Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka societies registration act 1960 section 15 suits by and against society Court: chennai Page 4 of about 32 results (0.092 seconds)

N.P.Thangaraj Vs. Church of South India

Court : Chennai

..... memorial csio college of engineering & technology and vethamonickam memorial csi polytechnic college, whereas those two institutions were not even in existence at the time of registration of purchase documents. with regard to the purchase of property, chapter xviii rule 50.2(b) of the constitution of 5th defendant csi kanyakumari diocese ..... respondents, they did not raise any objection with regard to non-impleadment of all the trustees. the 2nd respondent is a registered society, registered under section 26 of indian companies act, 1913. honourary secretary of the second defendant is the authorised person to represent the second defendant, a legal entity. the applicants ..... churches in south india such as anglican, methodist, presbyterian and the south india united church in the four southern states of tamil nadu, kerala, karnataka and andhra pradesh. the church of south india is a protestant religious denomination. the headquarters of church of south india is situated in chennai. there .....

Ms.indroyal Crafts Private Ltd. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu.

Court : Chennai

..... the 5th respondent was not registered under the trade unions act but it was registered under the societies registration act, 1860. therefore, a union cannot be registered under the societies registration act as it is illegal. if they make an application for registration under the trade unions act, the authority should not act upon the said proposal. the attention of the registrar ..... .13.the 2nd objection made by the learned counsel for the petitioners is placed upon the judgment of the supreme court in b.srinivasa reddy vs. karnataka urban water supply and drainage board employees' association and others reported in 2006(11) scc 731. in that case the supreme court held that after ..... in the light of the introduction of section 2(qq) of the industrial disputes act. but in that case the employees union filed a quo warranto writ petition against the continuance of the managing director of the karnataka urban water supply and drainage board. the matter was resisted including the locus standi of .....

K.Muthukumara Pillai Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Registration,

Court : Chennai

..... .the brief facts which are necessary to decide the issue involved in the present writ petition are as follows; (a) the 5th respondent society viz., lekshmipuram college society, is a registered society under the tamil nadu societies registration act. the 5th respondent society is running a college by name lekshmipuram college of arts and science, lekshmipuram, kanyakumari district and the said college is a government aided cum ..... and others.(c)(1993) 4 scc10(rattan lal sharma versus managing committee, dr.hariram co.education hss and others.(d)(2014) 2 scc401(j.jayalalithaa and others versus state of karnataka and others.9.the learned counsel for the respondents submitted that it is incorrect to state that the impugned order is illegal, arbitrary and mala fide. the fifth respondent herein .....

Tamil Nadu Mahajana Sangam, Represented by Its President C. Venkatasub ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2004(3)CTC189

..... a.nos. 1649 and 1650 of 1998,which arose out of the two suits of the year 1994 that the society was not functioning in accordance with the tamil nadu societies registration act, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') and the bye-laws and therefore, this court was pleased to appoint an advocate commissioner and advocate receiver for ..... case the high court depending upon the facts of the case.'12. in jt. registrar of co-operative societies v. t.a. kuttappan, : air2000sc2378 , the supreme court considered the provisions of the karnataka act and the kerala act with regard to the appointment of a special officer by the state government on a report made by the registrar ..... out in the course of the judgment. even where the language of section 30-a of the karnataka act empowered a special officer to exercise and perform all the powers and functions of committee of management of a co-operative society fell for consideration, this court having expressed that view, we do not think, there is any .....

P. Rajeshkumar Bagmar Vs. Swathi Rajeshkumar Bagmar

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR2008Mad36; II(2008)DMC696; (2008)1MLJ575

..... reasons. even the panchayats arranged not yielded any result since the respondent was influenced by the ill advise of her parents. the act of the respondent in withdrawing from the petitioner's society without any reasonable excuse has caused serious matrimonial loss of discomfort and consortium of the child, hence, the petitioner was forced to ..... payments, issuance of cheques and a claim of having made further payments and, therefore, onus lies on the defendant. the denial of registration of partnership is also prima facie frivolous. the plaintiff has given the registration number of the partnership firm of the plaintiff.ii) ram narain prasad v. seth sao : air1979pat174 , wherein in para nos. ..... of this contention, the learned counsel for the respondent relied on smt. jyothi pai v. p.n. pratap kumar pai air 1987 karnataka 241, wherein a learned single judge of the karnataka high court held in para no. 2 thus:2. the learned civil judge appears to have thought that in a proceeding like this .....

V.Dilip Kumar Vs. State Rep. by Deputy Superintendent of Polic.

Court : Chennai

..... as is alleged to have been done to the appellant in this case. the appellant has submitted that due to registration of the case and pendency of the investigation he lost his chance of promotion to the post of chief engineer ..... pending against the incumbent. the appellant has further alleged that he has been deprived the love, affection and the society of his children who were residing in foreign country as on account of the pendency of the investigation he could ..... containing the materials collected against the accused should be placed before the sanctioning authority. in air 2008 sc 108 (state of karnataka v. ameer jan), in para-8, it reads as follows: 8. .. .. we have noticed hereinbefore that the sanctioning ..... (xii) the following table shows the details of the loan and loanees:sl.no.name of the loanees s.b.act.no.loan dateamountwithdrawal slipreceived by1. ravi20594.10.199112530ex.p11a4/kumaresan2. mohan21146.12.199112500ex.p20a4/kumaresan3. sampath21086.12.199112500ex.p41a4/kumaresan4. .....

V. Vinod Kumar Vs. V. Arunadevi

Court : Chennai

..... 7 years old; the child was with the father upto 21-9-2000, the date on which he was arrested and kept in judicial custody in pursuance of the registration of crime no. 39 of 2000; the father is employed as an assistant in oriental insurance company and has a regular income to support himself and the minor ..... of her profession and financial resources, may be in a position to guarantee better health, education and maintenance for them. ........the family is normally the heart of our society and for a balanced and healthy growth of children it is highly desirable that they get their due share of affection and care form both the parental home. where, ..... the minor, which is a matter of greater importance. ? 81. in smt.radha parimala v. n.rangappa reported in air 2004 karnataka 299, the application, filed by the father, under section 25 of the hindu minority and guardianship act, was ordered. the facts which weighed the mind of the court, to order custody to the father, is extracted hereunder: 16 .....

Kanagavalli and 4 Others Vs. Saroja and 3 Others

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR2002Mad73; II(2001)DMC603; (2001)3MLJ360

..... and local conditions prevailing therein. the following enactments of the states governments provide for uniform compulsory registration of marriages: * the bombay registration of marriages act, 1953 as in force in the states of maharashtra and gujarat. * the karnataka marriages act, 1976 in force since 1983. * the himachal pradesh registration of marriage act, in force since 1997. 12. after considering the responses of the state's parties, the ..... duties of a wife, leaves her with neither the right under law, nor the recognition in society. in addition, the hindu male is able to contract a second marriage without any fear. in a divorce proceeding or in a proceeding under the bigamy prevention act, the hindu male can admit or deny the first or the second marriage depending on his whim .....

Lakshmi G. Menon Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1999(105)ELT279(Mad)

..... in sabhajit tewary v. union of india : (1975)illj374sc the question a rose whether the council of scientific and industrial research which was a society registered under the societies registration act, was a statutory body. it was argued that because the council of scientific and industrial research had government nominees as the president of the body ..... which could be liable for the offences committed and not its employees, the learned counsel for the petitioner has relied on a judgment of the karnataka high court reported in : 1995ecr455(karnataka) [tonesta electronics v. asstt. collector of excise, bangalore]. it is true that in paragraph no. 8 of the judgment, it is stated ..... that where the provisions of the act are violated by a company, it is the company which actually commits the offence and a person cannot be made .....

M.H.Jawahirullah Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

..... no.24 of 1985. it appears that in the same name kanyakumari mavatta muslim jammath koottamaippu represented by its president m.ibrahim khan subsequently and there was registration of the society with regn.no.1 of 2007. the 7th respondent tamizhmahan hussain is said to be associated with kanyakumari mavatta muslim jammath koottamaippu with regn.no.24 of ..... challenged and those writ petitions were dismissed upholding the validity of section 14 of wakf act and therefore, provision of section 14 of the act cannot be said to be unconstitutional.63. by perusal of the decision in air 199.karnataka 112 (syed shah muhammad al hussaini v. union of india and others), it is seen that the ..... writ petition was filed challenging the constitutional validity of sections 14, 33, 38, 61, 64, 69, 70, 71, 72 and 96 of wakf act, 1995. but the learned counsel for petitioner .....