Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: life insurance corporation act 1956 chapter 7 miscellaneous Page 97 of about 29,890 results (0.453 seconds)

Techno Metal India (P.) Ltd. Vs. Prem Nath Anand

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1973]43CompCas556(Cal),77CWN957

..... with the question as to whether the limitation act would govern applications to the labour court. an obiter dictum of the supreme court is binding on all other courts. but is it a case of obiter subsequently, in nityanand m. joshi v. life insurance corporation of india, : (1969)iillj711sc the court ..... held that one of the grounds on which the above decision was founded was the interpretation of article 137. it was however observed :'..... that it may require serious consideration whether applications to courts under other provisions, apart from the civil procedure code, are included within article 137 of the limitation act ..... such an application. in this connection, reference may be made to the case of karnatak vegetable oils and refineries ltd. v. madras industrial investment corporation ltd., : air1955mad582 reference may also be made to two decisions of learned single judges of our court in in the matter of india electric .....

Perfect Industrial Agencies Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Commercial Tax Offi ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1999(2)MPLJ632

..... authorities clothed with that law are long enough to reach the factum behind the facade. if it were not so the business morality would be a casualty.10. in life insurance corporation of india v. escorts limited, air 1986 sc 1370 the supreme court has held that generally and broadly speaking, it may be said that the ..... a company is a juristic entity and it is distinct from its directors and shareholders. it is an abstraction of the law. its corporate personality receives legal recognition. after its incorporation under section 34 of the companies act, 1956 it has a separate legal existence and the law recognises it as a legal person separate and distinct from its members. ..... of the business of the old company has been 'entirely transferred' to the petitioner no. 1 within the meaning of section 33 of the m. p. general sales tax act, 1958. the broad circumstances which have been relied upon for this finding are (a) shri navdeep singh khera was the director of the old company and he is also the .....

T.M.A. Pai Foundation and ors. Etc.Etc. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2003(51)BLJR580; JT2002(9)SC486; (2002)8SCC481a; (2002)3UPLBEC2961

..... provision may be special in one aspect and general in other aspect.42. in the life insurance corporation of india v. d.j. bahadur and ors. : (1981)illj1sc , krishna iyer, j. speaking for a three-judge bench observed:'for certain purposes, an act may be general and for certain other purposes it may be special and we cannot ..... empty formality unless education imparted in such institutions yields fruitful results by enabling the students/trainees of such institutions to join the mainstream and to settle in life whether by pursuing higher studies or seeking employment or otherwise. in the system prevalent in almost all countries, the state or universities prescribe syllabi in different ..... blur distinctions when dealing with finer points of law. in law, we have a cosmos of relativity not absolutes - so too in life.'this was approved by a constitution bench of this .....

Maneck Noshirwan Kaka and ors. Vs. Official Liquidator, High Court

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1986]60CompCas526(Cal)

..... . k. sen j. dismissing the application of the appellants under sections 446 and 466 of the companies act 1956.2. the building being premises no. 12, chowringhee road and no. 1 chowringhee palace, calcutta, admittedly belongs to the life insurance corporation of india, hereinafter referred to as ' the lic '. the said building was in possession of the ..... 1, maneck noshirwan kaka, claims to be the authorised representative of appellants nos. 2 and 3, who are contributories as defined under section 428 of the companies act, 1956, in respect of the company. it has been alleged that appellants nos. 2 and 3 transferred for valuable consideration 10 preference shares and 1,000 ..... on behalf of the appellants to consider the effect of the two notifications, one under section 3 and the other under section 4 of the relief undertakings act, on the winding-up proceeding, in particular, on the disclaimer. it is not disputed that if the disclaimer had become operative before the said notifications were .....

Cooke and Kelvey Properties Private Ltd. Vs. United Bank of India

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1989)2CALLT143(HC)

..... attracts to this case and the defendant is liable to be evicted under section 13(1)(a) of the west bengal premises tenancy act, 1956. in support mr. bachawat has referred to several decisions, namely, j. mc. gaffin v. life insurance corporation, 81 calcutta weekly notes page 629. central calcutta v. hoshang (1976) 1 cal lj page 500, probhabati v. r. ..... frequent and persistent; (vi) it is not normally expected in the house-hold; (v) and that it is not possible for the neighbours to lead a normal life. it is significant to note that the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff is so meagre that it cannot be held that any of these tests has been ..... the defendant or the alleged union made any additions and alterations in the premises. it is also denied that the defendant or the alleged union as committing the act of nuisance or annoyance to the neighbours including the plaintiff. the plaintiff's claim of reasonable requirement of the suit premises on the ground of reasonable requirement has .....

Krishan Kumar Agarwala Vs. Reserve Bank of India and Others

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1991Cal272,94CWN919

..... as annexure 'l' and annexure 'm', the learned advocate-general has placed strongest possible reliance on the five-judge unanimous decision of the supreme court in life insurance corporation v. escorts ltd., : 1986(8)ecc189 and has urged that the decision in an irresistible authority for the view that once permission of the reserve bank ..... of india hasbeen obtained under the foreign exchange regulation act, 1973, whether before or after the purchase, the company cannot, thereafter, refuse to register the transfer of shares, 'nor is it open to the company ..... the matter with admirable dexterity.4. mr. pal has firstly urged that clause (3) itself, inserted by way of substitution by the constitution (forty-fourth amendment) act, 1978, is ultra vires the amending powers of parliament under article 368 of the constitution, as by the provisions of clause (3), one of the basic features .....

Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (U ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1991]71CompCas300(Cal),93CWN134

..... subscribers. care must also be taken to protect the thousands of employees. we must also record our dissatisfaction with some of the schemes of the life insurance corporation which appear to us to be even less advantageous to subscribers than the peerless scheme. we suggest that there should be a complete ban on forfeiture ..... schemes, particularly financial schemes, as those run by the petitioner-company for preventing exploitation of ignorant subscribers. in my view, section 408 of the companies act could not be invoked either for regulating the schemes or for doing anything to prevent exploitation of ignorant subscribers. when there is a special statute conferring ..... of financial institutions like that of the petitioner-company by issuing directions necessary for the purpose, had considered the matter and permitted that petitioner-company to act in a particular manner.22. in the instant case, the supreme court of india, in the said judgment, had occasion to make such observations indicating .....

Supreme Court Bar Association and ors. Vs. B.D. Kaushik.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... notice of the board meeting and in the absence thereof, any decision taken in connection with such special business would be invalid. a similar view had earlier been expressed in life insurance corporation of india vs. escorts ltd. & ors. [(1986) 1 scc 264].23. mr. desai submitted that even mr. dinesh dwivedi and mr. s.p. singh, learned ..... p. singh, that the rights of the practising lawyers in the supreme court to form an association had been curtailed or that the provisions of the societies registration act were being violated by the implementation committee, none of the aforesaid rights of the members of the scba had been curtailed in any manner. mr. ranjit kumar ..... the judgment delivered in b.d. kaushik's case (supra); ore) that anybody's resignation should be accepted.22. referring to section 173(2) of the companies act, 1956, mr. desai contended that as had been repeatedly held by this court, at any extraordinary general meeting, along with a notice of the meeting, a statement setting .....

Asoka Ghose and ors. Vs. the Official Liquidator of Remington Rand of ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2003)3CALLT608(HC),[2004]121CompCas229(Cal),[2004]51SCL572(Cal)

..... objections taken on behalf of the icici bank in their affidavit affirmed by their assistant general manager it is stated that icici and uti along with life insurance corporation of india have initiated proceedings against the respondent company before the learned debt recovery tribunal for recovery of their debts and a receiver has been appointed ..... of the companiesact, the official liquidator shall, by virtue of his office, become the liquidatorof the company. 30. in terms of section 451 of the act, the liquidator shall conduct the proceedings in winding up the company and perform such duties in reference thereto as the court may impose. the powers of liquidator ..... if the property is notionally disclaimed by the official liquidator passed the following order;'in my view, since the official liquidator has already been discharged from acting, question of order of physical disclaimer does not arise. however, since the property in question does not belong to the company in liquidation and the .....

Smt. Padmabati Debi Vs. Chittaranjan Dasgupta and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2005)3CALLT516(HC)

..... of s.a. vengadamma and ors. v. jitendra p. vora and anr., reported in : (1997)11scc334 as well as in the case of bharat sales ltd. v. life insurance corporation of india reported in : [1998]1scr711 , this court holds that the defendant no. 1 failed to discharge his duty by not proving that there was no subletting in spite ..... of a decree for eviction against him by a court of competent jurisdiction. as such determination of relationship between the parties by notice is not contemplated under the said act. as such termination of tenancy by notice is not a precondition for filing a suit.41. accordingly, this court is unable to hold that the service of the ..... upon the defendant no. l determining his tenancy.24. according to mr. mukherjee since no specific mode is prescribed for effecting such service under the west bengal premises tenancy act, the service which has been effected upon the defendant no. 1 at the address of the suit premises, cannot be held to be illegal.25. mr. mukherjee further .....