Liberalization - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: liberalization Year: 1969 Page 1 of about 208 results (0.013 seconds)Sri Digyadarsan Rajendra Ramdassjivaru Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-26-1969
Reported in: AIR1970SC181; (1969)1SCC844; [1970]1SCR103
..... court is bound to respect legislative intention and not to extend limitation period by giving liberal interpretation basic rules determination of lelgislative intent held court is bound to respect legislative ..... intention and not to extend limitation period by giving liberal interpretation an appeal to the letters patent bench failed g violates any of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSambudamurthi Mudaliar Vs. the State of Madras and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-15-1969
Reported in: AIR1971SC2363; (1970)1SCC4; [1970]2SCR424
..... court is bound to respect legislative intention and not to extend limitation period by giving liberal interpretation basic rules determination of lelgislative intent held court is bound to respect legislative ..... intention and not to extend limitation period by giving liberal interpretation 12 it is now well established that the office of a hereditary trustee .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHindustan Steel Ltd. Vs. Messrs Dilip Construction Company
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-18-1969
Reported in: 1969(17)BLJR1074; 1970MhLJ110(SC); (1969)1SCC597; [1969]3SCR736
..... court is bound to respect legislative intention and not to extend limitation period by giving liberal interpretation basic rules determination of lelgislative intent held court is bound to respect legislative intention ..... and not to extend limitation period by giving liberal interpretation 1 when the duty and penalty if any leviable in respect of any .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State of U.P. Vs. Kanwar Durgeshwar Dayal
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-11-1969
Reported in: 1969(2)LC324(SC)
..... determination of compensation held legislation being a beneficent one the provisions thereof should be interpreted liberally however it does not contemplate injust enrichment section 168 s b sinha cyriac joseph jj .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmarjit Singh Sohan Singh Vs. the State
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-17-1969
Reported in: AIR1970P& H279; 1970CriLJ835
..... of judgment in section 2 9 of c p c is much wider and more liberal intermediary or interlocutory judgment fall in the category of orders referred to clause a to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBega and ors. Vs. Shadi and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-21-1969
Reported in: AIR1970P& H298
..... of judgment in section 2 9 of c p c is much wider and more liberal intermediary or interlocutory judgment fall in the category of orders referred to clause a to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRadha Kishan Harbans Lal, Printing and Finishing Mills Vs. Union of In ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-15-1969
Reported in: AIR1969P& H363
..... of judgment in section 2 9 of c p c is much wider and more liberal intermediary or interlocutory judgment fall in the category of orders referred to clause a to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRam Kanwar and anr. Vs. the State
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-28-1969
Reported in: AIR1970P& H301; 1970CriLJ982
..... of judgment in section 2 9 of c p c is much wider and more liberal intermediary or interlocutory judgment fall in the category of orders referred to clause a to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Assessing Authority, Amritsar and anr. Vs. Om Parkash Seth
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-22-1969
Reported in: AIR1970P& H239; [1969]24STC282(P& H)
..... of judgment in section 2 9 of c p c is much wider and more liberal intermediary or interlocutory judgment fall in the category of orders referred to clause a to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFateh Singh Chugha Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-31-1969
Reported in: AIR1970P& H315
..... of judgment in section 2 9 of c p c is much wider and more liberal intermediary or interlocutory judgment fall in the category of orders referred to clause a to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial