Lawsuit - Judgment Search Results
Prosecution Version Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-14-2014
months. Both the substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently. Prosecution version 2. The prosecution case as it emerges from statement
Prosecution. Vs. State of Haryana and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-23-2014
The petitioners did the same and served the respondent-authorities vide legal notice(s) dated 03.04.2013. Finding no response, they have again knocked
Mohd Abaad Ali Vs. Directtorate Of Revenue Prosecution Intelligence
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-20-2024
MOHD ABAAD ALI & ANR. …APPELLANTS VERSUS DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE PROSECUTION INTELLIGENCE …RESPONDENT JUDGMENT SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J.Leave granted.1. The present appellant
Rakesh R. Sharma Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Prosecutio ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-31-2004
Reported in: 2005CriLJ774
custody since 19.6.1998 till this date.2. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that, The Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Sahar
Superintendent (Prosecution) Vs. Sita Ram Somani and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-24-2009
Reported in: RLW2009(4)Raj3430
after referred to as 'Act, 1962').2. The nub of the prosecution story is as under:That on a prior information regarding illicit
Velvette International Pharma Products Ltd. Rep. by Its Managing Direc ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-29-2005
Reported in: 2006(196)ELT143(Mad)
dated 16.04.2003 preferred by the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, Prosecution Unit against the petitioners.3. The complaint was preferred on the
Rekhaparameswari D/O. Govindaraj Vs. Assistant Collector of Customs, P ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-22-2009
Reported in: 2009CriLJ3315
appellant herein had preferred this appeal.2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows:P.W.1 Usharani, who was the Security
Smt.Rukshana Deshpande. Vs. the Additional Commissioner of Central Exc ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-13-2010
SCC 543 [Uttam Chand v. I.T.O.], Income Tax Authorities launched prosecution against the appellant and others on the ground that when
C.Sreeja Vs. Director General of Prosecution
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-14-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY...
“learned Counsel Inter-alia Contended That If the Allegations of the ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-08-2013
present petition deserves to be accepted in this regard.4. The prosecution claimed that on 20.1.2013, as soon as, complainant Sandeep Singh
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »