Skip to content


Lighting - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: lighting Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 344 results (0.063 seconds)
Jan 18 2001 (TRI)

Ge Apar Lighting Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-18-2001

Reported in: (2001)(75)ECC433

..... filed by the manufacturers claiming the credit that declaration has to be considered in the light of the record available with the central excise authorities 7 the appeal against the above ..... 1 this appeal is preferred by m s ge apar lighting pvt ltd against the order in appeal dt 16 4 94 as captioned above praying .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 28 2001 (SC)

U.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Banaras Electric Light and Power Co. ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-28-2001

Reported in: 2001VIIAD(SC)104; AIR2001SC2727; AIR2001SC3687; JT2001(6)SC501; JT2001(7)SC116; 2001(5)SCALE325; 2001(5)SCALE539; (2001)7SCC117; (2001)7SCC637; (2001)3UPLBEC2315; (2002)1UP

..... in the appeals relates to the validity of appointment of arbitrator by the banaras electric light and power company ltd for short the company respondent herein the high court of calcutta ..... agra electric supply co ltd ors air2000sc2422 and state of uttar pradesh v banaras electric light and power co ltd ors 2000 6scc488 2000 6scc488 in which this court placing reliance .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 09 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Light Metal Extrusion (P) Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Mar-09-2001

1 when the matter was called shri ranganath advocate appearing for the appellants submitted that issue relates to modvat credit...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 10 2001 (TRI)

M/S Ge Lighting (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-10-2001

1 on hearing both sides on the stay application we find that the appeal itself could be taken up for...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 04 2001 (HC)

New Light Trading Co. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-04-2001

Reported in: (2001)170CTR(Del)138; [2002]256ITR391(Delhi); [2001]117TAXMAN741(Delhi)

arijit pasayat c j 1 at the instance of the assessed the following question has been referred for the opinion...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 12 2001 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. M/S. Om Glass Works, M/S. Advance

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Apr-12-2001

Reported in: (2001)(76)ECC89

..... is clear that optical properties responsible for generation of a concentrational beam of light exist in the head light covers the question for determination is whether such optical properties have arisen by ..... respondents therefore grinding of edges in order to smoothen the same and making the head light covers of the required size is totally different from the grinding required in optical working .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 13 2001 (TRI)

The Commissioner of Central Vs. Gomukhi Charma Kendra and ors.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Mar-13-2001

Reported in: (2001)(76)ECC627

..... the brand name of another person therefore examining the issue in the light of the facts the tribunal had noted that the goods were ..... arise and the order is required to be reversed in the light of various other judgments in which the benefit of the notification ..... opinion that both the authorities have not examined the issue in the light of explanation to the notification the explanation ix amp x to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 01 2001 (TRI)

Sharada Paint Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Oct-01-2001

..... have a very strong case for allowing their appeal in the light of the judgments already noted supra he submitted that sharada corporation ..... that both the authorities have not examined the issue in the light of explanation to the notification the explanation ix amp x ..... the impugned order and remand the case for reconsideration in the light of the above observations and also we direct the commissioner to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 23 2001 (HC)

Chandanben Chunilal Patel Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Oct-23-2001

Reported in: (2002)4GLR3502

..... the observations made in para 11 of the said judgment in light of the observations made by this court the petitioners have ..... having physical and actual possession of the subject land and in light of these facts according to the petitioners the present petition ..... of sec 4 the word abate if construed harmoniously in the light of the constitutional provisions would mean that the proceedings under the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 16 2001 (HC)

Ratna Paul and ors. Vs. Subhash Ranjan Paul and anr.

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Feb-16-2001

Reported in: AIR2001Gau133

..... the respondent plaintiff himself having violated the permission for construction of building has obstructed free light and air to the appellants by constructing his four storied building and as such he ..... restraining construction of multistoried building on the plea that same will prevent from air and light unless there is clear proof of health hazard and environmental pollution 31 referring to the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //