Court : Kolkata
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE BEFORE: The Honble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN G.A.No.1412 of 2015 C.S.No.106 of 2015 ASSAM ROOFING LTD.& ANR. versus JSB CEMENT LLP & ANR. For the Petitioners : Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Jayanta Mitra, Ld. Adv.Gen., Ranjan Bachawat, Adv., Debnath Ghosh, Adv., Soumya Roy Chowdhury, Adv., Gautam Banerjee, Adv.For the Respondents : Mr.Pratap Chatterjee, Sr.Adv., Mr.S.Bose, Adv., Heard on : 29.04.2015, 13.05.2015, 14.05.2015, 08.06.2015, 15.06.2015, 09.09.2015, 21.09.2015, 23.09.2015, 28.09.2015, 30.09.2015, 01.10.2015, 08.10.2015, 13.10.2015, 16.11.2015, 18.11.2015, 23.11.2015. 02.12.2015 Judgment on : 9th December, 2015 Soumen Sen, J.:- The plaintiffs have filed the instant suit seeking reliefs on account of infringement of trademark, passing off and infringement of copyright. The case of the petitioners in short is stated hereinafter. The petitioner No.1 was incorporated in 1972 and is engaged in the business of manufacturing...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : 1977CriLJ1854
ORDERD.B. Lal, J.1. These are three criminal revision petitions presumably Under Section 13(4) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act (hereinafter to be referred as the 'Act') against the order of the J. M. F. C., Siddapur, issuing a distress warrant to the Deputy Commissioner, North Kanara, Karwar, to recover the amount as arrears of land revenue.2. Since a common question of law and fact arises, these three petitions can be disposed of by a single order.3. The uncontroverted facts are, that M/s. Vigneshwara Company is a registered partnership firm, and it is a dealer as such to pay the Sales Tax. The petitioners as well as some of the respondents are the partners of the firm. The Commercial Tax Officer passed an assessment order against the firm and the proceedings Under Section 13(3)(b) of the Act for recovery are being initiated against the partners of that firm, In view of Section 421 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for which a complaint was filed by the Commercial Tax Officer before a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d November, 2017 Pronounced on:04. h December, 2017 CS(COMM) 400/2017 LOTUS GREEN LLP ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.T.K.Ganju, Sr. Adv. with and Mukhi Mr.Ashish Ms.Madhurima Kapoor, Advs. versus RENOWNED BUILDTECH PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Defendant Through : Mr.Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Puja Dewan Seth and Uday Seth, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.IA No.6829/2017 & 8114/2017 1. This application (IA No.8114/2017) under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC is moved by the defendant for vacation of an interim order dated 30.05.2017 passed under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of the CPC (IA No.6829/2017) wherein the defendant was restrained from advertising, offering of service/sale, adopting, using and/or dealing in any manner with the plaintiffs registered trademarks/name Lotus and logo of the plaintiff or any other trade mark identical or deceptively similar to the CS(COMM) No.400/2017 1 of 21 plaintiffs above mentio...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C) 6569/2017 SHREE FLAVOURS LLP ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Kohli, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Mr. Kumal Bhari and Ms. Prerna Kohli, Advocates. versus GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC for R-1. Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocate for R-2 & 3. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH % Prathiba M. Singh, J.ORDER0109.2017 1. The powers of the Customs and Central Excise Settlement Commission (hereafter referred to as Settlement Commission) constituted under Section 32 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the CEA), to send the matter to the adjudicating authority by rejecting the application for settlement filed by the... Petitioner, are in question in the present case.2. The... Petitioner No.1 (the... Petitioner), Shree Flavours LLP, is a Limited Liability Partnership fir...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
G.S. Patel, J. 1.The petitioning-creditor, Tata Motors Ltd (previously Tata Finance Ltd; œTata Motors?) claims that an amount of Rs.16,14,515/- remains unpaid despite service of a statutory notice by the respondent company, Sundeep Polymers (P) Ltd. (œSundeep Polymers?) under an agreement dated 20th July 1988, by which Sundeep Polymers took a Mercedes Benz motor car on hirepurchase. 2.These are the facts. The parties entered into a hire purchase agreement on 20th July 1988. A copy is at Exhibit œB? to the petition. Sundeep Polymers took a Mercedes Benz motor car, registration number MH-01-V-5848, on hire purchase. Tata Motors was the owner. Sundeep Polymers was the hirer. It was required to pay monthly instalments to Tata Motors. The first of these was to be for Rs.1,32,020/- and the rest were to be of Rs.66,010/-. The aggregate amount payable was Rs.31,68,480/- over three years. Tata Motors claims that Sundeep Polymers was in breach of its contractual obligations. It...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
1. This is an action in copyright infringement and breach of confidentiality. The Plaintiff claims to hold the copyright in a concept note for a proposed television serial called Ye Tera Ghar Ye Mera Ghar?. It says that this was disclosed in circumstances of confidentiality to the 1st Defendant, Star India Private Limited. At the time when it was disclosed, or shortly thereafter, Star India said it was not interested in developing this concept. The Plaintiff says that it then took the script to another production house, Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited (Zee?). Even as the Plaintiff was working with Zee on the development of a serial based on the Plaintiff™s concept note, the Plaintiff was informed by the Programming Head of Zee saying that a promotional video had appeared on YouTube for a television show entitled Zindagi Abhi Baki Hai Mere Ghost? being made by Star India, and that this seemed to be too similar to the Plaintiff™s concept note to merit further work by Ze...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
1. This is an action in copyright infringement and breach of confidentiality. The Plaintiff claims to hold the copyright in a concept note for a proposed television serial called Ye Tera Ghar Ye Mera Ghar?. It says that this was disclosed in circumstances of confidentiality to the 1st Defendant, Star India Private Limited. At the time when it was disclosed, or shortly thereafter, Star India said it was not interested in developing this concept. The Plaintiff says that it then took the script to another production house, Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited (Zee?). Even as the Plaintiff was working with Zee on the development of a serial based on the Plaintiff™s concept note, the Plaintiff was informed by the Programming Head of Zee saying that a promotional video had appeared on YouTube for a television show entitled Zindagi Abhi Baki Hai Mere Ghost? being made by Star India, and that this seemed to be too similar to the Plaintiff™s concept note to merit further work by Ze...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE24H DAY OF JULY, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.2978 OF2024(AA) BETWEEN: M/S DEVTREE CORP. LLP. A LIMITED LIABILTY PARTNERSHIP A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, HAVING REGD. OFFICE AT1140 SECTOR -15B, SECTOR15CHANDIGARH16001 REPRESENTED BY MR. ANAND KULKARNI APPELLANT (BY SRI. UDAY HOLLA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. HIRAN KRISHNASWAMY, ADV.) AND: M/S BHUMIKA NORTH GARDENIA, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING OFFICE AT NO.435, BALAJI GOKULA, 4TH D MAIN, 12TH CROSS, WOC ROAD, MAHALAKSHMIPURA, B'LORE - 86 REP. BY R ASHWATHAPPA RESPONDENT (BY SRI. C.K.NANDA KUMAR, SENIOR COUNSEL A/W SRI. SUSHAL TIWARI, ADV. FOR C/RESPONDENT) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S371)(b) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996, PRAYING TO QUASH AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DT.15.04.2024 IN AA NO.15002/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE2V ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, SESSION J...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
#10 & 11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:20. 12.2018 W.P.(CRL) 3842/2018 RAHUL MODI UNION OF INDIA & ORS W.P.(CRL.) 3843/2018 MUKESH MODI versus versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aditya Singla, Mr. Pallav Gupta and Mr. Adit Pujari, Advocates in W.P.(CRL.) 3843/2018 Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Advocate with Ms. Supriya Juneja, Ms. Chestha Jetley and Mr. Krishna Multani, Advocates in W.P.(CRL) 3842/2018 For the... RESPONDENTS : Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC, Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC, Ms. Tejaswita Sachdeva, Mr. Viplav Acharya, Mr. Harshul Chaudhary, Advocates Mr. Saud Ahmed, Joint Director, SFIO, Mr. P.C. Maurya, Mr. Prashant Baliyan and Mr. Ajeet Shrivastava, SFIO Officers W.P.(CRL.) 3842/2018 & 3843/2018 Page 1 of 23 CORAM: HON'BLE MR...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE29H DAY OF AUGUST2023BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION No.40510 OF2017(LB-BMP) BETWEEN:1. JAMBO PLASTICS PVT. LTD., HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.11, 1ST CROSS, K.G. EXTN., OFF K.G. ROAD BANGALORE - 560 009 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MR. KIRAN KUMAR GADIA. REPRESENTED BY ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MERUSHIKHAR INFRA LLP, REPRESENTED BY ITS DESIGNATED PARTNER MR. KISHORE KUMAR.2. MERUSHIKHAR INFRA LLP A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP 'SOLUS', 11TH FLOOR, NO.2, 1ST CROSS, J.C. ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 027 REPRESENTED BY ITS DESIGNATED PARTNER MR. KISHORE KUMAR. PETITIONERS (BY SRI RAJESH CHANDER KUMAR ROHRA, SENIOR ADVOCATE A/W SMT. YOVINI RAJESH ROHRA, ADVOCATE FOR P1; SRI UDAYA HOLLA, SENIOR ADVOCATE A/W SRI MANU K., ADVOCATE FOR P2) RE-TYPED AND REPLACED VIDE CHAMBER ORDER DATED3108.2023. 2 AND:1. CHIEF QUALITY ASSURANCE ESTABLISHMENT (WARSHIP EQUIPMENT) MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (DGQA) JALAHALLI...
Tag this Judgment!