Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 chapter 5 miscellaneous Sorted by: old Page 15 of about 9,844 results (0.239 seconds)

Smt. Ujjam Bai Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [1963]1SCR778; [1963]Supp2SCR778

..... the matter of enforcement of fundamental right of a citizen. 190. where under section 11 of the bihar buildings (lease, rent and eviction) control act, 1947, the controller was given jurisdiction to determine whether there was non-payment of rent or not, as well as the juridiction, on finding that there was non ..... any body or persons having legal authority to determine questions affecting the rights of subjects and having the duty to act judicially act in excess of their legal authority they are subject to the controlling jurisdiction of the kings bench division exercised in these writs.' 227. what was said of judicial action and of ..... sales tax (inspection) : [1960]2scr852 ; and universal imports agency v. chief controller of imports and exports : [1961]1scr305 . these decisions fall under the category in which an executive authority acts without authority of law, or a quasi-judicial authority acts in transgression of a constitutional prohibition and without jurisdiction. i do not think that .....

State of Rajasthan Vs. Mahmood Ghasi Musalman and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1962Raj1

..... of the public prosecutor or someone on his behalf. though no specific provision of law has been referred to by the sub-divisional magistrate under which he purported to act, yet from the nature of the order that was written by the said officer, it seems that he presumably desired to take action under section 247 of the ..... submitted by the station house officer in exercise of his functions as a police officer. such a report would fall within the scope of section 24 of the police act.it cannot, therefore, be conceived that the police report in question was by the station house officer in his private or individual capacity. the report was obviously by ..... is not restricted only to reports under chapter xiv upon information lodged to the police, but embraces all reports by the police submitted under section 24 of the police act.'an application by the police to a magistrate to take action against a person amounts to a 'police report' within the meaning of the term in clause (b) .....

James Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... 's conviction. i am convinced that commissioner v. wilcox, 327 u. s. 404 , which is today overruled, was correctly decided on the basis of every controlling principle used in defining taxable income since the sixteenth amendment's adoption. the chief justice's opinion, although it correctly recites wilcox's holding that "embezzled money does ..... states, supra, at 343 u. s. 138 ; united states v. sullivan, 274 u. s. 259 , 274 u. s. 263 . thereafter, the court held that gains from illicit traffic in liquor are includible within "gross income." ibid. see also johnson v. united states, 318 u. s. 189 ; united states v. johnson, 319 u. s. 503 . and, ..... this policy is inapplicable to decisions of the courts seems obvious: their opportunity for discrimination is more limited than the legislature's, in that they can only act in construing existing law in actual litigation. given the divergent pulls of flexibility and precedent in our case law system, it is disquieting to think what perplexities .....

Bell Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... following determinations have been made regarding the status of all united states army voluntary non-repatriates who elected not to accept repatriation to united states control under the terms of the korean armistice agreement prior to 23 january 1954:" "a. that all voluntary non-repatriates who refused to elect repatriation ..... credits and charges in his account, and all such determinations shall be conclusive: . . . when circumstances warrant reconsideration of any determination authorized to be made by this act [said sections], the head of the department concerned, or such subordinate as he may designate, may change or modify a previous determination. . . ." 50 u.s ..... did many similar things, wrote propaganda articles accusing american soldiers of atrocities and of using germ warfare. he drew posters and cartoons for the enemy, acted in plays, walked and talked with the chinese officers, guards and interpreters, lived part of the time at chinese regimental headquarters, stated he hated .....

Mcgowan Vs. Maryland

Court : US Supreme Court

..... from his worldly concerns, and to direct them to the duties of piety and religion, and the act cannot be construed according to its spirit unless it is so construed as to check the career of worldly traffic. . . . labour may be private and not meet the public eye, and so not offend against ..... sale of intoxicants on sunday. significantly, even those who have assailed the ban on sunday labor as an unconstitutional religious establishment assert the constitutionality of sunday alcohol control. see, e.g., lewis, a critical history of sunday legislation (1888), ix. they point to the contemporary justification for the prohibition of liquor sales ..... 's dissent in this case has become a leading pronouncement on the constitutionality of sunday laws. [ footnote 2/97 ] ex parte andrews, 18 cal. 678. the controlling california constitutional guarantee of religious freedom comports only an analogue to the first amendment's "free exercise," not an analogue to the "establishment" clause. [ footnote 2/98 .....

Two Guys Vs. Mcginley

Court : US Supreme Court

..... impossible that they may find themselves compelled by economic considerations and pressure of local circumstances to open on sunday, because parliament takes no action to control and regulate sunday business in retail shops. if that development should take place, we shall find our shopping centres on a sunday no different in ..... within the power of the legislature to have concluded that these businesses were particularly disrupting the intended atmosphere of the day because of the great volume of motor traffic attracted, [ footnote 7 ] the danger of their competitors also opening on sunday, [ footnote 8 ] and their large number of employees. "evils in ..... the permission of the owner upon whose land the activity is undertaken. the court below, although finding that mcginley threatened to enforce the 1959 act against appellant's employees, denied appellant the injunctive relief sought, dismissing appellant's constitutional objections that the 1959 statute was a law respecting an establishment .....

Pramatha Nath Mitter and Ors. Vs. Hon'ble the Chief Justice of the Hig ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1961Cal545,65CWN920

..... high courts in part a states. it came into operation on or about 20th may, 1954. as originally framed, there was no provision in this act for the control by the central government of any vacations enjoyed by the learned judges of high courts in india. so far as the calcutta high court is concerned, ..... ordinarily understood, the calcutta high court has, and always bad, three vacations, namely the easter vacation, the puja vacation and the christmas vacation, the acts and the order purport to control these vacations and not holidays other than vacations. for our purpose it is not necessary to go beyond the establishment of the supreme court in calcutta ..... is the union legislative competence. it is to my mind difficult to bring periodic or annual control of vacations of state high courts as institutions of justice by the president under section 23a of high court judges (conditions of service) act 1954 within either ''constitution' or 'organisation' of a state high court, without entrenching on .....

Communist Party Vs. Sacb

Court : US Supreme Court

..... , "particularly . . . societies of united englishmen, united scotsmen, united britons, united irishmen, and the london corresponding society. . . ." this 1799 english act, like the subversive activities control act here, comprehensively provided for fines, forfeitures, penalties and imprisonments. it went on to outlaw places where debates could take place or lectures be given or books be ..... and the values of liberty are as complex and intricate as they are in the situation described in the findings of 2 of the subversive activities control act -- when existing government is menaced by a worldwide integrated movement which employs every combination of possible means, peaceful and violent, domestic and foreign, ..... states, 318 u. s. 236 , 318 u. s. 251 (dissenting opinion)) has been thought to fall in the same category as barring speech in places that will create traffic conditions ( schneider v. state, 308 u. s. 147 , 308 u. s. 160 ; cox v. new hampshire, 312 u. s. 569 ) or provoke breaches .....

Scales Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... long as the immunity is not withdrawn. for example, when we recently decided in reina v. united states, 364 u. s. 507 , that the narcotic control act of 1956 legislated immunity from prosecution under state, as well as federal, narcotics laws, our decision did not remotely suggest that the immunity effected the "repeal" ..... argument against the bill by senator kilgore, 96 cong.rec. 15192. [ footnote 7 ] petitioner makes reference to the legislative history of an amendment to the communist control act of 1954, s. 3706, 83d cong., 2d sess., introduced and passed with modifications in a hurried and confused debate in both houses. the amendment, proposed by ..... the statute. in these circumstances, we perceive no basis for this aspect of petitioner's claims. 3. congressional findings in the communist control act of 1954 and the internal security act of 1950 petitioner asserts that the congressional findings as to the character of the communist party contained in both statutes deprived him of .....

Raglivender Rao Vs. Botlagunts Laxminarasayya

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1962Kant89; AIR1962Mys89

..... said that because the court which passed the decree has transferred it for execution to another court , it ceased to have jurisdiction. the transferor court does not altogether surrender its control. the privy council case reported in maharaja of bobbili v. narasaaraj, 43 intended app 238;(air 1926 pc 16) gave rise to some extent to a difference of opinion amount .....