Looking - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: looking Year: 1925 Page 1 of about 310 results (0.092 seconds)(Thirumulu) Suppu Shetti Vs. Arunachalam Chettiar and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-01-1925
Reported in: AIR1926Mad1065
..... it cannot be imported into service law where the principle of double jeopardy itself is looked down upon therefore the explanation 1 to rule 14 b of the impugned rules treating ..... it cannot be imported into service law where the principle of double jeopardy itself is looked down upon therefore the explanation 1 to rule 14 b of the impugned rules treating .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKandan Ashtamoorthi Nambudripad Vs. Rama Mudali and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-03-1925
Reported in: AIR1926Mad1052
..... it cannot be imported into service law where the principle of double jeopardy itself is looked down upon therefore the explanation 1 to rule 14 b of the impugned rules treating ..... it cannot be imported into service law where the principle of double jeopardy itself is looked down upon therefore the explanation 1 to rule 14 b of the impugned rules treating .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Venugopal Nayudu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-23-1925
Reported in: AIR1926Mad1044
..... it cannot be imported into service law where the principle of double jeopardy itself is looked down upon therefore the explanation 1 to rule 14 b of the impugned rules treating ..... it cannot be imported into service law where the principle of double jeopardy itself is looked down upon therefore the explanation 1 to rule 14 b of the impugned rules treating .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT(Kaji) Mahomed Ibrahim Vs. Sundaram Chetti and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-05-1925
Reported in: AIR1926Mad1066
..... it cannot be imported into service law where the principle of double jeopardy itself is looked down upon therefore the explanation 1 to rule 14 b of the impugned rules treating ..... it cannot be imported into service law where the principle of double jeopardy itself is looked down upon therefore the explanation 1 to rule 14 b of the impugned rules treating .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUlawappa Basawaneppa Hugar Vs. Gadigewa Hugar
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-25-1925
Reported in: AIR1925Bom477; (1925)27BOMLR948
..... 1879 section 133 sanad owner of building site sanad a document of title collector s looks entries an entry in the collector s books that a certain person is the occupant .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCarroll Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-02-1925
..... engaged in patrolling the road leading from detroit to grand rapids looking for violations of the prohibition act this seems to have been ..... grand rapids while cronenwett thayer and scully remained on the road looking for other cars of whose coming they had information the ..... statement made by one of the officers that they were not looking for defendants at the particular time when they appeared we .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTH.W. Smith Vs. Emperor
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-26-1925
Reported in: 91Ind.Cas.889
..... is called for i fail to see a driver cannot be expected to look out for what can only be descirbed as a very abnormal condition ..... he should find persons sleeping on a road if therefore he did not look for persons bleeping on a road he cannot be held guilty of ..... if he had not been talking it is highly improbable he would have looked out for persons sleeping on the road there is nothing to prevent .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri Satyadhyantirtha Swami Vs. Raghunath Daji Patil
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-09-1925
Reported in: (1926)28BOMLR743
..... the lands are inadmissible in evidence but that those documents can be looked at for the collateral purpose of ascertaining the origin and nature ..... and nature can be so ascertained to say that you can look at the whole of the terms of the documents although under ..... are inadmissible in evidence it is true that the documents can be looked at to show that the plaintiffs were in possession as tenants .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT(Shri) Satyadhyantirtha Swami Vs. Raghunath Daji Patil and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-09-1925
Reported in: AIR1926Bom384
..... the lands are inadmissible in evidence but that those documents can be looked at for the collateral purpose of ascertaining the origin and nature ..... and nature can be so ascertained to say that you can look at the whole of the terms of the documents although under ..... are inadmissible in evidence it is true that the documents can be looked at to show that the plaintiffs ware in possession as tenants .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVeerasami Pillai Vs. V.S.T.N. Chidambaram Chettiar and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-28-1925
Reported in: AIR1926Mad894; 92Ind.Cas.819
..... the transaction was one which the principal would be very likely to look at with very great suspicion and accordingly when the principal as in ..... not see how any court could decide otherwise when it has really looked with any care at the statute what did the plaintiff do who ..... the simple reason that the learned judge in this case and it looks very much as if he was right has found a fact that this .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial