Levelism - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: levelism Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 302 results (0.025 seconds)State of Manipur and Ors. Vs. All Manipur Village Level Worker's Sub-C ...
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: May-09-2000
..... of manipur and they formed an association called all manipur village level workers sub committee with an object to safeguard promote and ..... consideration in fixing pay scales the method of recruitment the level at which the initial recruitment is made in the hierarchy ..... of rural development and panchayati raj manipur for enabling the village level workers in short vlws to enjoy the monthly pay scale .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGunda Venkata Ramana Vs. District Level Committee, Srikakulam and Othe ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-11-2000
Reported in: 2000(4)ALD585; 2000(4)ALT623
..... by a notification dated 30 5 2000 issued by the district level committee proposing to re auction the right to quarry sand on ..... of sand and other related matters as already noticed the district level committee was constituted by the government in g o ms no ..... 4 the gram panchayat shall submit the material to the district level committee through the district panchayat officer to notify the sand bearing .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri Balaji Oil and Ice Industries, Agra Vs. Divisional Level Sales Tax ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-09-2000
Reported in: JT2000(4)SC347; (2001)9SCC298
orders p bharucha and s n phukan jj 1 we will assume that this is a beneficial legislation but in...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNayan G. Joshi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ahmedabad
Decided on: Mar-30-2000
..... as direct recruits and as posts were available at the level of senior clerks against serving graduate quota they were accommodated ..... by the railway recruitment board for direct recruitment to the level of senior clerks against the serving graduate quota we notice ..... serving graduate quota in other words posts were available at the level of senior clerks against the quota meant for serving graduates .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB.D. Alloys Vs. State of Haryana and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-27-2000
Reported in: [2001]124STC174(P& H)
..... the additional affidavit of smt sunita jindal and annexure d1 to show that the lower level screening committee rejected its application without giving effective opportunity of hearing he further argued that ..... of natural justice shri d d verma submitted that before rejecting its application the lower level screening committee did not give reasonable opportunity of hearing to the representative of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDileep Sharma and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Jaipur
Decided on: Apr-10-2000
..... accelerated promotion s due to reservation and had reached the level of head clerk earlier than their senior general category colleagues ..... the reserved candidate the roster point promotee at the promotional level as well unless of course the reserved candidate got a ..... roster point merely becomes operative whenever a vacancy reserved at level 2 becomes available once such vacancies are all filled the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. Velayudhan Vs. Postmaster General, Northern
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Jan-24-2000
..... promoted at two levels by roster points say from level 1 to level 2 and level 2 to level 3 cannot count their seniority at level 3 as against ..... regard to the seniority of the reserved candidates at the promotional level where such promotions have taken place before 1 3 96 90 ..... reached there later but before the reserved candidates was promoted to level 4 and when in spite of the fact that the senior .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.M. Joshi Vs. Chairman, Isro and anr.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ahmedabad
Decided on: Mar-16-2000
..... arbitrary and discriminatory he seeks a direction to the respondents to promote him to the level of scientist engineer se retrospectively when some of his juniors were promoted 3 the respondents ..... applicant was considered for promotion in accordance with detailed instructions which regulated promotion from the level of scientist engineer s d to scientist engineer s e and also by duly constituted .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKalyanesh Kumar Bajpai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Lucknow
Decided on: Oct-10-2000
..... not the same as those for giving promotion at the sag level the applicant might have been performing well to justify his ..... for superseding an officer thus the applicant s supersession to sag level was not inconformity with the instructions issued by the rly board ..... of the applicant for posting as adrm on promotion to sag level is rejected it is entirely for the railway administration to consider .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPennar Delta Auyacutdars Association and Others Vs. Government of Andh ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-10-2000
Reported in: 2000(3)ALD182; 2000(2)ALT634
..... representatives of the people and technical experts together the decision is processed at various levels involving more than one individual such decisions cannot be characterised as arbitrary and ..... populations and of ethnic and religious minorities and opposition groups of regional and national levels t scudder victims of development revisisted the political costs of river basin development .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial