Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: lokayukta act 1984 Page 1 of about 492,047 results (0.298 seconds)

Feb 04 2004 (HC)

Prof. S.N. Hegde Vs. the Lokayukta and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2004KAR3892; 2004(3)KarLJ505

..... in these writ petitions important questions of law as regards the power of the lokayukta and the upalokayukta to investigate complaints under the provisions of the karnataka lokayukta act, 1984, the procedure to be followed in such investigations, the effect of the report submitted by the lokayukta and the consequences that flow from the declarations made under the act arise for consideration, in addition to the question whether the lokayukta or upalokayukta has jurisdiction to investigate a complaint against a vice-chancellor of a university.2. ..... 10620-260-10880-320-13440-380-14960 has conferred such power under clause (iv) of sub-section (1) of section 7 of the act on lokayukta, in order to appreciate this contention it is necessary to look into and the terms of the notification:notificationin exercise of the powers conferred by item (iv) of sub-section (1) of section 7 of the karnataka lokayukta act, 1984 (karnataka act 4 of 1985) and in consultation with the karnataka lokayukta and in sup recession of notification no. ..... --'we have not the slightest hesitation in holding that the proceedings under section 9 of the karnataka lokayukta act, 1984 are quasi-judicial in nature. ..... --(i) the lokayukta has no jurisdiction to investigate into any alleged action of the vice-chancellor, under section 12 of the karnataka lokayukta act, 1984 (hereinafter for short referred to as 'the act'). .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 17 2004 (HC)

Mohammed Saleem Vs. State of Karnataka by Lokayukta Police and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2005CriLJ381; ILR2004KAR5143; 2005(1)KarLJ110

..... the karnataka lokayukta act, 1984, being a special enactment has got a over-riding effect and has empowered the lokayukta and upalokayukta to take action against the public servants for the acts like corruption inaction, omission or commission in connection with discharge of their duties and such other acts and under such circumstances when said complaint is being made to the lokayukta or upalokayukta as per section 9 of the lokayukta act has noted above ..... counsel for the petitioner contends that for any prosecution to be launched under the provisions of the prevention of corruption act, sanction of the government under section 19 of the prevention of corruption act is mandatory and that the provisions of the prevention of corruption act are quite different from the provisions of the karnataka lokayukta act, 1984, not only in the matter of investigation but also on other aspects. ..... further contends that once a judicial order is passed for accepting 'b' final report and holding that there is no sanction granted by the government as required under section 19 of the prevention of corruption act, it is hot open for the lokayukta police to circumvent the law by obtaining an order under section 14 of the lokayukta act, 1984 from upalokayukta and to file charge sheet. ..... extra material produced was that the order of the hon'ble upalokayukta dated 15.10.2001 under section 14 of the karnataka lokayukta act, 1984, according sanction to prosecute the petitioner for the above said offences.4. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2013 (SC)

Mr. Justice Chandrashekaraiah (Retd.) Vs. Janekere C. Krishna and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2013(1)SCJ513; 2013(1)KLT51(SN); AIR2013SCW706; AIR2013SC726

..... the suitability of a person for appointment as upa-lokayukta has primacy over the views of others involved in the consultation ..... several related questions require consideration, including whether the upa-lokayukta is a quasi-judicial authority or is only (without meaning any disrespect) an investigator; who should initiate the process of appointment of an upa-lokayukta; what is meant by consultation in the context of section 3(2)(b) of the karnataka lokayukta act, 1984 (for short the act); whether consultation is at all mandatory under section 3(2)(b) of the act; how is the process of consultation required to be carried out; whether the view of the chief justice of the karnataka high court regarding ..... the principal question for consideration is whether the appointment of justice chandrashekaraiah as an upa-lokayukta was in accordance with the provisions of section 3(2)(b) of the karnataka lokayukta act, 1984 which requires consultation, inter alia, with the chief justice of the karnataka high court. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 2009 (HC)

Sri M.A. Parthasarathy S/O Late M.A. Srinivasan Vs. the Spl. Deputy Co ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(5)KarLJ203

..... muniraju as they are not public servants within the meaning1 of section 2(12) of the karnataka lokayukta act, 1984 and the complaint was filed with a request to take action against the respondents in the said complaint, who are public servants/for their-in-action ..... into the aforesaid matters the karnataka lokayukta act, 1984 came to be enacted by the state legislature (for short hereinafter referred to as 'the act'). ..... ](3) where two or more upa-lokayuktaa are appointed under this act, the [lokayukta] may, by general ox special order, assign to each of them matters which may be investigated by them under this act:provided that no investigation made by an upa-lokayukta under this act, and no action taken ox things done by him in respect of such investigation shall be open to question on the ground only that such investigation relates to a matter which is not assigned ..... the object behind this legislation and the clear definitions contained in the act regarding action, allegation, grievance, maladminstration and the persons against whom the lokayukta and upalokayukta has jurisdiction, the jurisdiction of both of them is clearly ..... after holding that no case for proceedings under the act against the public servant is made out, in the last paragraph at 16, this is what the lokayukta has held as under:however, the copies of this report along with entire documentary evidence and oral evidence pertaining to the above compliant shall be sent to the chief secretary to government of karnataka, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2010 (HC)

B.M. Muniappa Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2010(2)KarLJ54,ILR2010KAR3827

..... in law, in view of sub-section (2-a) of section 7 of the karnataka lokayukta act, 1984, which requires that a reference is to be made by the state government in the lokayukta conducting an investigation against a public servant and whether a demi-official letter issued by the principal secretary, urban development department, can be construed as a reference made by the state government to the lokayukta.the question is no longer res integra stands answered by the decisions cited by the ..... action being taken by the state government in calling upon the lokayukta to investigate into the alleged actions of the petitioner in the instant case on hand.article 166 of the constitution of india read with rules 18 and 19 of the karnataka government (transaction of business) rules, 1977 would indicate that an order of reference required under section 7(2-a) of the lokayukta act, 1984 could not be made in the form and in terms of annexure ..... the lokayukta was however addressed to take up investigation under the karnataka lokayukta act, 1984 and ..... reference made and it was reiterated on behalf of the government that a reference was made to the lokayukta, a copy of that letter is produced as annexure-r1 to the statement of objections.as regards the contention that the petitioner was not afforded the services of a legal counsel is concerned, it is contended that the lokayukta act does not prescribe any such requirement where a public servant being investigated being permitted to engage the services .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 1995 (HC)

A.K. Subbaiah Vs. Lokayuktha for Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1995KAR620; 1995(3)KarLJ20

..... thereof seeks for quashing of the said two orders and for a mandamus to consider the material placed before him and to conduct an investigation into the allegations levelled against respondents 2 to 5 under section 9{3) of the karnataka lokayukta act, 1984 (hereinafter, for short, referred to as the 'act'). ..... but, considering the nature of the complaint made and the specific allegation in respect of which grievance was made before the lokayukta, no fault could be found with the lokayukta that the complaint against respondents 2, 3 and 4 was one of cheating, while complaint against respondent-4 was one of not taking action as per law. ..... a reading of the order made by the lokayukta would make it clear that it is only under section 9(5) (b) of the act it has refused to investigate the complaint made to it. ..... moreover, in the proceedings arising under the act, there is no lis as such between the complainant and the respondents wherein adjudication is made by the lokayukta. ..... so far as the lokayukta is concerned, the object of investigation is to enquire into the conduct of public servants in relation to an allegation or grievance as defined under the act. ..... the procedure in regard to complaints filed before the lokayukta and the investigation into the same are dealt with under section 9 of the act. ..... on this complaint, the lokayukta conducted a preliminary enquiry as contemplated under section 9 of the act. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 2013 (SC)

State of Gujarat And Ors. Vs. Hon'ble Mr. Justice (Retd) Ramesh Amritl ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the later judgment has also considered similar such provisions contained in andhra pradesh lokayukta act, 1983, assam lokayukta and upalokayukta act 1985, bihar lokayukta act 1973, chhattisgarh lok aayog adhyadesh, 2002, delhi lokayukta and upa-lokayukta act 1995, gujarat lokayukta act 1986, jharkhand lokayukta act, 2001, haryana lokayukta act, 2002 and kerala lokayukta act, 1999 and held that each state has adopted different eligibility criteria, method of ..... this court considered the question about the primacy of the views expressed by the chief justice of the high court of karnataka in making appointment to the post of lokayukta and upa- lokayukta by the governor of karnataka in exercise of power conferred on him under section 3(2)(a) and (b) of the karnataka lokayukta act, 1984 (hereinafter called as karnataka act ). ..... appeal nos.197-199 of 2013 @ slp (c) nos.15658-15660 of 2012 which related to appointment of upa-lokayukta under section 3 of the karnataka lokayukta act, 1984. ..... as far as the gujarat lokayukta act is concerned, the proviso to section 3(1) of the gujarat lokayukta act is relevant which is to the following effect: 3(1) for the purpose of conducting investigations in accordance with provisions of this act, the governor shall, by warrant under his hand and seal, appoint a person to be known as the lokayukta.provided that the lokayukta shall be appointed after consultation with the chief justice of the high court and except where such appointment is to be made at a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 1989 (HC)

N. Gundappa Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1990KAR223; 1989(3)KarLJ425

..... basavarajappa, who is stated to be a relation of the petitioner on the ground that a report is made by the upa lokayukta that the petitioner is possessed of assets and liabilities disproportionate to his known source of income, it is relevant to notice that in respect of the officers of the corporation of the city of bangalore, the state government becomes a competent authority if a proceeding is initiated under the karnataka lokayukta act, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') and a report is submitted to the government is respect of the officers of the corporation. ..... .2) every complaint shall be made in the form of a statement supported by an affidavit and in such form and in such manner as may be prescribed.3) where the lokayukta or an upalokayukta proposes, after making such preliminary inquiry as he deemed fit to conduct any investigation under this act, he, -'a) shall forward a copy of the complaint to the public servant and the competent authority concerned;b) shall forward to such public servant an opportunity to offer his comments on such complaint;c) may make such ..... without that complaint, and in the absence of any reference made co him under sub-section (2a) of section 7 of the act, the lokayukta or the upalokayukta, as the case may be, could not have investigated into the matter. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 1989 (HC)

Dr. K. Chowdappa Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1990KAR798; 1989(3)KarLJ512

..... the contention urged on behalf of the petitioners is that the state government becomes a competent authority under the provisions of the karnataka lokayukta act, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') in respect of the officials of the corporation if the case is initiated only on the report made by the lokayukta or upalokayukta as the case may be under the provisions of the act. ..... it is further submitted that in case both these provisions are read apart, no one will file a complaint before the lokayukta or upalokayukta and everyone will file a complaint before the state government and it will be referred to the lokayukta or upalokayukta; that consequently, the very purpose and object of section 9 of the act and the protection assured to a public servant to save him from frivolous and vexatious complaints is rendered illusory. ..... in fact, the grounds on which the lokayukta or an upalokayukta can refuse to investigate or cease to investigate any complaint as enumerated in sub-section (5) of section 9 of the act, will have to be applied and the state government has to satisfy itself that the case does not fall under sub-section (5) of section 9 of the act before referring it to the lokayukta or an upafokayukta as the case may ..... in the instant case, the report is made by the upalokayukta under the provisions of the act, it is submitted that sub-section (3) of section 9 of the act ought to have been complied with by the upa lokayukta before making a report against the petitioners.4. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 1998 (SC)

State of Karnataka and ors. Vs. Kempaiah

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1998VAD(SC)300; AIR1998SC3047; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)435; 1998CriLJ4070; 1998(3)Crimes77(SC); JT1998(5)SC181; 1998(4)SCALE290; (1998)6SCC103; [1998]3SCR910; 1999(2)SLJ116(SC)

..... 1155 of 1993, only that part of the judgment is assailed, which deals with the interpretation of 'action' as defined in section 2(1) of the karnataka lokayukta act, 1984 (for short 'the k.l. ..... apropos to the preliminary inquiry the upalokayukta, by letter dated 18.5.93, called for comments of the respondent under section 9(3) of the lokayukta act. ..... section 7 deals with matters which may be investigated by the lokayukta or upalokayukta; section 8 enumerates matters which cannot be investigated under the act; sections 9 to 11 and rules 2 and 4 of the karnataka lokayukta rules, 1985 (for short 'the rules') prescribe procedure relating to complaints and investigations. ..... matters which may be investigated by the lokayukta and an upalokayukta - (1) subject of the provisions of this act, the lokayukta may investigate any action which is taken by or with the general or specific approval of, - (i) the chief minister; (ii) a minister or a secretary, (iii) a member of the state legislature; or (iv) any other public servant being a public servant of a class notified by the state government in consultation with the lokayukta in this behalf; in any case where a complaint involving a grievance or an allegation is made in respect of such action. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //