Libeler - Judgment Search Results

Mcintyre Vs. Ohio Elections Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 3599 09 a is intended to identify persons who distribute campaign materials containing fraud libel or false advertising and to provide voters with a mechanism for evaluating such materials ..... speech ban is not justified by ohio s asserted interests in preventing fraudulent and libelous statements and in providing the electorate with relevant information the claimed informational interest is .....

C. Ravichandran Iyer Vs. Justice A.M. Bhattacharjee and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1995(6)SC339; 1995(5)SCALE142; (1995)5SCC457; [1995]Supp3SCR319; (1995)3UPLBEC1723

..... stream out of that fountain must be impure and contaminated a libel upon a judge in his judicial capacity is a contempt ..... judges may not be capable of being made the subject of libel proceedings at all secondly judges commonly feel constrained by their ..... proceedings against the office bearers of the bar association and group libel against all concerned the independence of judiciary and the stream of .....

Arun Kumar Krishnarao Balpande Vs. Wasudeorao Kondbaji Ganar and Other ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1996CriLJ1091; 1996(1)MhLj491

..... said statement though certain imputations against a judge may be only libellous against that particular individual it may at times amount to contempt ..... held that a defamatory attack on a judge may be a libel so far as the judge is concerned and it would ..... 1971crilj844 therefore apart from the fact that a particular statement is libellous it can constitute criminal contempt if the imputation is such .....

Milwaukee Vs. Cement Div., National Gypsum Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 3 dall 333 a prize case decided in 1796 we affirmed a decree awarding the libellant interest from the day of capture id at 334 in the amiable nancy 3 wheat ..... 327 335 1817 marshall c j remanding with instructions to ascertain damages suffered by the libellants in doing which the value of the vessel and the prime cost of the cargo .....

D.C. Sankhla Vs. Ashok K. Parmar

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (1995)111PLR68; 1995RLR292

..... 2 the first respondent filed a suit for recovery of damages for the tort of libel the alleged insinuation is said to have been made on 11 9 1986 in a ..... that the suit has to be filed within one year from the date when the libel is published the presentation of the plaint is thereforee clearly within limitation 3 the point .....

Shree Sanand Textile Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Naranji Peraj Transp ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR1996Guj107

..... air 1954 cal 369 before the learned single judge the plaintiff instituted the suit for libel against the defendant on 7 9 1950 the writ of summons was issued and it ..... will not be in a position to bring a fresh suit because such suit for libel is barred by limitation today but that is a situation which the plaintiff has sought .....

Board of Comm'rs, Wabaunsee Cty. Vs. Umbehr

Court: US Supreme Court

..... free speech including the sedition act of 1798 and the common law as to seditious libel in favor of the true theory of our constitution which values free speech as essential ..... a matter of history or else it is a matter of opinion why are not libel laws such an abridgment the only satisfactory answer is that they never were what secret .....

Bmw of North America, Inc. Vs. Gore

Court: US Supreme Court

..... v sullivan 376 u s 254 1964 the court observed that the punitive award for libel was one thousand times greater than the maximum fine provided by the alabama criminal statute .....

Lebron Vs. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

Court: US Supreme Court

..... advertisement which in the judgement of licensor is or might be deemed to be slanderous libelous unlawful immoral or offensive to good taste app 326 19 amtrak simply continued this policy .....

Pyarelal Maganlal Jaiswal Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1996CriLJ989

..... we are of the opinion that the proposition laid down in english decisions dealing with libel that the actual words alleged to be used must be stated in the indictment cannot .....