Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
Decided on : Sep-06-2010
..... said decision has been followed by the apex court in krantikari suraksha rakshak sanghatana vs. bharat sanchar nigam ltd.& ors. 2009 air scw 317; parimal chandra raha and others vs. life insurance corporation of india and others air 1995 sc 1666; gujrat electricity board, thermal power station, ukai vs. hind mazdoor sabha and others air 1995 sc 1893; secretary, haryana state electricity vs ..... of mines manager on all women employees, more than 1500 in number.provision of section 48 of mines act, 1952 has also been referred to by the union which provides for registers of persons employed, other details, nature of employment, and their was prohibition under sub-section 43(3) of section 48 carving out that no person shall be employed in a mine until the ..... labour, said agreement was applicable for regular employees of sail. the contract labours were not party to the agreement. section 29 of the id act provides for consequence of breach of any settlement. settlement does not spell out any crystallization of right in favour of contract labours in the event of its disregard. the decision in air india statutory corporation and others vs. united ..... type of industry, the local conditions and the like, may be resorted to when labour legislation casts welfare obligations on the real employer, based on arts, 38-39- 42,43 and 43-a of the constitution. the court must be astute to avoid the mischief and achieve the purpose of the law and not be misled by the maya of legal appearances .....
Tag this Judgment!