Let - Year 2001 - Judgments

Sep 09 2001 (TRI)

New Paris Complex Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin

Decided on: Sep-09-2001

Reported in: (2002)83ITD254(Coch.)

..... learned chartered accountant submitted that there is no inherent limitation that any income from a let out building should always be treated as income from house property citing the above ..... the learned chartered accountant pointed out that the expression business covers even an activity of letting out buildings to tenants and earning rent therefrom the learned chartered accountant also relied on .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 31 2001 (TRI)

Assistant Commissioner of Vs. Eastern Industrial Enterprises

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Guwahati

Decided on: Jul-31-2001

Reported in: (2002)80ITD355(Gau.)

..... departmental representative submitted that the income of the assessee company from letting out the building to various tenants on monthly rental basis ..... be treated as income from business since the company is letting out the property in furtherance of its object in the ..... we have already discussed the activities of the assessee in letting out the premises to various tenants on monthly rental basis .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 27 2001 (SC)

M/S. Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. Vs. M/S. Amrit Lal and Co. and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-27-2001

Reported in: AIR2001SC3580; 93(2001)DLT164(SC); JT2001(7)SC477; 2001(5)SCALE509; (2001)8SCC397

..... misused hence interpreters including counsel has to keep balance not to let this misuse surface as knife in the hand of a ..... for the recovery of possession thereof e that the premises let for residential purposes are required bona fide by the landlord ..... section 15 of that act unconditionally prohibited a tenant from sub letting the saurashtra act nowhere insists that the landlord should issue .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 21 2001 (SC)

Mrs. Kapil Bhargava and ors. Vs. Subhash Chand Aggarwal and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-21-2001

Reported in: AIR2001SC3334; 93(2001)DLT65(SC); JT2001(6)SC650; 2002(3)MPHT362; 2001(5)SCALE389; (2001)6SCC645

..... of the landlord shall be deemed to have bene lawfully sub let 3 after the commencement of this act no tenant shall without ..... section 2 the landlord contests that the premises were not lawfully sub let and an application is made to the controller in this behalf ..... mandates a tenant after the commencement of the act not to sub let any premises without written consent of the landlord the present case .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 16 2001 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Shambhu Investment Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-16-2001

Reported in: (2001)168CTR(Cal)237,[2001]249ITR47(Cal)

..... apex court held that although it is a case of letting out such letting out was a complex one and the return received by ..... said premises have been furnished by the assessee and have been let out to various persons and or firms and or organisations ..... mad a building completely furnished including microphone fittings fixtures etc and letting out for limited period for marriage ceremony and other social .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 02 2001 (HC)

National Properties Ltd. Vs. Bata India Limited

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-02-2001

Reported in: AIR2001Cal177

..... herein had started negotiations with the railway electrification department of the government of india to let out a portion of the said building upon receipt of the aforesaid information plaintiff ..... 1958 wherefrom the plaintiff came to know that the appellant defendant herein was negotiating for letting out the first and second floors of the premises with railway electrification department and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 28 2001 (TRI)

income Tax Officer Vs. Chem Mech (P) Ltd.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-28-2001

Reported in: (2002)83ITD427(Mum.)

..... and is unreasonable and excessive ii in estimating the annual letting value in relation to addition to the existing residential house ..... municipal corporation of greater bombay and further held that annual letting value under section 23 cannot exceed the standard rent under ..... municipal value is available that itself would be the annual letting value under the act after going through the various court .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 29 2001 (TRI)

M. Visvesvaraya Industrial Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-29-2001

Reported in: (2002)83ITD511(Mum.)

..... to house or accommodate either for its own use or for letting out inter alia scientific research bodies trade and or industrial museums ..... primary basic rent was absolutely essential before the lessor could be let into the possession of the premises under the lease agreement ..... to house or accommodate either for its own use or for letting out inter alia scientific research bodies trade and or industrial .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 25 2001 (HC)

Rudrappa Mahadevappa Humbi (Deceased) by L.Rs and ors. Vs. Shivalingap ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-25-2001

Reported in: 2001(6)KarLJ394

..... give a finding on the question whether the tenants have sub let the premises after permitting the parties to lead additional evidence ..... trial court and held that the tenants are guilty of sub letting the premises to one balaji enterprises toddy contractor therefore liable to ..... in any other manner his interest therein and where the sub letting assignment or transfer has been made before the coming into .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 20 2001 (SC)

M/S. Atul Castings Ltd. Vs. Bawa Gurvachan Singh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-20-2001

Reported in: AIR2001SC1684; JT2001(5)SC109; 2001(3)SCALE454; (2001)5SCC133; [2001]3SCR124

..... of the original eviction petition reads that the premises has been let out for residential purposes only that the respondent has started ..... after the amendment it reads that the premises has been let tout for residential purposes only that the respondent has started ..... either admitted or established in that case the building was let solely for residential purpose husband of the tenant established his .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Let - Judgment Search Results