Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: life insurance corporation act 1956 section 43 application of the insurance act Sorted by: old Year: 1973 Page 1 of about 53 results (0.091 seconds)

Sirsi Municipality by Its President Sirsi Vs. Cecelia Kom Francis Tell ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC855; [1973(26)FLR150]; (1973)ILLJ226SC; (1973)1SCC409; [1973]3SCR348; 1973(1)SLJ525(SC)

..... corporation case (supra) regulations framed under section 45 of the act were said by this court to be terms and conditions of service but the same did not constitute a statutory restriction as to the kind of contracts which the corporation could make with the servants or he ground on which it could terminate. the dismissal in that case was found to be wrongful and not to fall within the vice of infraction of statutory limitation or statutory obligation.24. this court in s. r. tewari v. district board agra : (1964)illj1sc , life insurance corporation ..... judgment against the order of dismissal or termination.21. in tyagi's case (supra) the warehousing corporation was competent to make regulations not inconsistent with the agricultural produce (development and warehousing) corporation act, 1956. the warehousing corporation framed regulations. regulation 11 dealt with termination of the service of an employee other than ..... statute which regulate the exercise of their power is invalid or ultra vires and the principle of pure master and servant contractual relationship has no application to such cases.25. in tewari's case (supra) this court said that dismissal, removal or reduction of an officer or servant might be effected ..... can be imposed either by a rule made in exercise of a statutory power or it may arise by implication when exercising a quasi-judicial functions.43. even when there was no specific rule on the subject, like rule 143 in the case before us, this court has held that .....

Vaish College (Society) Shamli and ors. Vs. Sri Lakshmi NaraIn and ors ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1974All1b

..... restriction as to the kind of contract which it can make with its servants or the grounds on which it can dismiss them.109. in the case of life insurance corporation of india v. mukherjee : (1964)illj442sc the supreme court held that section 11(2) of the life insurance corporation act, 1956 was paramount and would override any provisions of the order passed by the central government if it was contrary to it. next would come the order and lastly the regulations ..... first two cases referred, that is of the principal of the vaish college and the teacher of dayanand college a claim has been made that the termination of their respective services by the management of the colleges concerned was in violation of the provisions of the acts and the statutes applicable to the university to which the colleges were affiliated. on the relevant dates when the termination orders were passed by the management of the respective colleges they stood affiliated to the meerut university. in the case of 1969 all lj 612 a division ..... the terms and conditions of the contract.42. to sum up this part of the case it is clear that section 25-c (2) of the agra act, (parallel section 28 (3) of the meerut act) and the statute 30 of chapter xviii of the agra university act are proprio vigore enforceable and any breach of any terms thereof will be breach of statute and not a breach of contract.43. the next important question that remains to be considered is the nature and status of the committee of management or the .....

The Mayor Vs. Ray

Court : US Supreme Court

The Mayor v. Ray - 86 U.S. 468 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court The Mayor v. Ray, 86 U.S. 19 Wall. 468 468 (1973) The Mayor v. Ray 86 U.S. (19 Wall.) 468 ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE Syllabus A city corporation the charter of which gave to it the usual powers formerly given to such corporations but which did not give to it the power to borrow money, being and for some time having been pecuniarily embarrassed, issued its checks, in form negotiable and drawn by the mayor and recorder of the city on the city treasurer. The checks were presented to the city treasurer and by him endorsed with his name and the date of his endorsement, it being the practice of that officer, in the then embarrassments of the city, thus to endorse checks when the city was not in funds to pay them, in order that the checks might thereafter draw interest, as it was understood that they would do. The checks were then taken by the holder, and, according to a then prevalent custo...

Hughes Tool Co. Vs. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

Hughes Tool Co. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. - 409 U.S. 363 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court Hughes Tool Co. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 409 U.S. 363 (1973) Hughes Tool Co. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. No. 71-827 Argued October 10, 1972 Decided January 10, 1973 * 409 U.S. 363 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Syllabus Trans World Airlines (TWA) brought this antitrust action against the Hughes Tool Co. (Toolco) and others for treble damages as a result of the manner in which Toolco had exercised its controlling interest in TWA, with particular reference to Toolco's asserted acts to control and dictate the acquisition and financing of aircraft by TWA. As an organization engaged in phases of aeronautics, Toolco could not acquire control of an air carrier such as TWA without consent of the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB). In 1944, the CAB approved de facto control of TWA by Toolco as comporting with the provisions of 408 of the Federal Avia...

R. Kapanipathi Rao and anr. Vs. M.S. Meyyappan and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1974Mad57

Raghavan, J.1. The defendants are the appellants. 2. The suit is for recovery of possession of the 'Hotel Oceanic' and its annexe 'Ratnagar' more fully described in Schedules 1 and 2 to the plaint, for recovery of Rupees 22,500/- as and for mesne profits for the period commencing from 12-7-1969 to 26-8-1969 (date of suit) and for future mesne profits at the rate of Rs. 15,000/- per month. The first plaintiff is the son of late M. S. Ramaswami Chettiar and the second plaintiff is the wife of the said Ramaswami Chettiar. The said Ramaswami Chettiar was the owner of the building 'Hotel Oceanic' and his wife, the second plaintiff, is the owner of 'Ratnagar' an annexe of Hotel Oceanic, at Madras. The said Ramaswami Chettiar was himself running a residential high class Hotel and Restaurant in the said Hotel Oceanic and its annexe Ratnagar which were fully furnished with fittings, furniture and equipment ever since the completion of its construction in or about 1954. In or about July, 1959, t...

Subash Chander and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1974P& H54

1. Fourteen appeals F. A. O. Nos. 67, 68, 69, 76, 87, 89, 99, 91, 101, 102, 103, 104 and 105 of 1971 have been filed against an award dated 4-1-1971 of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rohtak. By the said award, the learned Tribunal had disposed of five claim applications arising out of the same motor accident under Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. The reasons which had led the Tribunal to consolidate proceedings in these five cases and to dispose them of by one judgment would enable me to hear and dispose of all these fourteen appeals together.2. The undisputed facts are that on the morning of 17-6-1968. Haryana Government Roadways Bus No. HRA-1246 and Jeep No. PNC-1557 happened to be travelling in opposite directions on Kaithal Narwana road. At about 9 A. M. the bus started from the Bus stand at village Kalayat and had gone hardly a furlong or two when the two vehicles collided on or near a road culvert. The jeep could make hardly a dent in the bus which had a full c...

C. Lyall and Company Vs. B. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1973Delhi905

H.L. Anand, J. (1) This order will dispose of issue No. 1 which was ordered to be tried as a preliminary issue. The issue is in the following terms:- 'WHETHERthe objections are within time? If so, is the objector entitled to condensation of delay '?'It is obvious that there is a typographical error in the phraseology of the issue because on the issue, as at present worded, if the objections are within time, the question as to the objector's entitlement to condensation of delay would not survive. It further appears that the issue was intended to be: whether the objections are within time and if not, is the objector entitled to condensation of delay. I, thereforee, reframe the aforesaid issue as follows :- 'WHETHERthe objections are within time? If not, is tile objector entitled to condensation of delay?'The issue has arisen in the following circumstances: (2) The petitioner is a partnership firm and claim to have executed the work of strengthening of existing runway and construction of ...

The Industrial Finance Corporation of India Vs. Delhi Administration a ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1973(27)FLR207]; ILR1973Delhi29; 1974LabIC223

..... article 311, and the reference to article 12 was made only to distinguish the decision of the supreme court in the case of rajasthan state electricity board (supra). (43) in pramodrai shamaldas bhavsar v. life insurance corporation of india, : air1969bom337 , (28) the question arose as to whether the life insurance corporation was an 'authority' within the meaning of article 12 of the constitution. it was pointed out that the life insurance corporation is a statutory corporate body created under the life insurance act, 1956, and that a perusal of the provisions of the act shows clearly that the activity of the corporation is only business activity and it possesses no power which in any manner can be exercised to affect the activities of other citizens ..... of managing agents under the companies act, 1956, and the application of the provisions of the companies act to an industrial concern whose management has been taken over by the corporation. it may be noted that sections 28 and 30a to 30e only make the corporation a kind of preferred corporation in the matter of realization of its dues as compared with other companies incorporated under the companies act. the powers or functions of the corporation under the said sections are not, in our opinion, governmental powers or functions. shri jitendra sharma contended that the provisions in section 30a to 30e of the industrial finance corporation act, are similar to the provisions in section 18a to 18f of the industries (development .....

Calcutta Electric Supply Corporation Ltd. and anr. Vs. Ramratan Mahato

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1973Cal258,(1973)77CALLT367(HC),(1974)IILLJ106Cal

Salil Kumar Datta, J.1. This is an appeal by the defendants against a judgment of reversal. The plaintiff instituted the suit on the following allegations : The plaintiff worked for several years temporarily under the Calcutta Electric Supply Corporation Ltd., the defendant No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the Company) at its Regional Office at premises No. 433/1, G. T. Road (North). Howrah as vendor, cleaner and plate washer in places of absent and leave-enjoying bearers. He was appointed by the company in that post on February 1, 1968 and after unspotted and continuous service for six months became automatically permanent in his post from August 1, 1968. The Revenue Officer of the said office, the defendant No. 2 by a verbal order passed on November 12, 1968 discontinued the plaintiff's service without assigning any reason or following legal procedure. The plaintiff in the circumstances, instituted this suit on November 13, 1968 praying for a declaration that (i) the verbal order of...

Agents and Manufacfurers, Delhi Vs. the Employees State Insurance Corp ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 9(1973)DLT500; [1974(28)FLR27]; 1974LabIC220; (1973)IILLJ447Del

R.N. Aggarwal, J. (1) This judgment will dispose of F. A, 0. Nos. 27, 28 and 29 of 1971 sines they involve common questions of law and fact. The appellant (M/s. Agents and Manufacturers a partnership firm) is carrying on the business of manufacturing wooden furniture, that is, base and cover of sewing machines. The firm is carrying on the above business in three separate premises-No. 508 Circular Road, Shahdara, 525/16 Chhota Bazar. Shahdara and 131 Chhota Bazar, Shahdara. In the first two premises, the wooden base and cover of the sewing machines are manufactured with the aid of power. At premises No. 131. the manufactured goods are polished, finshed, packed and sold. There is no power at the last named premises. It is not disputed that the above three units are managed by the appellant. The Employees State Insurance Corporation found that the manufacturing business carried on by the appellant is covered by (2) The appellant contended before the Employees' Insurance Court that the wor...