Lady Hardinge Medical College And Hospital Acquisition And Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1977 Section 5 - Judgment Search Results

Kumari Chitra Ghosh and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1970SC35; (1969)2SCC228; [1970]1SCR413

in april 1968 and obtained 62 5 admission denied at lady hardinge medical college and maulana azad medical college eligibility mentioned first year m b b s class at the lady hardinge medical college new delhi but they were not admitted thereafter cultural colombo plan and thailand scholars are given admission in medical institutions in this country by reason of reciprocal arrangements of exception of himachal pradesh they do not have any medical college of their own it was necessary that persons desirous of ch sinha v v n singh principal p m c hospital and ors i l r pat 616 be of any the article shall prevent the state from making any special provision for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes admission committee it appears that the central government has been acting in a very reasonable way inasmuch as when nominations were is dismissed with no order as to costs constitution reservation sections 114 and 141 and order 47 rules 1 and 7 examination of delhi university in april 1968 and obtained 62 5 admission denied at lady hardinge medical college and maulana azad

Dr. Miss Binapani Dei Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1965Ori81; (1965)ILLJ335Ori

to fix the dates of birth as reported by the lady hardinge medical college new delhi as the correct dates of fix the dates of birth as reported by the lady hardinge medical college new delhi as the correct dates of birth viz copy of the letter of the principal lady hardinge medical college new delhi sent to him by sri s k to government the report of the principal lady hardinge medical college hospital new delhi about the date of birth of the corresponded with the principal of the lady hardinge medical college hospital new delhi where the petitioner studied for her m b service by way of punishment so as to attract the provisions of article 311 2 of the constitution read with rule is not known an approximate date may be given the actual date or the assumed date determined under rule 66 should for the purpose of deposit under first proviso to sub section 1 of section 173 is necessary new india assurance co mentioned in the civil list can be reopened and rr 55 and 65 of the orissa general financial rules do not

Sushil Sharma Vs. State (Nct) of Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

bones the report also shows how the body travelled from lady hardinge medical college to the civil hospital the body was 5 7 1995 at 3 30 p m at lady hardinge medical college stated that he had opened the skull and reject this submission 45 we shall now go to the medical evidence we have already reproduced the observations made by pw the board the post mortem started at lady hardinge medical college at 12 00 noon and thereafter the body was shifted singh in a sealed cover with the seal of civil hospital pw 57 si ombir singh has confirmed this fact he delhi in bangalore i e outside his territorial jurisdiction therefore provisions of sub sections 4 and 5 of section 165 of d if the murder is of a person who had acted in the lawful discharge of his duty under section 43 had acted in the lawful discharge of his duty under section 43 of the code of criminal procedure 1973 or who party 6 patrolling officer si rajesh kumar along with cw 5 hc majid khan of police control room pw 62 pc

Veena Gupta Vs. University of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1993(27)DRJ249; (1994)2UPLBEC1136

effect that one seat ofm d dermatology was available in lady hardinge medical college and the same should be allotted to husband appeared and produced the letter of principal of lady hardinge medical college stating that there was a vacancy in m the aforesaid seat of m d dermatology in lady hardinge medical college was also not notified to the university when the aforesaid seat of m d dermatology in lady hardinge medical college was also not notified to the university when the third seat of m d medicine is available in a good hospital in delhi and the same is not notified the affect daughter namely respondent no 4 wanted we strongly deprecate the action of respondent no 3 who was occupying a position of did not send the vacancy position in his college a section officer and senior assistant of university of delhi then met that this seat should be offered to respondent no 4 5 the affidavit of prof wasan further states that since a

Faculty Association, Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Hospi ...

Court : Delhi

the contention is denied by the respondents who state that lady hardinge medical college is not attached to r m l college the respondents submit that about two decades back lady hardinge medical college did not have any male patients and students between the two commas the phrase not attached to any medical college is used the use of the comma before the duration of the post graduate course limited to the medical college institution to which he she is admitted for the time only to those many number of consultants in the concerned hospital institution so as to fulfil the minimum requirement for imparting the central government may take action in terms of the provisions contained in section 19 of the medical council act the murli babu rao supra referring to section 33 of the act which empowers the mci to frame regulations the supreme court medical college within the meaning of the act further sub section 1 to section 10a consists of clauses a and b also pray that guru gobind singh indraprastha university respondent no 5 herein should be restrained from equating non teaching specialists and

Union of India & Ors. Vs.saroj Mohan

Court : Delhi

research officer sro in the department of micro biology at lady hardinge medical college and hospital lhmch in the icmr centre wp c 782 2003 page 5 of 12 department lady hardinge medical hospital new delhi shri a k sikri appearing for icmr and they were the employees of the lady hardinge medical college emphasis supplied 15 mr garg submits that this order worked in the icmr project at the lady hardinge medical college were not the employees of the icmr and they were regular establishment of kalavati saran children s hospital an associate hospital of lhmc 21 both dr kapoor and mohan made representations the first oas were filed being aggrieved by the contemplated action of termination since both the reliefs were separate and wp microbiology wp c 8585 2004 wp c 782 2003 page 5 of 12 department lady hardinge medical hospital new delhi shri

Dr. Lakshmy Anantha Raman vs.union of India & Others

Court : Delhi

head of microbiology department to the administrative officer of the lady hardinge medical college the said letter records that the petitioner years 2 the petitioner had joined the third respondent lady hardinge medical college and smt s k hospital and was appointed been entrusted with duties and responsibilities of the senior resident medical she had been taking second year mbbs lectures in applied is an undisputed and admitted position that lady hardinge medical college and hospital where the petitioner was working has been recognised undisputed and admitted position that lady hardinge medical college and hospital where the petitioner was working has been recognised by the the enhancement of retirement age as mentioned above and the provision for re employment will apply only to persons in teaching sections of the department she was involved in ongoing research activities of the department and had presented and published research work petitioner would participate in patient care by working in various sections of the department she was involved in ongoing research activities had presented and published research work w p c no 5330 2015 page 10 of 13 14 clause 2 of schedule

Union of India & Ors. Vs.dr. A.k. Kapoor

Court : Delhi

the respondents were to be treated as employees of the lady hardinge medical college the submission of the petitioners would be respondents were to be treated as employees of the lady hardinge medical college the submission of the petitioners would be misplaced c 782 2003 page 5 of 12 department lady hardinge medical hospital new delhi shri a k sikri appearing for the the project were the employees of the lady hardinge medical college the respondents had relied upon the language used in the absorbed in the regular establishment of kalavati saran children s hospital an associate hospital of lhmc 21 both dr kapoor and the first oas were filed being aggrieved by the contemplated action of termination since both the reliefs were separate and wp both dr kapoor and mohan filed applications before the tribunal 5 by an order dated 4th december 1992 the tribunal ordered

Dr. Asim Kumar Bose Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1983SC509; 1982(2)SCALE1299; (1983)1SCC345; [1983]2SCR16; 1983(1)SLJ203(SC); 1983(15)LC43(SC)

service are 1 maulana azad medical college new delhi 2 lady hardinge medical college new delhi and 3 jawaharlal institute of are 1 maulana azad medical college new delhi 2 lady hardinge medical college new delhi and 3 jawaharlal institute of post the post of associate professor of radiotherapy in maulana azad medical college which had fallen vacant in 1973 the second respondent graduate and under graduate students of the maulana azad medical college the letter is self explanatory and reads with reference to who while holding a non clinical post in a teaching hospital like the irwin hospital has been actually teaching the students forum held revision application though not a suit and although provisions of section 14 per se may not be applicable principles 51 we find it rather difficult to support the impugned action of the government of india in the health ministry in as upsc undoubtedly had power to relax any of qualifications sections 9 s b sinha dr mukundakam sharma jj jurisdiction of health service rules 1963 which came into force on may 5 1963 rule 3 provided for the constitution of the central

Irfan@ Naka Vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

dr saurav rml hospital pw 6 7 dr rahul band lady hardinge medical college pw 7 new delhi 8 dr kuldeep saurav rml hospital pw 6 7 dr rahul band lady hardinge medical college pw 7 new delhi 8 dr kuldeep panchal rml hospital pw 6 7 dr rahul band lady hardinge medical college pw 7 new delhi 8 dr kuldeep panchal lady hospital pw 6 7 dr rahul band lady hardinge medical college pw 7 new delhi 8 dr kuldeep panchal lady hardinge on 07 08 2014 he was posted at the rml hospital on that day he had recorded the statement of islamuddin fair hearing or has acted in violation of a mandatory provision of law or procedure resulting in serious prejudice or injustice admitted by reference to section 32 of the indian evidence act 1872 would necessarily be less than that attached to a punishable under section 302 ipc for the offence punishable under section 436 ipc the convict was awarded life imprisonment with fine was used 32 a s i narender singh rawat pw 5 was recalled for the purpose of re examination on 28