Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
..... , fairness and reasonableness and non-arbitrary. if it is not so it cannot be just. [see helen c. rebello v. maharashtra state road transport corporation (air 1998 sc 3191) : 1998(4) rcr(civil) 177 (sc)]. "5. in new india assurance co. ltd. v. satender ; ( ..... and the delay was beyond the control of the appellant. though an objection has been raised on behalf of the respondent/insurance company who has entered appearance after notice; however, keeping in view the reasons contained in the application and the fact ..... . in contrast, non-pecuniary damages include such immeasurable elements as pain and suffering and loss of amenity and enjoyment of life. in this context, it becomes duty of the court to award just compensation for non-pecuniary loss. as already noted ..... well as the high court has awarded the compensation on the basis of the second schedule and relevant multiplier under the act. however, we may notice here that as far as non-pecuniary damages are concerned, the tribunal does not award any .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
..... , fairness and reasonableness and non-arbitrary. if it is not so it cannot be just. [see helen c. rebello v. maharashtra state road transport corporation (air 1998 sc 3191) : 1998(4) rcr(civil) 177 (sc)]. "5. in new india assurance co. ltd. v. satender ; ( ..... the delay was beyond the control of the appellant. though an objection has been raised on behalf of the respondent/insurance company who has entered appearance after notice; however, keeping in view the reasons contained in the application and the fact ..... . in contrast, non-pecuniary damages include such immeasurable elements as pain and suffering and loss of amenity and enjoyment of life. in this context, it becomes duty of the court to award just compensation for non-pecuniary loss. as already noted ..... well as the high court has awarded the compensation on the basis of the second schedule and relevant multiplier under the act. however, we may notice here that as far as non-pecuniary damages are concerned, the tribunal does not award any .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur
..... followed by the apex court in krantikari suraksha rakshak sanghatana vs. bharat sanchar nigam ltd.& ors. 2009 air scw 317; parimal chandra raha and others vs. life insurance corporation of india and others air 1995 sc 1666; gujrat electricity board, thermal power station, ukai vs. hind mazdoor sabha and others air 1995 sc 1893; secretary ..... technicalqualifications."the apex court has laid down that there is no automatic absorption on issuance of prohibition notification under section 10 of clra act. the decision in air india statutory corporation and others vs. united labour union and others (supra) has been over ruled with certain savings of the action taken under the ..... mines manager employed by the management. cgit has also observed in para 45 that sail management used to discharge statutory liability as envisaged in clra act, mines act and other labour laws. when we consider the various statutory provisions under which the labours used to work in the mines, the mines vocational training .....
Tag this Judgment!