Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: life insurance corporation act 1956 chapter 7 miscellaneous Page 100 of about 29,890 results (0.281 seconds)

C. Damodarasamy Vs. Government of India Rep. by Its Secretary, Ministr ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2003(97)FLR655]; (2003)IILLJ469Mad

..... -regulation (2) or sub-regulation (3) of regulation 19 of the life insurance corporation of india (staff) regulations, 1960 and rule 14 of the life insurance corporation of india class iii and class iv employees (revision of terms and conditions of service) rules, 1985 made under the act; (ii) voluntary retirement in accordance with the provisions contained in rule 31 ..... pension the petitioner is suffering and he has no means to live. hence, the present writ petition.ii. respondent's case :7. in terms of the life insurance corporation of india (staff) regulations, 1960, as amended up to 31.12.1983. rule 6 provides for termination of service of employee in certain cases after giving ..... prays for the issue of a writ of declaration that the cut off date of 1.11.93 prescribed in the proviso to rule 33 of the life insurance corporation of india (employees) pension rules, 1995, read with order dated 27.11.95 issued by the 3rd respondent are illegal and unconstitutional and, consequently, direct .....

Commissioner of Income-tax, U. P. Vs. Neekelal Jainarain.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1966]61ITR704(All)

..... considered the liability imposed by a statute upon a person which is distinct from the chargeability imposed by section 4 of the excess profits tax act upon a business. in neptune assurance co. ltd. v. life insurance corporation the supreme court said at page 149 :'it is well established that under the income-tax law the liability to be charged to tax.... ..... the funds from the insurance commissioners. the liability on the part of the committee to pay money to him accrued and the fact that the sum to which he was entitled out of the ..... exact amount payable to him had not been ascertained. under the contract dr. sweeny became entitled to his share in the funds received by the committee from the insurance commissioners in accordance with the scale of fees as soon as he performed his part of the contract by doing the work for the committee and the committee received .....

Bhag Chand Panju Ram and anr. Vs. Smt. Snehlata and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1974WLN36

..... the suppression of the fact of he accident which had already taken place and of the existence of insurance with the life insurance corporation of india in respect of the bus in question for the same period, were fraudulent and malafide acts on the part of the owner of the bus and further that on coming to know of these ..... the respondents.50. we would now proceed to consider the other appeal filed by the life insurance corporation of india the first submission made on behalf of the corporation, namely, that in view of section 95(2)(6) of the motor vehicles act the liability of the insurer is limited to the extent of rs. 20,000/- is well founded. section ..... the provisions of section 95 of the motor vehicles act and secondly that the vehicle no. rjr 915 was also insured with the indian mercantile insurance co., ltd., and as such even the amount of rs. 20,000/- should be shared equally by the said company along with the appellant, life insurance corporation of india.9. let us examine the first .....

V.J. Acharya Vs. Ratilal Fulchand Shah and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1(1985)ACC186

..... . dr. acharya was proceeding from gamdevi to british council library on the morning of 18-1-1969 when his car mrc 7456 failed and got stalled just beyond the life insurance corporation building near traffic control department. acharya pushed the car near the curb, made unsuccessful attempts to start the same and finally after locking the car went to kaypee garage ..... an independent contractor, over whose manner of working acharya had no control. in this view of the matter there appears to be no case made out that salim was acting as an agent of acharya. as the link of master and servant or principal and agent has not been established in the case of acharya and salim, acharya cannot ..... should answer for it. if an agent deceives another by his fraud his principal should make good the loss, it does not matter whether the servant or agent is acting for the benefit of his master or principal or not. suffice it that the master or principal has put him in a position where he may do injury to .....

Kuldeep Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1974WLN176

..... adopted by a division bench of the andbra pradesh high court in akella satyanirayan murthy v. zonal manager, life insurance corporation of india : air1969ap371 , where the petitioner, a development officer in the life insurance corporation of india, was found guilty under section 409 of the indian penal code (criminal breach of trust) ..... certain laws where conviction is a disqualification. reference may be made to section 8 of the representation of the people act; section 26 rajasthan municipalities act; section 11 rajasthan panchayat act etc. section 12 has the effect of neutralising the disqualification attached to a conviction.13. leraned counsel argued that ..... process of consideration has within its ambit an examination of circumstances with objectivity rather than a mere subjective occlusion. essentially it implies the duty to act judicially. in the black's law dictionary, fourth edition, at page 378 consideration has been assigned the following meaning:a technical term indicating that .....

Reserve Bank of India Vs. Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1987(1)SCALE100; (1987)1SCC424; [1987]2SCR1; 1987(1)LC586(SC)

..... tandem supported the reserve bank of india against the peerless. when the activities of the peerless and the life insurance corporation are considered juxtaposed, one is tempted to observe that peerless is less harsh than the life insurance corporation. the life insurance corporation enjoys many privileges. it has a duty to be above suspicion. it has a duty to serve people ..... of any goods to a hirer under a hire-purchase agreement as defined in clause (c) of section 2 of the hire-purchase act, 1972; (iv) the carrying on of any class of insurance business; (v) managing, conducting or supervising, as foreman, agent or in any other capacity, of chits or curies as defined ..... various states. these companies float schemes for collecting money from the public and the modus operandi of such schemes is generally as described below:the company acts as the foreman or promoter and collects subscriptions in one lump sum or by monthly instalments spread over a specified period from the subscribers to the .....

Jai Ganesh SRA CHS (Prop.) and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ot ...

Court : Mumbai

..... . (iii) ashoka marketing ltd. and anr. vs. punjab natiional bank and ors., air 1991 sc 855. (iv) cantonment board, mhow and anr. vs. m.p. state road transport corporation, (1997) 9 scc 450. (v) life insurance corporation of india vs. d.j. bahadur and ors., air 1980 sc 2181. (vi) ethiopian airlines vs. ganesh narain saboo, (2011) 8 scc 539. (vii) krishi upaj mandi ..... provision for the improvement and clearance of slum areas in the state and their redevelopment and for the protection of occupiers from eviction and distress warrants. chapter i of this act contains preliminary provisions including definitions. some of the definitions are important. the words and expressions such as "building", "land", "occupier", "owner", "eligible slum dweller", "slum area", "slum", "clearance", "slum rehabilitation .....

Union of India, represented by its Secretary, to the Government of Ind ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... then section 108 of the evidence act takes over and all consequences would follow. in other words, presumption of death was held to supersede the finding of desertion. 19. the aforesaid view was reiterated by the division bench of the bombay high court in smt. bhanumati dayaram mhatre v. life insurance corporation of india, air 2008 bombay 196, ..... date of death. 26. after pointing out the distinction between sections 107 and 108 of the evidence act, the division bench of the madras high court then took up for consideration in the managing director, state express transport corporation tamil nadu limited vs. e.tamilarasi, the next question as to what exactly could be taken ..... of the madras high court disagreed with the said view, in the managing director, state express transport corporation tamil nadu limited vs. e.tamilarasi (2016 (1) ctc 698). the distinction between sections 107 and 108 of the evidence act were brought out in the said decision of the division bench, to which one of us (vrs .....

Siddaramappa and ors. Vs. Smt. Gouravva

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2004Kant230; ILR2004KAR3611

..... schedule property. they contended though plaintiff is the lawfully wedded wife of basavannappa she was not on cordial terms with him, she did not lead a married life and basavannappa lived at bidarahali village with his keep mistress and died there only in his sister's house. plaintiff is not the heir and has not ..... once a wife is disinherited a suspicious circumstance do exist and in the absence of proper explanation being given explaining the said suspicious circumstance it cannot be acted upon. he submits the material on record does not show any cause for disinheriting the plaintiff. the contention of the other side that they were not on ..... to approach the court below for the relief of declaration, for cancellation of the adoption deed and for cancelling the illegal entries made by the revenue authorities acting on the adoption and the alleged will and she also prayed for restraining the defendants from obstructing the peaceful enjoyment of the plaintiff over the suit schedule ' .....

Shyama Bai Widow of Late Mulayam Chand JaIn Vs. Murlidhar S/O Late Dr. ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(4)MPHT123

..... year 1971-72 with one sumer chand jain who is a lecturer in government school. it has also been pleaded that said smt. kanta jain is an agent of life insurance corporation as well as of the post office and she is not a member of the family of applicant nor she is dependent on her. according to the respondent, ..... was a retired servant of government aided institution and, therefore, he was not found to be landlord of special category, as defined in section 23-j of the act and, therefore, this decision is also not applicable.24. the rent controlling authority by rejecting the application has totally deviated from the well settled principles of law which ..... eviction of respondent from the suit accommodation which is non-residential on the ground of her bona fide need as envisaged under section 23-a(b) of the act.3. the application for eviction was filed by applicant-shyama bai against her tenant shobhraj ahuja who died during the pendency of the application before the rent controlling .....