Skip to content

Lawsuit - Judgment Search Results

Jul 14 2014

Prosecution Version Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-14-2014

months. Both the substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently. Prosecution version 2. The prosecution case as it emerges from statement


Jul 23 2014

Prosecution. Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-23-2014

The petitioners did the same and served the respondent-authorities vide legal notice(s) dated 03.04.2013. Finding no response, they have again knocked


Feb 20 2024

Mohd Abaad Ali Vs. Directtorate Of Revenue Prosecution Intelligence

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-20-2024

MOHD ABAAD ALI & ANR. …APPELLANTS VERSUS DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE PROSECUTION INTELLIGENCE …RESPONDENT JUDGMENT SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J.Leave granted.1. The present appellant


Aug 31 2004

Rakesh R. Sharma Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Prosecutio ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-31-2004

Reported in: 2005CriLJ774

custody since 19.6.1998 till this date.2. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that, The Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Sahar


Apr 24 2009

Superintendent (Prosecution) Vs. Sita Ram Somani and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Apr-24-2009

Reported in: RLW2009(4)Raj3430

after referred to as 'Act, 1962').2. The nub of the prosecution story is as under:That on a prior information regarding illicit


Mar 29 2005

Velvette International Pharma Products Ltd. Rep. by Its Managing Direc ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-29-2005

Reported in: 2006(196)ELT143(Mad)

dated 16.04.2003 preferred by the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, Prosecution Unit against the petitioners.3. The complaint was preferred on the


Apr 22 2009

Rekhaparameswari D/O. Govindaraj Vs. Assistant Collector of Customs, P ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-22-2009

Reported in: 2009CriLJ3315

appellant herein had preferred this appeal.2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows:P.W.1 Usharani, who was the Security


Aug 13 2010

Smt.Rukshana Deshpande. Vs. the Additional Commissioner of Central Exc ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-13-2010

SCC 543 [Uttam Chand v. I.T.O.], Income Tax Authorities launched prosecution against the appellant and others on the ground that when


Jan 14 2013

C.Sreeja Vs. Director General of Prosecution

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-14-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY...


Mar 08 2013

“learned Counsel Inter-alia Contended That If the Allegations of the ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-08-2013

present petition deserves to be accepted in this regard.4. The prosecution claimed that on 20.1.2013, as soon as, complainant Sandeep Singh


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »




Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial