Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: konkan passenger ships acquisition act 1973 section 14 penalties Year: 2010 Page 1 of about 34 results (0.251 seconds)

Union of India (Uoi) Through the Commissioner of Customs (P) Vs. Mr. Z ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2010(112)BomLR2266,2010(176)LC257(Bombay)

..... the currency declaration form. i dispatched it to administration office. i am shown the form. it is the same form it was produced before me by the passenger and it was sent to administration office by me.' in similar way, other witnesses also admitted the fact about the currency declaration form and the currency brought ..... ccs (cca) rules, 1965 wherein the joint commissioner of customs (vigilance), mumbai held that the inquiry officer's observations were based solely on the retracted statements of the passenger i.e. respondent no. 1 and therefore, it was not necessary to impose major punishment on the respondent no. 2. accordingly, the joint commissioner of customs (vigilance ..... any result and the said firm refused to reply to the queries raised by the indian authorities. mr. jetly further submitted that it is mandatory for any passenger to produce the documentary evidence of its source of procurement when the amount exceeds 250 us dollars. in the present case, the respondent no. 1 failed to .....

G. Vallikumari Vs. Andhra Education Society and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2010SC1105,JT2010(3)SC75,2010(2)SCALE1,(2010)2SCC497

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. This appeal is directed against order dated 10.4.2002 passed by the Division Bench of Delhi High Court whereby it allowed the writ petition filed by respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and declared Section 12 of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 (for short, `the Act') ultra vires the provisions of the Constitution and in so far applicability of the exclusion clause contained therein is restricted to unaided minority institutions, that Section 8(2) of the Act is not applicable to minority institutions and set aside the direction given by Delhi School Tribunal (for short, `the Tribunal') for reinstatement of the appellant with all consequential benefits.2. Respondent No. 1 is a registered society formed with the primary object of imparting education to the children belonging to Andhra community living in Delhi. Respondent No. 2 is a private linguistic minority school established by respondent No. 1 and is aided by the Government of Delhi to the extent of 95%. The appellant was ...

Smt. Selvi and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

K.G. Balakrishnan, C.J.1. Leave granted in SLP (Crl.) Nos. 10 of 2006 and 6711 of 2007. 1. The legal questions in this batch of criminal appeals relate to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. This issue has received considerable attention since it involves tensions between the desirability of efficient investigation and the preservation of individual liberties. Ordinarily the judicial task is that of evaluating the rival contentions in order to arrive at a sound conclusion. However, the present case is not an ordinary dispute between private parties. It raises pertinent questions about the meaning and scope of fundamental rights which are available to all citizens. Therefore, we must examine the implications of permitting the use of the impugned techniques in a variety of settings.2. Objecti...

Vodafone International Holdings B.V. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Mumbai

..... august 2006.the subscription rights and call options were granted to 3- global services private limited (3gspl) in consideration of 3gspl procuring credit support to finance the acquisition of investment in tii and itnl by the said indian companies.through these agreements, htil had indirect control and substantial influence over hel which was characterized as ..... the obligation of the assessee to deduct tax under section 195 is limited only to the appropriate portion of income chargeable under the act.112. in vijay ship breaking corporation v/s. commissioner of income tax41, the issue which arose for determination before the supreme court was whether the assessee was bound to deduct tds ..... under section 195(1) in respect of usance interest paid for the purchase of a vessel for ship breaking. the assessee contended that usance interest had the character of the purchase price and hence tds was not deductible. the supreme court held that it .....

George Muthoot Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2010(1)KLT399

..... by road side; they parked tempo traveller and questioned paul's conduct in not stopping after accident with motorcycle and after verbal exchange, one of them stabbed paul; and the passengers in tempo traveller were all drunk and have stabbed paul under sudden alcoholic intoxication (?). he further states that the assault was due to sudden provocation by deceased himself. he even ..... car of the deceased and on seeing arrival of shibu, they went away in the tempo traveller towards alappuzha.42. after the departure of said 10 to 15 persons, the passenger of scorpio (manu) and driver shibu got down and noticed deceased lying down in pool of blood. they lifted him and kept him in scorpio. they also noticed another person .....

Bhim Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... purposes belonging to central, state, ut and local self governments. (this will be subject to 10% of the capital cost of the work for which such items are proposed)9. acquisition of land or any compensation for land acquired.10. reimbursement of any type of completed or partly completed works or items.11. assets for individual/family benefits.12. all revenue .....

Mandvi Co-op. Bank Ltd. Vs. Nimesh B. Thakore

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2010(1)BomCR614; JT2010(1)SC259; 2010(I)OLR(SC)306; 2010(1)SCALE188; (2010)3SCC83; [2010]98SCL139(SC); 2010(1)LC454(SC)

Aftab Alam, J.1. Leave granted2. In these appeals we are required to consider the special provisions laid down by Section 145 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (`the Act', hereinafter) for a dishonoured cheque trial and to consider how far certain assertions made by the accused are in accordance with the provisions contained in the two Sub-sections of that section.3. The High Court had before it a large number of writ petitions and applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Most of those petitions were filed on behalf of the accused but a few were also at the instance of the complainants. On the basis of the grievances made and reliefs prayed for in those petitions the High Court framed the following two questions as arising for its consideration:(A) Whether Sub-section (2) of Section 145 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, (for short, 'the Act') confers an unfettered right on the complainant and the accused to apply to the court seeking direction to g...

Delhi Development Authority Vs. Central Information Commission and anr ...

Court : Delhi

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.PREFACE1. Information is power. This is truer now, in this information age, than ever before. In a democracy this power of information which the public authorities possess is to be shared with the people. But at the same time, not every piece of information is to be made public. There is the public interest and democratic purpose in dissemination of information on the one hand and the competing private rights and national interests in general non-disclosure, on the other. This is recognized in the preamble to the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act') itself:And whereas democracy requires an informed citizenry and transparency of information which are vital to its functioning and also to contain corruption and to hold Governments and their instrumentalities accountable to the governed;And whereas revelation of information in actual practice is likely to conflict with other public interests including efficient operations of the G...

Ex. L/Nk Vimal Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Gita Mittal, J.1. By this writ petition, the petitioner assails an order and sentence dated 17th February, 1999 passed by the Summary Security Force Court (hereinafter referred to 'SSFC' for brevity) finding the petitioner guilty of an offence under Section 26 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to 'BSF Act' for brevity) and the sentence of dismissal from service. The petitioner also assails the action of Deputy Inspector General, respondent No. 2 in countersigning the dismissal order on 8th April, 1999 and the order dated 13/16th August, 1999 whereby the petitioner's revision petition under Section 117(2) of the BSF Act was rejected by the respondent No. 2.2. The petitioner was enrolled on 1st April, 1986 into the Border Security Force. In 1995, he was promoted as a lance naik and finally posted to 130Bn B.S.F. located at Salbagan, Tripura in which position he was serving at the time of the incident resulting in the passing of the impugned orders.3. It is alle...

Bpl Mobile Cellular Limited and Others Versus Department of Telecommun ...

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

..... : thus to apply an amending act, which creates a new obligation to pay additional compensation, or which reduces the rate of compensation, to pending proceedings for determination of compensation for acquisitions already made, will be to construe it retrospective which cannot be done unless such construction follows from express words or necessary implication. similarly, a new law enhancing compensation payable in ..... establish, maintain or work a telegraph within any part of india. the second proviso appended thereto enables the central government to permit establishment, maintenance and working of wireless telegraphs on ships and telegraphs other than wireless telegraphs to any person on such terms and conditions as made by rules prescribed. section 7 of the act provides for the rule making power .....