Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka urban water supply and drainage board act 1973 section 41 remuneration of auditor Court: mumbai

Mr. Allan S.F. Falerio Vs. State of Goa Through the Chief Secretary, S ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2010(112)BomLR7

..... are therefore not inclined to exercise our discretionary jurisdiction in favour of such a petitioner. following the judgment of the apex court in b. srinivasa reddy v. karnataka urban water supply & drainage board employees' association and ors. (supra) we are inclined to dismiss the writ petition on the second preliminary objection. we are also not inclined ..... other hand, learned counsel on behalf of the respondents have placed reliance, on this aspect of the case, on the case of b. srinivas reddy v. karnataka urban water supply & drainage board employees' association and ors. : air 2006 sc 3106 wherein the apex court has observed that a petition praying for a writ of quo ..... exceptions mentioned therein. article ii(9) defines a seagoing ship to mean a ship other than those which navigate exclusively in inland waters or in waters within, or closely adjacent to, sheltered waters or areas where port regulations apply. by the time, the stcw convention was ratified on 28-4-1984, respondent no. 2 .....

Manohar Vs. Dr. Gopal Dhavan, Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Mineral ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... . 8. the apex court in the case of b. srinivasa reddy (supra) again considered the question with regard to appointment to the office of managing director of the karnataka urban water supply and drainage board employees' association. it will be relevant to refer to paragraph 49 of the said judgment, which reads thus : 49. the law is well settled. ..... mysore .vs. c.d.govinda rao and another reported in air 1965 sc 491 and the judgment of the apex court in the case of b. srinivasa reddy .vs. karnataka urban water supply and drainage board employees' association and others reported in (2006) 11 scc 731 (ii). 5. in the case of university of mysore (supra), an appointment to the ..... that the appointment is on contract basis and until further orders. while laying down the terms of appointment in its order dated 21.4.2004, the government of karnataka clearly stated that "term of contractual appointment of sri b. srinivasa reddy shall commence on 1.2.2004 and will be in force until further orders of the .....

Adv. Aires Rodrigues Vs. the State of Goa by Its Chief Secretary and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR737

..... are quintessential features of a public office in respect of which even a writ of quo warranto would lie. see : b. srinivasa reddy v. karnataka urban water supply & drainage board employees association and ors. : air2006sc3106 .70. as far as respondent nos. 2 and 4 are concerned, they have been appointed ..... estimate for defraying expenses, was holding office of profit under the government. such an approach was held to be supported by the provisions of karnataka legislature (prevention of disqualification) act, 1956 as well as representation of people act, 1951. this approach, thus, clearly establishes that the exercise ..... parliamentary secretaries' and even their terms and conditions of appointment and dues and perks payable to them were legislated upon. the state of karnataka has enacted the karnataka parliamentary secretaries allowances act, 1963 while government of assam also enacted the assam parliamentary secretaries (appointment, salaries, allowances and miscellaneous provisions) act .....

Sambhaji Raje Sadashiv Dahatonde and anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... case, the petitioners are not aggrieved parties because only the non appointee can assail the legality of the appointment procedure in view of the decision in b.srinivasa reddy vs. karnataka urban water supply drainage board employees association, reported in 2006(11) scc 731(ii).the other category of petition is a public interest petition. so far as this aspect is concerned, the issue ..... of the nature and gravity of what was at stake, thereby virtually rendering such decision to be irrational."yet, in another reported judgment in case of b. srinivasa reddy vs. karnataka urban water supply & drainage board employees' assn. and others (2006) 11 scc 731 (ii), in paragraph 51, the apex court held that the court cannot sit in judgment over the wisdom of the .....

Goa Housing Board, Through its Managing Director and Another Vs. Deval ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

..... required to be satisfied and only on fulfillment of those factors, the compensation can be awarded according to the value of the land stated in the sale deeds. in karnataka urban water supply and drainage board and ors. v. k.s. gangadharappa and anr., (2009) 11 scc 164, factors which merit consideration as comparable sales are, inter-alia, ..... the area also developed to be valued as a building site or plot, particularly when vast tracts are acquired, as in this case, for development purpose. ? (emphasis supplied). the rule of 1/3rd deduction was reiterated in tejumal bhojwani v. state of u.p. ((2003)10 scc 525, v. hanumantha reddy v. land acquisition officer, ..... even if one portion on one sides abuts the main road, the remaining large area where planned development is required, needs laying of internal roads, drainage, sewer, water, electricity lines, providing civic amenities, etc. however, in cases of some land where there are certain advantages by virtue of the developed area around, it may .....

The Solapur Promoters and Builders Association Society and anr. Vs. th ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2005(4)ALLMR484; 2005(5)BomCR626; (2005)107BOMLR287; 2005(4)MhLj445

..... in haphazard development of such lands without the necessary infrastructure of roads, water supplies, sewerage, drainage of storm water, electricity and street lights, etc.2. the maharashtra regional and town planning act, 1966, has been enacted to provide for planned development of urban areas, by providing, inter alia, for constitution of regional planning ..... to provide. the contribution towards the development charge is therefore relatable to the amenities which are provided by the authority of roads, parks, hospitals, water supply, electricity, sewerage and drainage amongst other public services. these are under section 2(2) utilities, services and conveniences provided by the authority within the ..... chief justice then was) speaking for a bench of three learned judges of the supreme court in p.m. ashwathanarayana setty v. state of karnataka : air1989sc100 noted that a fee is 'a charge for the special service rendered to a class of citizens by government or government agencies and .....