Lighting - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: lighting Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 344 results (0.063 seconds)Ge Apar Lighting Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-18-2001
Reported in: (2001)(75)ECC433
..... filed by the manufacturers claiming the credit that declaration has to be considered in the light of the record available with the central excise authorities 7 the appeal against the above ..... 1 this appeal is preferred by m s ge apar lighting pvt ltd against the order in appeal dt 16 4 94 as captioned above praying .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTU.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Banaras Electric Light and Power Co. ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-28-2001
Reported in: 2001VIIAD(SC)104; AIR2001SC2727; AIR2001SC3687; JT2001(6)SC501; JT2001(7)SC116; 2001(5)SCALE325; 2001(5)SCALE539; (2001)7SCC117; (2001)7SCC637; (2001)3UPLBEC2315; (2002)1UP
..... in the appeals relates to the validity of appointment of arbitrator by the banaras electric light and power company ltd for short the company respondent herein the high court of calcutta ..... agra electric supply co ltd ors air2000sc2422 and state of uttar pradesh v banaras electric light and power co ltd ors 2000 6scc488 2000 6scc488 in which this court placing reliance .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Light Metal Extrusion (P) Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Mar-09-2001
1 when the matter was called shri ranganath advocate appearing for the appellants submitted that issue relates to modvat credit...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Ge Lighting (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-10-2001
1 on hearing both sides on the stay application we find that the appeal itself could be taken up for...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNew Light Trading Co. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-04-2001
Reported in: (2001)170CTR(Del)138; [2002]256ITR391(Delhi); [2001]117TAXMAN741(Delhi)
arijit pasayat c j 1 at the instance of the assessed the following question has been referred for the opinion...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise, Vs. M/S. Om Glass Works, M/S. Advance
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2001
Reported in: (2001)(76)ECC89
..... is clear that optical properties responsible for generation of a concentrational beam of light exist in the head light covers the question for determination is whether such optical properties have arisen by ..... respondents therefore grinding of edges in order to smoothen the same and making the head light covers of the required size is totally different from the grinding required in optical working .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Commissioner of Central Vs. Gomukhi Charma Kendra and ors.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Mar-13-2001
Reported in: (2001)(76)ECC627
..... the brand name of another person therefore examining the issue in the light of the facts the tribunal had noted that the goods were ..... arise and the order is required to be reversed in the light of various other judgments in which the benefit of the notification ..... opinion that both the authorities have not examined the issue in the light of explanation to the notification the explanation ix amp x to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSharada Paint Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Oct-01-2001
..... have a very strong case for allowing their appeal in the light of the judgments already noted supra he submitted that sharada corporation ..... that both the authorities have not examined the issue in the light of explanation to the notification the explanation ix amp x ..... the impugned order and remand the case for reconsideration in the light of the above observations and also we direct the commissioner to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChandanben Chunilal Patel Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Oct-23-2001
Reported in: (2002)4GLR3502
..... the observations made in para 11 of the said judgment in light of the observations made by this court the petitioners have ..... having physical and actual possession of the subject land and in light of these facts according to the petitioners the present petition ..... of sec 4 the word abate if construed harmoniously in the light of the constitutional provisions would mean that the proceedings under the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRatna Paul and ors. Vs. Subhash Ranjan Paul and anr.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Feb-16-2001
Reported in: AIR2001Gau133
..... the respondent plaintiff himself having violated the permission for construction of building has obstructed free light and air to the appellants by constructing his four storied building and as such he ..... restraining construction of multistoried building on the plea that same will prevent from air and light unless there is clear proof of health hazard and environmental pollution 31 referring to the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial