Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka urban development authorities act 1987 chapter 1 preliminary Page 1 of about 3,234 results (0.228 seconds)

Smt. M.V. Lalithamani and ors. Vs. Mysore Urban Development Authority, ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2003KAR1695; 2003(4)KarLJ528

..... several other properties belonging to various other persons, were notified for acquisition under section 17 of the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987 ('act' for short) by a gazette notification dated 30.1.1992 and by a final notification issued under section 19(1) dated 9.3.1998 for purposes of development of mysore city nachanahalli iii stage. ..... karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987 was enacted with the purpose of developing major and important urban areas ..... the rival contentions, first it is necessary to refer to the relevant provisions of the urban development authority act in relation to the statutory requirements for acquisition of property.13. ..... however the division bench of this court in shimoga urban development authority's case, while interpreting sections 17 and 19 of the act, relying on the decision of the supreme court ..... petitioners have challenged in these petitions the acquisition proceedings initiated by the mysore urban development authority (muda for short) in respect of several items of agricultural lands situate at nachanahalli village, mysore taluk more particularly described in the schedule to the writ ..... in the file dd 26 udd 26 mib 98 on 13.2.1998, there is a noting to the effect that the commissioner, muda has proposed to acquire the lands for the development of nachanahalli iii stage by a preliminary notification dated 30.1.1992 and approval is sought for issuing the final notification under section 19(1) and (2). ..... chapter iii of the act .....

Smt. Thimmavva Vs. the State of Karnataka Represented by Its Principal ...

Court : Karnataka

..... learned counsel for the petitioner points to section 173 of the kmc act, to submit that an improvement board established by the state government having jurisdiction over the municipal area of tumkur stood dissolved and the karnataka improvement boards act, 1976 ceased to be applicable to tumkur area on the constitution of the tumkur urban development authority-5th respondent under the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987, for short kuda act and in the light of section 78 therein. ..... the respondent-municipality having placed no request or recommendation with the 5th respondent-urban development authority, it cannot but be said that the power exercised by the deputy commissioner under section 4 of the land acquisition act to issue the preliminary notification proposing to acquire lands belonging to the petitioner amongst others, falls short of being legal and valid and sequentially proceedings both in the enquiry under section 5a and the issue of final notification, annexure a are ..... section 76 of the kuda act, makes chapter 8 of the km act, inapplicable to the tmc, tumkur, on the constitution of the 5th respondent urban development authority, thus, denuding the tmc, tumkur from exercising a jurisdiction in the matter of preparing improvement schemes, to undertake works, incurs expenditure for improvement etc. .....

Smt. Sharfunnissa Vs. the Deputy Commissioner and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2004KAR5062

..... the issuance of preliminary notification by the state government under the provisions of karnataka urban development authority act of 1987 for acquisition of the lands in question is not in dispute. ..... in the order of the 1st respondent he has assigned two reasons namely : (1) that the lands in, question are acquired or proposed to be acquired in favour of the mysore urban development authority and (2) as per the provisions of the klrf act, 15 years of non-alienation period has not been completed for sale of lands. ..... , 1986(1) klj 237 wherein the provision of section 95 of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 (in short klr act) has been interpreted by this court and law has been laid down as under:'the authority to grant conversion cannot refuse the same if it is not covered by the prohibitions contained in section 95 of the land revenue act. ..... section 62 of the klrf act stipulates that, if the person who has been registered as occupant under chapter -iii of the klrf act or his successor in title intends within six years from the date of such registration to give up personal cultivation of the land, he shall surrender the land to the state government. .....

M.D. Narayan Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1999(4)KarLJ572

..... --notwithstanding anything contained in any judgment, decree or order of any court, tribunal or any other authority, zonal regulations appended to the outline development plan of the bangalore city planning area made under the karnataka town and country planning act, 1961 (karnataka act 11 of 1963} as they existed during the period from 22nd may, 1972 to 12th october, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as the 'said zonal regulations') shall be deemed to have been modified as specified in the schedule with ..... (2) there shall be a committee for the purpose of regularisation of constructions referred to in sub-section (1) consisting of the following members, namely--(i)the secretary to government, urban development departmentchairman(ii)the commissioner, corporation of the cityof bangaloremember(iii)the commissioner, bangalore developmentauthoritymember(iv)the director of town planningmember-secretary (3) the committee shall scrutinise the applications received under sub-section (1) and after ..... chapter vii makes provision for disputed ownership, preliminary scheme, final scheme, its sanction and ..... was taken to the supreme court by way of special leave petition and the supreme court dismissed it on 19-1-1987 with adirection that the judgment of the high court should be given effect. ..... to in the statement of objects and reasons culminating in the dismissing of the special leave petition vide the judgment of the supreme court on 19-1-1987 was admittedly between the contesting parties herein. .....

shankar.V Vs. The Secretary

Court : Karnataka

..... ) and 1 secretary urban development authority vikas soudha, ambedkar veedhi bangalroe 2 under secretary finance department (sangrana cell) vidhana soudha bangalore under secretary urban development department vikas soudha bangalore director municipal corporation m s building, ambedkar veedhi bangalore deputy commissioner kolar district kolar town planning director district urban development cell kolar district kolar the kolar nirmithi kendra honnenahalli, tamaka post kolar taluk & district chief executive officer srinivasapura town municipality srinivasapura, kolar ..... the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners / appellants is that the order dated 27.10.2014 granting exemption from the provisions of chapter ii of the act under section 4(g) is a non- speaking order, as no reasons have been assigned for granting such exemption especially when three weeks earlier, i.e ..... , delivered the following: appeals coming on for preliminary hearing this day, vineet writ appeals are filed under s.4 of the high courts act, 1961 the dispute in the present appeals is with regard to the contract judgment for construction of a commercial complex to be raised by srinivasapura town municipality, kolar ..... one such condition was that the procedure laid down in the karnataka transparency in public procurement act, 1999 (for short the act ) and the rules framed thereunder, as well as the procedure for e-procurement method, be observed and also to obtain approval of the competent authority. .....

J Venkatesh Reddy Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... in respect of acquisition made under the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987 and the bengaluru development authority act, 1976 (section 36(2)), this court in the case of chikkatayamma, has held that section 36 of the said acts have to be constructed as legislation ..... under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to call for the entire record from the office of karnataka industrial areas development board in the matter of land acquisition proceedings vide notification dated 13.03.2012 and 04.12.2012; quash the preliminary notification dated 13.3.2012 under section 28(1) of the karnataka industrial areas development board act 1966 at annexure-c and final notification dated 4.12.2012 under section 28(4) at annexure-d duly gazette and published from the ..... in the state as an industrial area, by the state government under the karnataka industrial areas development act, 1966 (karnataka act no.18/1996) and also the provisions of sections 28 to 31 in chapter vii in the said act relating to acquisition and disposal of land for the purpose of 60 development of industries in such industrial areas notified under section 3 of the act, is questioned as the said provisions are repugnant to the provisions of the 2013 act (central act no.30/2013), which provides for acquisition of land for infrastructure projects, which ..... . chapter iv provides for preliminary notification ..... . chapter iii provides for preliminary notification for land acquisition and rehabilitation and .....

J. Venkatesh Reddy and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, Represented ...

Court : Karnataka

..... in respect of acquisition made under the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987 and the bengaluru development authority act, 1976 (section 36(2)), this court in the case of chikkatayamma, has held that section 36 of the said acts have to be constructed as legislation by ..... under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to call for the entire record from the office of karnataka industrial areas development board in the matter of land acquisition proceedings vide notification dated 13.03.2012 and 04.12.2012; quash the preliminary notification dated 13.3.2012 under section 28(1) of the karnataka industrial areas development board act 1966 at annexure-c and final notification dated 4.12.2012 under section 28(4) at annexure-d duly gazette and published from the ..... the state as an industrial area, by the state government under the karnataka industrial areas development act, 1966 (karnataka act no.18/1996) and also the provisions of sections 28 to 31 in chapter vii in the said act relating to acquisition and disposal of land for the purpose of development of industries in such industrial areas notified under section 3 of the act, is questioned as the said provisions are repugnant to the provisions of the 2013 act (central act no.30/2013), which provides for acquisition of land for infrastructure projects, which ..... chapter -iv provides for preliminary notification ..... chapter -iii provides for preliminary notification for land acquisition and rehabilitation and .....

Junjamma and ors. Vs. the Bangalore Development Authority, Rep. by Its ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2005KAR608; 2004(7)KarLJ677

..... provisions it was contended that the bangalore development authority act and the town and country planning act being pre-constitutional amendment legislature, those provisions are inconsistent to part-ix and ixa of the constitution and stand repealed and therefore the bangalore development authority has no jurisdiction to acquire lands which fall within the karnataka municipalities act or the karnataka panchayat raj act, form layouts for distribution of ..... the brief facts are as under:- the bangalore development authority issued a notification under sections 17(1) and (3) of the bangalore development authority act, 1976 (hereinafter for short called as 'the act') stating extent of 183 acres 71/2 guntas situated at sonnenahally, 633 acres 181/2 guntas of ramasandra village, 38 acres 28 guntas situated in kommaghatta village and 75 acres 8 guntas in kengeri village, all situated in kengeri ..... purpose it has to be seen what is the nature of the plea of each petitioner, what was the position of the land on the date of preliminary notification, whether the entire land claimed by the petitioner would fall within the exempted category, if not what is the extent of land which could ..... urban development authority ..... in assuming that he or the authority can make temporary or daily wages appointments under the guise of undertaking development schemes'.chapter iii of the act deals with development schemes. ..... . one such government order is dated 1-1-1987 issued by the government exempting the .....

Annabel Builders Developers Private Limited Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... the respondent-bda having considered the 2nd petitioner s application invoked the provisions of the bangalore development authority (allotment of civic amenity sites) rules, 1989, for short allotment of ca site rules and allotted the civic amenity site in question in favour of the 2nd petitioner, on lease basis with a demand for payment ..... development plan annexure-b, for group housing was accorded sanction by the respondent-bda under the bangalore development authority act, 1976, for short bda act , subject to certain conditions, amongst others, to provide a civic amenity site measuring approximately 5% of the total area put up for residential development ..... to develop 26 acres 32.8 guntas of land in several survey numbers of begur village for residential purpose invoking chapter vii of zoning of land use and regulations providing for revised master plan 2015, for short rmp , under the karnataka town and country planning act, 1961, for short ktcp act . ..... , these writ petitions coming on for preliminary hearing this day, the court made the following: order the core short question for decision making is, whether regulation 7.1(2) of the regulations for residential development plan under the revised master plan 2015 empowers the respondent-bda to allot the civic amenity site on lease and demand lease rentals, 3 exercising jurisdiction under the bangalore development (allotment of civic amenity site) rules, ..... the state of karnataka department of urban development and town planning vikas .....

Y. Mahesh Vs. Mysore Urban Development Authority

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1993KAR1791; 1993(3)KarLJ411

..... muda has been constituted under section 3 of the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987, hereinafter referred to as 'the act', for the purpose of planned development of mysore city as per the provisions of the act; that it has published an advertisement in deccan herald dated 12.1.1992 and other papers stating that it has decided to invite applications for allotment of sixteen thousand sites of various dimensions to certain categories of persons; that the said notification and the act of inviting applications for allotment of residential sites is not ..... chapter ii of the act relates to constitution and incorporation of the urban development authority and other matters relating thereto such as disqualification for office of the members of the urban development authority; term of office and conditions of service members; removal of members; eligibility for reappointment; meeting of the authority; appointment of committees; powers of different authorities; appointment of commissioner; and powers and duties of the commissioner. ..... in that decision, the supreme court observed that it was incomprehensible that the state government should urge such a preliminary objection with a view to stifling at the threshold an enquiry by the court as to whether the workmen were living in bondage and under inhuman conditions. .....