissioner's province of panth piploda. under the states reorganisation act, 1956 a new state of madhya pradesh was formed as from november 1, ..... of 1954 was enacted, and pursuant to the provisions thereof hearing of the appeal remained stayed till 1960. in the mean time the madhya pradesh land revenue code (act 20 of 1959) was brought into force. ramgopal urged before the district court that he had by virtue of s. 185 of the code .....

A.J. Patel and ors. Vs. the State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1965Guj234a

..... subject to the powers of the central government under the states reorganisation act. after the newly constituted states came into being on 1st november 1956 a conference was convened by the central government of the representatives of the central government and the representatives of the states of andhra pradesh, bombay, bihar kerala, madhya pradesh mysore, madras, punjab, rajasthan and west bengal. the aforesaid conference was ..... the course to the powers of the central government under the act. this reply was circulated amongst all the states affected by the reorganization of states. on the appointed day the reorganisation of states took place as provided in the act and as a result thereof the new states of kerala, mysore, bombay, madhya pradesh, rajasthan and laccadive, minkcoyand amindivi islands came to be formed .....

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Bhopal Sugar Industries Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1964SC1179; [1964]52ITR443(SC); 1964MhLJ697(SC); [1964]6SCR846

..... 67 of 1956), territory of the part 'c' state of bhopal was incorporated with effect from november 1, 1956, into the newly formed state of madhya pradesh. section 119 of the states reorganisation act, 1956, enacted that by the constitution of the reorganized state, no change in the laws in force which immediately before november 1, 1956, extended ..... is infringement of art. 14 of the constitution is advanced on the sole ground that in the reorganized state of madhya pradesh formed under states reorganisation act, 1956, agricultural income-tax is levied within the territory of the former state of bhopal and not in the rest of the territories of ..... and must be declared void'. 4. authority of the part c state of bhopal to enact the act, as it originally stood, is not in dispute; nor are the provisions of s. 119 of the states reorganisation act and the madhya pradesh adaptation of laws (state and concurrent subjects) order, 1956, challenged as incompetent. the plea that there .....

A.K. Shrivastava Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(3)MPHT1

..... petition no. 3597/2001) providing transfer of applications and cases pending before the tribunal. 3. the petitioners have also challenged the constitutional validity of section 74 of the madhya pradesh reorganisation act, 2000 (for short 'the act of 2000'). in the alternative it has been prayed that if the aforesaid reliefs are not granted then it be declared that the chairman, vice-chairman, members, officers ..... the array of petitioners. 5. consequent to the decision to carve out the state of chhattisgarh from the existing state of madhya pradesh, the madhya pradesh reorganisation act of 2000 has been enacted by the parliament. under the provisions of the act of 2000, two successor states namely state of madhya pradesh and state of chhattisgarh came into existence w.e.f. 1-11-2000. section 74 of the .....