Lucknow - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: lucknow Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 320 results (0.025 seconds)Sushil Kumar Srivastava Vs. Lucknow Development Authority
Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on: Jul-03-2012
..... passed by the u p state consumer disputes redressal commission lucknow in appeal no 1639 of 1997 the original complainant has ..... the appeal before the state commission was filed by the lucknow development authority lda against order dated 7 8 1997 passed ..... having been made on 31 5 1994 counsel for the respondent lucknow development authority however contends that since the complainant petitioner had .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUmesh Prakash and Another Vs. State Bank of India Hazratganj Lucknow, ...
Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on: Mar-05-2012
..... 8 2008 passed by uttar pradesh state consumer disputes redressal commission lucknow for short state commission vide which appeal of the petitioner was ..... business that it hardly remain possible for him to go to lucknow and inquire the matter from time to time and constrain to ..... hire the service of some other advocate and decided to go lucknow and collect his file from his counsel and when he reached .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC.C.E, Lucknow Vs. Electricity Pole Manufacturing, Unit, Sub-divisiona ...
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jun-22-2012
..... into account learned a r submitted that the respondent is a lucknow unit of upseb up power corporation ltd which also have various ..... copy of the gazette notification no 151 p 1 2000 24 lucknow 14 january 2000 whereby it has been notified that uttar pradesh ..... that the respondent m s electricity pole manufacturing unit is a lucknow manufacturing unit of up power corporation ltd which was earlier known .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDan Singh Bisht and Others Vs. State of U.P. Through Secretary Departm ...
Court: Uttaranchal
Decided on: Jul-13-2012
..... the bar that many of the employees did join their services at its headquarter at lucknow and was subsequently absorbed in state of uttar pradesh the petitioners before this court though ..... representation before the appropriate authority i e executive director uttar pradesh state employees welfare corporation lucknow who may redress the same in accordance with law 9 with the aforesaid observation the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLt. Col. S.K. Goswami, Sm (ic-53992h) S/O Lt. Col. G.S. Goswami (Retd. ...
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Lucknow
Decided on: Jan-06-2012
..... career of the officer the applicant accordingly stands posted as joint director national cadet corps lucknow 2 the facts of the case are as follows the applicant was commissioned in the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNo. 6390993-m Nk/Skt (Now Sepoy), Lalan Kumar, Son of Sri Dukhan Prasa ...
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Lucknow
Decided on: Mar-19-2012
janardan sahai 1 the applicant was enrolled in the indian army on 04 07 1991 and was promoted to the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Awadh Wood Products, Bahraich Vs. U.P Power Corporation Limited, ...
Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
Decided on: Jul-26-2012
..... 17 11 2003 the appellant filed an appeal under section 36 of reforms act before lucknow bench of allahabad high court in january 2004 this appeal before the high court of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Shree Bhawani Paper Mills Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, ...
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2012
..... 2006 07 the said show cause notice was adjudicated by the additional commissioner central excise lucknow confirming the demand along with confirmation of interest and imposition of penalty the challenge to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Oudh Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Cce, Lucknow
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Nov-16-2012
mathew john the issue involved in this appeal is the cenvat credit taken on plate shapes and sections of steel...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Pushker Paint Industries Vs. C.C.E. Lucknow
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2012
archana wadhwa the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of paints which are being packed in drums their factory was...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial