Logics - Judgment Search Results

Lewis Vs. Lewis and Clark Marine, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

lewis v lewis clark marine inc 531 u s 438 2001 october term 2000 syllabus lewis v lewis clark marine...

State of Bihar Vs. Braj Nandan Raut

Court: Patna

narayan roy j 1 heard counsel for the parties 2 by this application under section 482 of the code of...

Annapurna Udyog Bhandar and anr. Vs. Nasik Hing Supplying Co. and anr.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2002)1GLR456

sharad d dave j 1 being aggrieved by order dated 28 9 2001 passed by the learned city civil judge...

M/S. Iti Ltd., Bangalore Vs. Commissioner of Customs,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2001)(129)ELT526Tri(Bang.)

..... consider the goods under import not to be eligible as logic trouble shooting equipment for the purposes of benefit under notification ..... is obvious that the disputed goods cannot be treated as logic trouble shooting equipment for extending the benefit of notfn no ..... prove that the goods are not parts of computers but are logic trouble shooting equipment the equipment functions in conjunction with the .....

Tyler Vs. Cain

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 667 holding that a particular error is structural does not logically dictate the conclusion that the second teague exception has been ..... k e a new rule retroactive through multiple holdings that logically dictate the retroactivity of the new rule ibid to apply ..... is retroactive it is relatively easy to demonstrate the required logical relationship with respect to the first exception articulated in teague .....

Micoperi S.P.A. Milano Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2002)82ITD369(Mum.)

..... been rendered by the main contractors hhi and mdl is without any logical basis the language used in the notification is quite plain and ..... mineral oil and the distinction drawn by the learned counsel has no logical basis the manner in which the services have been rendered and ..... of the andhra pradesh high court supra appears to be quite logical because as per the agreement the tax has to be paid .....

Dyes and Chemical Workers Union Vs. Bombay Oil Industries Ltd. and anr ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [2001(89)FLR638]; (2001)ILLJ1252Bom

..... said judgment as an authority on the proposition canvassed even assuming such a proposition is logically deducible therefrom 16 smt mhatre referred to a judgment of the supreme court in ..... mhatre tried to argue deductively from this authority that the proposition canvassed by her is logically deducible from this judgment for reasons as already indicated such an argument cannot be countenanced .....

Commissioner of Customs, Vs. M/S. Deejay Dekelab Breeders (P)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

..... can be seen that dr thiyagasundaram being a geneticist drew logical onclusions and correctly deposed that the birds in the security ..... from his earlier statements but could not prove logically as to how the logical conclusions in his earlier statements were incorrect hence ..... observation of the adjudicating authority did not appear to be logical as the important factor to determine the fact whether the .....

Shafer Vs. South Carolina

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 857 recognizing that future dangerousness is an issue when it is a logical inference from the evidence or was injected into the case through ..... carolina 512 u s 154 1994 i am more attached to the logic of the constitution whose due process clause was understood as an ..... dissenting the third page or the fourth or fifth will be the logical enough extension of this novel requirement to cases in which the .....

Correctional Services Corp. Vs. Malesko

Court: US Supreme Court

..... individual directly responsible for the alleged injury on meyer s logic inferring a constitutional tort remedy against a private entity like ..... id at 395 internal quotation marks and citation omitted such logic does not apply to 74 respondent whose claim of negligence ..... doubtless correct that a broad interpretation of its rationale would logically produce such application but i am not inclined and the .....