Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE04H DAY OF JANUARY2022BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION No.52371/2019 (T-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION No.51473/2019 (T-TAR) WRIT PETITION No.52323/2019 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.52374/2019 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.651/2020 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.713/2020 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.2318/2020 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.6114/2020 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.6122/2020 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.3810/2021 (T-TAR) IN W.P. No.52371/2019 BETWEEN: M/s.V.S.Products A Proprietary Firm Represented by its Proprietor Mr. Manoj Kumar Srivastava S/o Sitaram Srivastava, Aged about 50 years, R/o Plot No.21-P, 2nd Phase, Antharasanahalli Industrial Area, Tumkur- 572 106 (Karnataka). Petitioner 2 (By Sri C.S.Vaidyanathan, Senior Advocate, Sri. K.G.Raghavan, Senior Advocate, Ms. Ananyaa Jagirdar, Sri. Prashanth F. Goudar, Sri. Goutham S. Bharadwaj and Sri. Vinay Kuttappa K.S., Advocates) AND:1. Union of India Represented by Join...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE04H DAY OF JANUARY2022BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION No.52371/2019 (T-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION No.51473/2019 (T-TAR) WRIT PETITION No.52323/2019 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.52374/2019 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.651/2020 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.713/2020 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.2318/2020 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.6114/2020 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.6122/2020 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.3810/2021 (T-TAR) IN W.P. No.52371/2019 BETWEEN: M/s.V.S.Products A Proprietary Firm Represented by its Proprietor Mr. Manoj Kumar Srivastava S/o Sitaram Srivastava, Aged about 50 years, R/o Plot No.21-P, 2nd Phase, Antharasanahalli Industrial Area, Tumkur- 572 106 (Karnataka). Petitioner 2 (By Sri C.S.Vaidyanathan, Senior Advocate, Sri. K.G.Raghavan, Senior Advocate, Ms. Ananyaa Jagirdar, Sri. Prashanth F. Goudar, Sri. Goutham S. Bharadwaj and Sri. Vinay Kuttappa K.S., Advocates) AND:1. Union of India Represented by Join...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE04H DAY OF JANUARY2022BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION No.52371/2019 (T-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION No.51473/2019 (T-TAR) WRIT PETITION No.52323/2019 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.52374/2019 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.651/2020 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.713/2020 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.2318/2020 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.6114/2020 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.6122/2020 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.3810/2021 (T-TAR) IN W.P. No.52371/2019 BETWEEN: M/s.V.S.Products A Proprietary Firm Represented by its Proprietor Mr. Manoj Kumar Srivastava S/o Sitaram Srivastava, Aged about 50 years, R/o Plot No.21-P, 2nd Phase, Antharasanahalli Industrial Area, Tumkur- 572 106 (Karnataka). Petitioner 2 (By Sri C.S.Vaidyanathan, Senior Advocate, Sri. K.G.Raghavan, Senior Advocate, Ms. Ananyaa Jagirdar, Sri. Prashanth F. Goudar, Sri. Goutham S. Bharadwaj and Sri. Vinay Kuttappa K.S., Advocates) AND:1. Union of India Represented by Join...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE04H DAY OF JANUARY2022BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION No.52371/2019 (T-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION No.51473/2019 (T-TAR) WRIT PETITION No.52323/2019 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.52374/2019 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.651/2020 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.713/2020 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.2318/2020 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.6114/2020 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.6122/2020 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.3810/2021 (T-TAR) IN W.P. No.52371/2019 BETWEEN: M/s.V.S.Products A Proprietary Firm Represented by its Proprietor Mr. Manoj Kumar Srivastava S/o Sitaram Srivastava, Aged about 50 years, R/o Plot No.21-P, 2nd Phase, Antharasanahalli Industrial Area, Tumkur- 572 106 (Karnataka). Petitioner 2 (By Sri C.S.Vaidyanathan, Senior Advocate, Sri. K.G.Raghavan, Senior Advocate, Ms. Ananyaa Jagirdar, Sri. Prashanth F. Goudar, Sri. Goutham S. Bharadwaj and Sri. Vinay Kuttappa K.S., Advocates) AND:1. Union of India Represented by Join...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE04H DAY OF JANUARY2022BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION No.52371/2019 (T-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION No.51473/2019 (T-TAR) WRIT PETITION No.52323/2019 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.52374/2019 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.651/2020 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.713/2020 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.2318/2020 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.6114/2020 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.6122/2020 (T-RES) WRIT PETITION No.3810/2021 (T-TAR) IN W.P. No.52371/2019 BETWEEN: M/s.V.S.Products A Proprietary Firm Represented by its Proprietor Mr. Manoj Kumar Srivastava S/o Sitaram Srivastava, Aged about 50 years, R/o Plot No.21-P, 2nd Phase, Antharasanahalli Industrial Area, Tumkur- 572 106 (Karnataka). Petitioner 2 (By Sri C.S.Vaidyanathan, Senior Advocate, Sri. K.G.Raghavan, Senior Advocate, Ms. Ananyaa Jagirdar, Sri. Prashanth F. Goudar, Sri. Goutham S. Bharadwaj and Sri. Vinay Kuttappa K.S., Advocates) AND:1. Union of India Represented by Join...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5120 OF2019Duncans Industries Ltd. .. Appellant Versus A. J.Agrochem .. Respondent JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 20.06.2019 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (for short NCLAT) by which the learned Appellate Tribunal has allowed the said appeal preferred by the respondent herein and has quashed and set aside the order dated 05.10.2018 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata (for short NCLT), holding that the respondents application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (for short IBC) would be maintainable, the original respondent has preferred the present appeal. 2 2. The facts of the case in nutshell are as under:2. 1 That the appellant is a Corporate Debtor. It is a company which owns and manages 14 tea gardens. Out of 14 tea gardens, the Central Government vide notifica...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE02D DAY OF JUNE, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.2584 OF2023(GM - RES) BETWEEN: MR.SANJAY KUMAR S/O MAHESH NARAYAN SAHAY AGED ABOUT56YEARS R/AT: NESTATES, PALLADIUM NO.547, 16TH A MAIN3D BLOCK, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU 560 034. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI NISHANTH A.V., ADVOCATE) AND:1. . ELIOR INDIA FOOD SERVICES LLP INCORPORATED UNDER THE LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP ACT, 2008 HAVING ITS OFFICE AT:001. CAMPUS3, ECOSPACE, OUTER RING ROAD, BELLANDURU BENGALURU 560 103 REPRESENTEDBY ITS DESIGNATE PARTNER/ AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR.ROHIT SAWHNEY. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI K.G.RAGHAVAN, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI PRASHANTH V.G, ADVOCATE FOR R-1; 2 R-2 TO R-4 ARE DELETED VIDE ORDER DATED0202.2023) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE226OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO RESTRAINING THE HONBLE LXXXV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, COMMERCIAL COURT AT BENGALURU (CCH-86) FROM PROCEEDING FURTH...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
- 1 - WPHC No.100008 of 2023 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE19H DAY OF APRIL, 2023 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WPHC No.100008 OF2023(-) BETWEEN: SMT. ALISHA W/O ABDULRZAK ADUR AGE22YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK R/O LAKSHMESHWAR, TQ. LAKSHMESHWAR DIST. GADAG58211 PETITIONER (BY SRI. S M KALWAD.,ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE UNDER SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT HOME ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT (LAW AND ORDER), VIDHAN SOUDHA, BENGALURU56000 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GADAG58211 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE GADAG58211 4. THE JAIL SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL PRISION, BALLARI58310 5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SHRIHATTI POLICE STATION DIST. GADAG58212 6. THE POLICE SUB INSPECTOR LAKSHMESHWAR POLICE STATION LAKSHMESHWAR, DIST. GADAG58211 RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.VIDYAVATHI M.KOTTURSHETTAR, AAG AND SRI.V.S.KALASURMATH, HCGP FOR R1 TO R6) - 2 - WPHC No.100008 of 2023 THIS WPHC FILED UNDER ARTICLE226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal Nos.185-186 of 2022 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) Nos. 5180-5181 of 2019) Serious Fraud Investigation Office .... Appellant(s) Versus Rahul Modi & Ors. . Respondent (s) JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.Leave granted.1. The order dated 31.05.2019 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana granting bail to Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 is assailed in this Appeal by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO).2. An investigation was directed to be conducted into the affairs of Adarsh Group of Companies and LLPs by the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 212(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013 and sub- sections (2) and (3)(c)(i) of Section 43 of the Limited Liability 1 | Pa ge Partnership Act, 2008. Inspectors were appointed by the Director, SFIO to carry out the investigation. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 were arrested pursuant to the approval granted by the Direct...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h March, 2019. CS(COMM) 696/2016 & IAs No.7189/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) & 10624/2016 (of defendant u/O XIII-A CPC) FILEX SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. .... Plaintiff Through: Mr. M.L. Mangla and Mr. Manish Singhal, Advs. Versus DEEPIKA FILE PRODUCTS ...Defendant Through: Ms. Haripriya Padmanabhan, Ms. and Ms. Bhuyan Runamoni Aishwarya Kane, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has instituted this suit for permanent injunction restraining passing off by defendant by violating the trade mark FILEX in respect of stationery including files, file covers, folders, diaries, note pads, office requisites of the plaintiff and for ancillary reliefs.2. The suit along with the application for interim relief came up before this Court first on 1st June, 2016, when though the suit was entertained and summons thereof ordered to be issued but ex-parte injunction sought not granted.3. Pleadings have been completed, wit...
Tag this Judgment!