Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 chapter 5 miscellaneous Court: madhya pradesh Page 4 of about 77 results (0.094 seconds)

M.P. Transport Workers Federation and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(5)MPHT374

..... industrialists. it is also contended that the state government has also been allowed to retain the power to include certain state owned or controlled industries within the purview of the act which is totally arbitrary.67. the basic submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the classification is without any intelligible ..... the provision unconstitutional when guidelines can be gathered from the scheme and setting of the statute.42. in m.j. sivani and ors. v. state of karnataka and ors. : [1995]3scr329 , it has been ruled thus:.the guidance for exercising the discretion need not ex facie be found in the notification or orders ..... provisions and hence, the same does not invite the wrath of article 14 of the constitution.(d) the classification made between the state-owned and controlled industries and industries owned by the private entrepreneurs and industrialists is permissible and speaks eloquently about the intelligible differentia.(e) the notification has taken facts into .....

J.B. Mangharam Mazdoor Sangh Thr Vs. J.B. Mangharam Karmchari Union Th ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... 4 scc 766 : lnind 2004 sc 462 and karnataka power transmission corporation v. ashok iron works pvt. ltd., air 2009 sc 1905 : (2009) 3 scc 240 : lnind 2009 sc 270: (2009) 3 mlj 504. 6. ..... having its own limitations. in case of conflict between the plain language of the provision and the meaning of the heading or title, the heading or title would not control the meaning which is clearly and plainly discemible from the language of the provision thereunder. [see: raichurmathan prabhakar v. rawatmal dugar, air 2004 sc 3625: (2004) ..... background the petitioner visited this court. 3. learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the appeal preferred by the respondent no.1 under section 22 of the act is not maintainable as the appeal to the industrial court lies from the order of the registrar cancelling the recognition. it is further submitted that the order .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Bhopal Co-operative Central Bank Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : [1987]164ITR713(MP)

..... of the bank and was exempt from income-tax.10. following the decision of the supreme court in bihar state co-operative bank's case : [1960]39itr114(sc) , the karnataka high court in addl. cit v. m. ranga pai : [1975]100itr413(kar) , the gujarat high court in addl. cit v. ahmedabad district co-operative bank ltd. : ..... : [1968]70itr86(sc) . their lordships have held that interest received on government securities held by a co-operative society qualifies for exemption under section 80p of the act.14. learned counsel appearing for the revenue submitted that the assessee has been holding the same securities and there had been no transaction at all and, therefore, it ..... commissioner who allowed the assessee's appeal holding that the assessee was carrying on banking business and as per provisions of section 24 of the banking regulation act, 1949, the banking companies had to maintain a certain percentage of their assets in the form of securities and hence the securities held by the banking .....

Ramesh Kumar Vs. Gadarai and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1979MP124

..... g. & p. co. (air 1977 sc 1735) (supra), has held as under (at p. 1746):'sections 95 (a) and 95 (b) (i) of the motor vehicles act adopted the provisions of the english road traffic act, 1960, and excluded the liability of the insurance company regarding the risk to the passengers. section 95 provides that a policy of insurance must be a policy ..... of or in pursuance of a contract of employment,(b) damage to property other than property belonging to the insured or held in trust by or in the custody or control of the insured or any member of the insured's household or being conveyed by the motor-cycle. provided always that the company shall not be liable in respect ..... to cover liability in respect of death or bodily injury arising out of and in the course of em- ployment of the employee as required under the workmen's compensation act, 1923. 'workman' means any person (other than a person whose employment is of a casual nature and who is employed otherwise than for the purposes of the employer's .....

Gwalior Sugar Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1991(0)MPLJ868

..... any charges in regard thereto are not paid that the siding can be closed on giving three months' notice. it is also provided that even if the traffic on the siding is not sufficient to justify its retention, it may be kept open at the option of the plaintiff company on payment of such additional expenses ..... any of those terms and conditions, he could not enforce the provision in respect of siding facilities against the defendants. indeed, according to section 41, specific relief act, even when there is a breach in performance of a contract, injunction is refused when that contract is not specifically enforceable in the facts and circumstances of ..... administration that the shunting charge, revised by it from time to time, was 'unreasonable' that could be decided by the tribunal under section 41 (c) of the act. about the scope of tribunal's jurisdiction thereunder the words 'levying any other charge' are themselves vocal, but those have also been judicially interpreted to include such charges .....

Shrikant Bangur and ors. Vs. Shree Synthetics Shramik Union

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : [2004(101)FLR547]; (2004)IILLJ968MP

..... basis of the defence which can be raised by the accused in the trial. in this regard the following observation made in case of m. narayandas v. state of karnataka and ors., 2003 air scw 6030 are relevant:'we also give a note of caution to the effect that the power of quashing a criminal proceeding should be exercised ..... calcutta filed in the case it is clear, that the applicant is directed to make the payment or all its dues under the employees' provident funds and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952 and under the laws relating to the provident fund. consequently, it is clear that there is a prima facie evidence against the applicant of his involvement in an ..... section 405 of i.p.c. runs as below:'a person being an employer of an establishment whether exempted under section 7 of the employees provident funds and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952 (19 of 1952) or not who deducts the employee's contribution from the wages payable to the employee for credit to a provident fund or family pension .....

ispat Khadan Janta Mazdoor Union. Vs. the Director, Steel Authority of ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

..... , chandigarh and others air 2004 sc 969;workmen of nilgiri co- op.mkt. society ltd. vs. state of tamil nadu and others air 2004 sc 1639; state of karnataka & ors. vs. kgsd canteen employees welfare association & ors. air 2006 sc 845.26. there is yet another facet to the instant case. employment of the contract labour ..... or to be employed in the mine. under mines creche rules,1966, the facility used to be provided to 1500 female workers. maternity benefit act, 1961 is also applicable. the total control on all workers was of mines manager. the workers can enter the mine only with the permission of the manager. form b service record is ..... of the workers. disciplinary powers including power to suspend lies with the management in certain exigencies, as discussed above. thus, as per aforesaid various statutory provisions, control and supervision is exercised by the management not by the contractor as per the deposition of witnesses of management.21. the contract which was entered into by the .....

Madhya Pradesh Ration Vikreta Sangh, Jabalpur and ors. Vs. State of Ma ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1981MP203

..... appointments. in pursuance of the policy contained in this wireless message, the government issued the order dated 30th october, 1980 under section 3 of the essential commodities act amending the 1960 control order. the important amendments made by this order were that clauses 3, 4, 11 to 16, 18 to 24 and 36 were omitted. these clauses ..... amended without such concurrence. in our opinion, this argument cannot be accepted. the power to make an order under section 3 of the act in respect of matters covered by the 1960 control order de-legated to the state government under section 5 does not require concurrence of the central government. the concurrence of the central government ..... is argued that the state government could have made these provisions is an order made under section 3 read with section 5 of the essential commodities act as was the position under the 1960 control order before its amendment. but it has no power to make a scheme for distribution of foodstuffs under clause 2 (d) of the .....

Godfrey Philips India Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (2008)17VST465(MP)

..... and goods along the national highway. apart from this, other facilities provided by the state government along all highways including national highways, such as lighting, traffic control, amenities for passengers, halting places for buses and trucks are available for use by everyone including those travelling along the national highways. it cannot therefore ..... . hansa corporation : [1981]1scr823 .20. the above decision dealt with the challenge against the validity of the karnataka tax on entry of goods into local areas for consumption, use or sale therein act (27 of 1979). reference has been made to the majority view in atiabari tea co. ltd. v. state of assam : ..... for setting up of and administration of municipal corporations and municipalities. octroi thus understood was being levied by various municipalities and municipal corporations in karnataka state. since some time a feeling had grown that octroi was obnoxious in character and impeded the development of trade and commerce and there .....

Bhav Singh Vs. Smt. Savirani and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2008ACJ1043; AIR2008MP1; [2008(2)JCR159(MP); 2007(4)MPHT460; 2008(1)MPLJ72; 2008(1)AIRKarR314(FB)(MP); 2008AIHC386(MP)(FB)

..... of the supreme court in pushpabai purshottam udeshi (supra) are quoted herein below:21. section 95(a) and 95(b)(i) of the motor vehicles act adopted the provisions of the english road traffic act, 1960 and excluded the liability of the insurance company regarding the risk to the passengers. section 95 provides that a policy of insurance must be a ..... respect to the carriage of persons other than the driver in goods carriages. section 96 is placed in chapter-v of the act which relates to 'control of transport vehicles'. sub-section (1) of section 96 of the act states that the state government may make rules for the purpose of carrying into effect the provisions of chapter-v. hence, rule ..... 97 of the rules of 1994 has been made by the state government to give effect to the provisions of chapter-v of the act, which, as we have seen, relates to 'control of transport vehicles'. these rules obviously cannot have a bearing in interpreting the provisions of chapter-xi of the .....