Knowingly - Judgment Search Results

Sandeep Enterprises (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in: (1989)31ITD101(Ahd.)

1 both the above appeals are inter connected and therefore they are disposed of by this common order for the...

Harte-hanks Communs. Vs. Connaughton

Court: US Supreme Court

harte hanks communs v connaughton 491 u s 657 1989 u s supreme court harte hanks communs v connaughton 491...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sofremines (India) Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1990]186ITR67(Cal)

suhas chandra sen j 1 the following three questions have been referred by the tribunal under section 256 1 of...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. National Engineering Industries Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1990)85CTR(Cal)98,[1991]190ITR525(Cal)

suhas chandra sen j 1 the tribunal has referred the following two questions of law under section 256 2 of...

Raj Kishore Gupta Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1990)(48)ELT64TriDel

1 since all the 4 appeals arise out of a common impugned order a common order is being passed 1...

Texas Vs. Johnson

Court: US Supreme Court

title 18 u s c 700 a provides that whoever knowingly casts contempt upon any flag of the united states by

Charanjit Grover Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [1990]33ITD50(Delhi)

orderper agarwal jm this is an assesseds second appeal arising out of his assessment for assessment year 1985 86 and...

Sarabhai Foundation Vs. Income-tax Officer.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in: (1989)30ITD23(Ahd.)

per shri k r dixit judicial member the central issue in this appeal is in respect of the claim to...

Md. Abdul Matlib Vs. State of Assam

Court: Guwahati

j m srivastava j 1 this revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 6 1 83 passed by...

Bhansingh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 1990MPLJ339

..... appellant adjured the guilt and stated that he does not know anything about the incidents the plea of insanity under section ..... held cannot be accepted because the appellant was capable of knowing what he did accordingly the appellant has been convicted for ..... questions for further decision are whether the accused intentionally or knowingly caused those deaths or as stated by the learned counsel .....